update with no effect
I have started seeing these entries in named.log: 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.467 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.468 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.469 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.470 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.471 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.472 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.478 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.479 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.480 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.481 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.482 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.483 general: warning: update with no effect 29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.484 general: warning: update with no effect What is that about? This is bind 9.4.2-P2 on Solaris 8. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: NOTIFY from masters when slave provides several views
Let me clarify - for a zone in more than one of the views, that zone's
data doesn't vary by zone. The internal view has some zones not found
in the customer or external views.
This sounds like a job for the allow-query option in the zone statements.
I should have mentioned that I tried that, but got:
option 'allow-query' is not allowed in 'forward' zone 'xxx.yyy.com'
In fact, that's what forced me into views in the first place.
Also, the external view doesn't provide recursion, while the customer
and internal ones do.
And this is a job for allow-query and allow-query-cache.
What's the deal with allow-query? I did some lookups from a host on an
outside net (not in either the internal or customer views) and the server
answered queries for the zones it hosted regardless of whether it was set
to allow-query { internal; customer; }; or allow-query { any; };.
Terry Kennedy http://www.tmk.com
te...@tmk.com New York, NY USA
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
dhcp options 226 and 227
Im trying to figure out how to add options 226 and 227 to my dhcp server. I have not been able to find much about this through google. Has anyone implemented these options for their dhcp server? I added the following to my dhcpd.conf (main file) option option-226 code 226 = array of integer 8; option option-227 code 227 = ip-address; option option-226 10,40,0,29; option option-227 10.40.0.29; Im not sure what the array of integer 8 is at all, but the only example I could find had that in the main options area. thanks, ddh -- Dwayne Hottinger Network Administrator Harrisonburg City Public Schools Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of moral crisis, preserved their neutrality. -- Dante ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: Max. Number of char in a TXT Record
Darvin Denmian wrote: Hello, I have some questions: 1) Anybody know the maximum number of characters allowed in a TXT field? 255 for each string. E.g., @ TXT v=spf1 mx ip4:216.208.1.1 a:mail01.mydomain.com a:mail02.mydomain.com a:mail03.mydomain.com include:something.else.com -all Notice there are two sets of quoted text here to simulate the entire TXT string being longer than 255 chars. You'd just split it up into multiple quoted strings that each are not longer than 255 chars. Note that there is a leading space in the second string. For SPF processing, these TXT strings are concatenated together as-is and without the leading space in the second string, it would generate a syntax error. 2) What is the maximum number of includes inside a SFP field? Don't chain them more than 2 or 3 times, you'll run into SPF processing limits. If you have to use more than that, then you need to rethink you're matching approach. The RFCs on the subject limit DNS lookups to 10, that includes the TXT record itself, any A, MX and PTR records that have to be looked up by name, and any further include: lookups and associated records. A Permanent Error will be returned if you exceed the 10 lookup limit. See http://www.openspf.org/, there are tools, tips and tricks to help you. Regards, Mike -- Michael Milligan - mi...@acmeps.com ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: dhcp options 226 and 227
ddh, You're on the BIND list. Try dhcp-users (https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users) instead. Regards. Andy dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Im trying to figure out how to add options 226 and 227 to my dhcp server. I have not been able to find much about this through google. Has anyone implemented these options for their dhcp server? I added the following to my dhcpd.conf (main file) option option-226 code 226 = array of integer 8; option option-227 code 227 = ip-address; option option-226 10,40,0,29; option option-227 10.40.0.29; Im not sure what the array of integer 8 is at all, but the only example I could find had that in the main options area. thanks, ddh ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: dhcp options 226 and 227
Try the next list over, dhcp-us...@isc.org. Also see https://www.isc.org/software/dhcp/documentation In message 20090330124035.7mp9s88srossk...@mail.harrisonburg.k12.va.us, dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us writes: Im trying to figure out how to add options 226 and 227 to my dhcp server. I have not been able to find much about this through google. Has anyone implemented these options for their dhcp server? I added the following to my dhcpd.conf (main file) option option-226 code 226 = array of integer 8; option option-227 code 227 = ip-address; option option-226 10,40,0,29; option option-227 10.40.0.29; Im not sure what the array of integer 8 is at all, but the only example I could find had that in the main options area. thanks, ddh -- Dwayne Hottinger Network Administrator Harrisonburg City Public Schools Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of moral crisis, preserved their neutrality. -- Dante ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: mark_andr...@isc.org ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: dhcp options 226 and 227
Oops, Sorry. Quoting Andy Shellam andy-li...@networkmail.eu: ddh, You're on the BIND list. Try dhcp-users (https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/dhcp-users) instead. Regards. Andy dhottin...@harrisonburg.k12.va.us wrote: Im trying to figure out how to add options 226 and 227 to my dhcp server. I have not been able to find much about this through google. Has anyone implemented these options for their dhcp server? I added the following to my dhcpd.conf (main file) option option-226 code 226 = array of integer 8; option option-227 code 227 = ip-address; option option-226 10,40,0,29; option option-227 10.40.0.29; Im not sure what the array of integer 8 is at all, but the only example I could find had that in the main options area. thanks, ddh -- Dwayne Hottinger Network Administrator Harrisonburg City Public Schools Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler. -- Albert Einstein The hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who, in times of moral crisis, preserved their neutrality. -- Dante ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: update with no effect
Lars Hecking wrote:
I have started seeing these entries in named.log:
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.467 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.468 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.469 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.470 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.471 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.472 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.478 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.479 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.480 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.481 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.482 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.483 general: warning: update with no effect
29-Mar-2009 05:02:35.484 general: warning: update with no effect
What is that about? This is bind 9.4.2-P2 on Solaris 8.
If I had to guess, I'd say it's probably a broken IXFR implementation on
the other end:
if (result == DNS_R_UNCHANGED) {
/*
* This will not happen when executing a
* dynamic update, because that code will
* generate strictly minimal diffs.
* It may happen when receiving an IXFR
* from a server that is not as careful.
* Issue a warning and continue.
*/
if (warn)
isc_log_write(DIFF_COMMON_LOGARGS,
ISC_LOG_WARNING,
update with no effect);
It would be nice to have the zone name and/or master server name in the
error message. Maybe that was added in a later version (too lazy to
check right now :-)
- Kevin
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: NOTIFY from masters when slave provides several views
In article gqq1nm$2tc...@sf1.isc.org, terry+bindus...@tmk.com wrote:
Let me clarify - for a zone in more than one of the views, that zone's
data doesn't vary by zone. The internal view has some zones not found
in the customer or external views.
This sounds like a job for the allow-query option in the zone statements.
I should have mentioned that I tried that, but got:
option 'allow-query' is not allowed in 'forward' zone 'xxx.yyy.com'
In fact, that's what forced me into views in the first place.
Since forwarding is part of recursion, this will be handled by the
allow-recursion global option.
Also, the external view doesn't provide recursion, while the customer
and internal ones do.
And this is a job for allow-query and allow-query-cache.
Sorry, I meant allow-recursion there.
What's the deal with allow-query? I did some lookups from a host on an
outside net (not in either the internal or customer views) and the server
answered queries for the zones it hosted regardless of whether it was set
to allow-query { internal; customer; }; or allow-query { any; };.
Do you still have views configured? I think the view options override
the global options.
--
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
