Just talk with sergey about this on IRC. He suggested to move that i18n
stuff to BLF rather than BKE. But this means we’ll likely have to import
from BLF in many parts of Blender (nodes, modifiers, RNA, etc.). Would
it be acceptable?
Le 08/11/2011 10:07, Bastien Montagne a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> A Brecht's commit regarding nodes (41633) broke the i18n process
> (IFACE_(name) works at execution time, but xgettext has no way to find
> the strings to translate).
>
> That is a small glitch indeed, but it raises a problem that we’ll have
> too when it comes to translating messages (BKE_report and co): with this
> commit, I need to use IFACE_ in node_[composite/shader/texture]_tree.c,
> and I don’t think including UI_interface.h here is good!
>
> (We already have an
> #include "UI_interface.h" /* bad level call into editors */
> in bpy_rna.c...)
>
> Hence, the question: would it be a good idea to move the i18n macros and
> funcs from UI to BKE (e.g. place them into BKE_blender.h)? If so, I’m
> volunteering ;)
>
> Best regards,
> Bastien
> ___
> Bf-committers mailing list
> Bf-committers@blender.org
> http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
___
Bf-committers mailing list
Bf-committers@blender.org
http://lists.blender.org/mailman/listinfo/bf-committers
