Re: can @ be CNAME?

2010-11-23 Thread Tech W.
Thanks a lot Matthew.

 
 CNAME records are special.  You can't have any other
 records for a label
 where you have a CNAME record (well, with the exception of
 RRSIG records
 if you're using DNSSEC).  This is covered in great
 detail in any
 introductory text on DNS.
 
 The principle reason to want to have a CNAME record at the
 apex of a
 zone is to make http://example.com/ be a synonym for
 http://www.example.com/.  The way to deal with
 that is to turn it round
 and make www.example.com be the CNAME record, and have the
 A record at
 example.com.  Or just have A or  records at both
 example.com and
 www.example.com
 



  
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Split Delegation IP Reverse

2010-11-23 Thread Wilbert J. Rojas O.


  
  
Hi,

Hello!

  My scenario is as follows:

  I have the following network
192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS server for this zone
reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP upgrade to
a second DNS server is a slave.

  Well my question is:

  Suppose I have a third server that
will manage DNS but only part of the reverse IP block that my
two DNS servers given, say that this third server must manage
the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only.

  How could you do this?

  Escuchar
  Leer fonticamente
  


Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
Administrador de Sistemas.
Colegio Centro Amrica 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411

  

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse

2010-11-23 Thread Jonathan Petersson
You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the
third server.

230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O.
wro...@ideay.net.ni wrote:
 Hi,

 Hello!

 My scenario is as follows:

 I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS
 server for this zone reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP
 upgrade to a second DNS server is a slave.

 Well my question is:

 Suppose I have a third server that will manage DNS but only part of the
 reverse IP block that my two DNS servers given, say that this third server
 must manage the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only.

 How could you do this?
 Escuchar
 Leer fonéticamente

 Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
 Administrador de Sistemas.
 Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
 wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411

 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse

2010-11-23 Thread Wilbert J. Rojas O.

Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea.


Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
Administrador de Sistemas.
Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411


El 23/11/2010 04:01 p.m., Jonathan Petersson escribió:


You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the
third server.

230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname

On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O.
wro...@ideay.net.ni  wrote:

Hi,

Hello!

My scenario is as follows:

I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS
server for this zone reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP
upgrade to a second DNS server is a slave.

Well my question is:

Suppose I have a third server that will manage DNS but only part of the
reverse IP block that my two DNS servers given, say that this third server
must manage the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only.

How could you do this?
Escuchar
Leer fonéticamente

Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
Administrador de Sistemas.
Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse

2010-11-23 Thread Kevin Oberman
It makes the thread hard to follow!
 Why not?
  Please don't top post.

  On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:43 PM, Wilbert J. Rojas O.
  wro...@ideay.net.ni  wrote:
  Hi,
 
  Hello!
 
  My scenario is as follows:
 
  I have the following network 192.168.0.0/24 which manages my primary DNS
  server for this zone reversals and if any updates on the reverse of an IP
  upgrade to a second DNS server is a slave.
 
  Well my question is:
 
  Suppose I have a third server that will manage DNS but only part of the
  reverse IP block that my two DNS servers given, say that this third server
  must manage the reverse DNS for the network 192.168.0.230/28 only.
 
  How could you do this?
  Escuchar
  Leer fonéticamente
 
  Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
  Administrador de Sistemas.
  Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
  wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411
 
  ___
  bind-users mailing list
  bind-users@lists.isc.org
  https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
 
 El 23/11/2010 04:01 p.m., Jonathan Petersson escribió:
 
  You could CNAME the records to another PTR domain maintained by the
  third server.
 
  230.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa is an alias for 230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
  230.0-28.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa domain name pointer host.domainname
 


 Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:18:17 -0600
 From: Wilbert J. Rojas O. wro...@ideay.net.ni
 Sender: bind-users-bounces+oberman=es@lists.isc.org
 
 Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea.
 
 
 Ing. Wilbert J. Rojas O. |Equipos y Sistemas, S.A.
 Administrador de Sistemas.
 Colegio Centro América 60 mts al norte. | Managua, Nicaragua
 wro...@ideay.net.ni | Tel.:+505 2277-4000 Ext.115|Fax: +505 2277-4411
 
 

See RFC2317, Classless IN-ADDR.ARPA delegation.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1035.txt
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet)
Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab)
E-mail: ober...@es.net  Phone: +1 510 486-8634
Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4  EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Split Delegation IP Reverse

2010-11-23 Thread Barry Margolin
In article mailman.860.1290550595.555.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
 Wilbert J. Rojas O. wro...@ideay.net.ni wrote:

 Jonathan Thanks for responding, but I don't understand your idea.

See RFC 2317 for the mechanism to delegate subnets of a /24.

-- 
Barry Margolin, bar...@alum.mit.edu
Arlington, MA
*** PLEASE don't copy me on replies, I'll read them in the group ***
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: error (broken trust chain) resolving

2010-11-23 Thread Brian J . Murrell
Casey Deccio casey at deccio.net writes: 
 
 I still don't have the answer to this.

Fair enough.  I was just looking for clarification on your previous statements.

 Perhaps a BIND developer may
 have better insight into the log messages and what may be going on.

Yeah, I was hoping to have caught the attention of a BIND developer here with
all of this by now.  Perhaps they just don't hang out here.  Maybe I will try to
find out where to ask questions that they might see.

Thanx!

b.
 




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: error (broken trust chain) resolving

2010-11-23 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010, Brian J. Murrell wrote:

 Yeah, I was hoping to have caught the attention of a BIND developer 
 here with all of this by now.  Perhaps they just don't hang out here.  
 Maybe I will try to find out where to ask questions that they might 
 see.

I was reading it all along, but could never reproduce. I thought it was 
a temporary issue.

I see your new bug report. Someone will follow up soon.

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users