Re: Graphing BIND 9.11/9.10 Queries

[Jerry Lundström via bind-users]

Hi,

On 01/18/17 18:25, Bob Harold wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Welisson Tomé  > wrote:
> 
> I'd like to know what kind of tools are you using to graphing
> queries on Bind as Recursion Server?
> 
> https://www.dns-oarc.net/tools/dsc

We have also been working on graphing with Grafana as you can see on our
test/demo installation:

  https://dev.dns-oarc.net/dsc-grafana2/dashboard/db/dsc

Cheers,
Jerry
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: [bind-users] Graphing BIND 9.11/9.10 Queries

[Jerry K]

I'm sure others will answer, but if you haven't already done so, I would suggest 
the list archives for answers already in place.


Here are a few I pulled out of my personal BIND list archives.

.
http://o-s.kpnqwest.pt

mrtg - multiple list references to /contrib/queryperf directory

http://www.snoogans.co.uk/files/rndcstats.pl <- link dead, but I bet this can be 
found somewhere.  Might be here 


dnsstats - found here -> http://www.shub-internet.org/brad/dns/index.html

Bind 8 & 9 stats from campin.net, waybackmachine reference
http://web.archive.org/web/20030216040611/http://www.campin.net/DNS/
http://web.archive.org/web/20030207033410/http://www.campin.net/DNS/graph.html

many standard Unix monitoring utilities, Cacti, Nagios, etc, have graphing 
utilities either built into the core for DNS, or via some contributed text.


Orca -

originally here - 


but now reference 
or 
or 
.

Hopefully something here helps.

If you find something you like better, please share.

Jerry




On 01/18/17 08:16 AM, Welisson Tomé wrote:



Hi All,

I'd like to know what kind of tools are you using to graphing queries on
Bind as Recursion Server?

BestRegards,



___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Graphing BIND 9.11/9.10 Queries

[Bob Harold]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Welisson Tomé 
wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to know what kind of tools are you using to graphing queries on
> Bind as Recursion Server?
>
> BestRegards,
>
> --
>
> Welisson Tomébr.linkedin.com/in/welissontome/
>
>
>
https://www.dns-oarc.net/tools/dsc

-- 
Bob Harold
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Reasons to upgrade?

[lbutlr]

On 2017-01-18 (09:07 MST), Mukund Sivaraman  wrote:
> 
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:02:04AM -0700, lbutlr wrote:
>> It looks like there are three version of Bindcurrently supported,
>> 9.9.9, 9.10, and 9.11.
>> 
>> Are there specific reasons to move from 9.9 to 9.10 or 9.11 other than
>> the usual "it's newer and you're going to have to move at some point
>> anyway"?
> 
> See:
> 
> https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01432/0/BIND-9.11.0-Release-Notes.html

Thanks everyone, I’ve got some reading to do.

One note for whoever maintains the list, I use my twitter handle as my real 
name, but this list has a very aggressive grep match that triggers on the @ in 
my twitter handle.

(the grep is ^From:.*@.*@.*$ and should be ^From:.*\<.*@.*@.*\>$

-- 
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures.

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Reasons to upgrade?

[Mukund Sivaraman]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 08:02:04AM -0700, lbutlr wrote:
> It looks like there are three version of Bindcurrently supported,
> 9.9.9, 9.10, and 9.11.
> 
> Are there specific reasons to move from 9.9 to 9.10 or 9.11 other than
> the usual "it's newer and you're going to have to move at some point
> anyway"?

See:

https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-01432/0/BIND-9.11.0-Release-Notes.html

Mukund


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Graphing BIND 9.11/9.10 Queries

[Welisson Tomé]

 

Hi All, 

I'd like to know what kind of tools are you using to graphing queries on
Bind as Recursion Server? 

BestRegards, 

-- 

Welisson Tomé
br.linkedin.com/in/welissontome/
 ___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Reasons to upgrade?

[Tomas Krizek]

On 01/18/2017 04:02 PM, lbutlr wrote:
> It looks like there are three version of Bindcurrently supported, 9.9.9, 
> 9.10, and 9.11.
>
> Are there specific reasons to move from 9.9 to 9.10 or 9.11 other than the 
> usual "it's newer and you're going to have to move at some point anyway"?
>
> Any gotchas?
For users of bind-dyndb-ldap (LDAP driver for BIND), there's a
significant change in BIND 9.11.

An API for dynamic database was accepted upstream, so patching the
upstream BIND is no longer necessary. However, the upstream API is a bit
different, which has two implications.

First, the minimal required version of bind-dyndb-ldap is the recently
released v11.0 [1].

Second, you have to transform your named.conf section which configures
the dynamic database to reflect the new API. You can see an example of
the new configuration format in the Configuration section of the README
file [2]. If you'd like to do this automatically, there is an upstream
pull request that has a sed script [3].

[1] - https://fedorahosted.org/released/bind-dyndb-ldap/
[2] - https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/bind-dyndb-ldap.git/tree/README.md
[3] - https://github.com/freeipa/bind-dyndb-ldap/pull/7

-- 
Tomas Krizek



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Reasons to upgrade?

[Cathy Almond]

On 18/01/2017 15:02, lbutlr wrote:
> It looks like there are three version of Bindcurrently supported, 9.9.9, 
> 9.10, and 9.11.
> 
> Are there specific reasons to move from 9.9 to 9.10 or 9.11 other than the 
> usual "it's newer and you're going to have to move at some point anyway"?
> 
> Any gotchas?
> 

Choose the strategy that best suits your production environment.  Some
thoughts to provoke your decision can be found here:

https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00771

** Note, last updated in 2014, so go by the principle, not the versions :D
___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Reasons to upgrade?

[lbutlr]

It looks like there are three version of Bindcurrently supported, 9.9.9, 9.10, 
and 9.11.

Are there specific reasons to move from 9.9 to 9.10 or 9.11 other than the 
usual "it's newer and you're going to have to move at some point anyway"?

Any gotchas?

-- 
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures.



-- 
Apple broke AppleScripting signatures in Mail.app, so no random signatures.

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users