Re: Question about visibility

2018-10-11 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues

Em 11/10/18 16:13, Barry Margolin escreveu:


If you accidentally, or someone else intentionally, create a link to the
site that uses the IP and put it on a web page that Google can get to,
it will probably find the page.




    robots.txt, on your website root, is your friend. Simply deny web 
crawling on it, and you're (probably) done.




--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it



___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: designing the DNS from the scratch

2017-07-10 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues

Em 10/07/17 11:12, Matthew Seaman escreveu:


Or you could buy a service from one of a number of DNS service providers
who provide pretty much exactly what I described.  That will still be
quite expensive, but not to the extent that it would cause inadvertent
emission of bodily fluids.



I have been using Amazon AWS Route 53 DNS services and i'm loving 
them. The price is really low for the availability i'm experiencing, the 
easy management.


--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it



___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: how to ignore external queries?

2010-03-20 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues

Em 19/03/2010 19:43, ic.nssip escreveu:
and the results came up with a statement that External Queries are 
REJECTED and It would be better for it to ignore external queries.
_Question is... How can I IGNORE External Queries instead of Rejecting 
them?_




firewall them !!! The better would be to completly avoid external 
queries for even reaching your DNS server 



--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: How to find out DNS Server version ?

2009-11-13 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues



   you can always try:

dig   @dns.server.to.query   version.bind   chaos   txt

which would return something like:


;; QUESTION SECTION:
;version.bind.  CH  TXT

;; ANSWER SECTION:
version.bind.   0   CH  TXT djbdns 1.05

   (sorry for the djbdns  i found no bind that allows that for 
examplifying it :)   )


   the big problem here is that DNS servers, quite usually, do not 
accept this queries or, in some other quite usual configuration, change 
the text for some generic string, which can be easily done in BINDs for 
example:



;; ANSWER SECTION:
version.bind.   0   CH  TXT version goes here


   there's absolutely no guaranteed way of getting the correct version 
running on DNSs server you have no admin access. The only guaranteed to 
work 100% of the simes still seems to be the 'named -v' on the machine's 
console.





Tibo escreveu:

Hello !

I have a little problem :

We have 4 little datacenters over the world.
I would like to check if all DNS servers are up to date but only people
responsible of a datacenter can access their servers for security 
reasons.

I know some tools on the net can do that but it's not easy for me and
I'd like to automatise all of that.


--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: How to find out DNS Server version ?

2009-11-13 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues

Tibo escreveu:


I think I found it : fpdns -f NAMESERVER

Is it always OK ?


   No, that's not always OK, because -f option of fpdns relies on the 
version.bind record, which i explained on my previous message that 
sometimes cant be queries and other times can fake some false version id.


fpdns -fand the   dig command i gave you queries exactly the same thing.

none of those (which are in fact the sam thing) are 100% reliable for 
identifying remote dns server versions



--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Modified a zone, so when it becomes available?

2009-09-15 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues

Marcos Lorenzo de Santiago escreveu:

When I modify a RR or add a new one on an existing zone, I have to
restart master server to make the change available. Is there any other
way to reload the zone without stopping bind?

I've tried with:
- rdnc reload [zone]
- rndc reconfig [zone]
- rndc refresh [zone]

Am I missing anything?
  



   'rndc reload' is enough to make the zones being re-read and 
new/updated records available.


   Problably you're missing:

1) to increment the zone serial ... if you dont do that, bind wont know 
you updated the zone. That's important, ALWAYS update the serial when 
changing/adding records;


2) your DNS server itself is using another DNS server which is caching 
the records, so cache needs to expire so new/updated records can be 
seen. You can have your DNS server using itself (127.0.0.1) as DNS 
server, that should solve if this is the problem;




--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

SERVFAIL debugging

2009-03-13 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues


   Hello,

   I'm having SERVFAIL problems on some domains. I'm pretty sure it's 
not a bind problem, because everything is working but some few domains.


   I'm already running 9.6.0-P1 ...

   is it possible to, using dig or some other bind tool, to grab 
informations from running BIND and debug exactly why i'm having this 
SERVFAILs ??? At the right moment, the only think i know is that a full 
stop/start will make those domains works fine  but in some hours, i 
start having SERVFAILs  and have to stop/start again .


   is there something i can do to track this and, at least, try to find 
exactly what's happening ?


   Thanks.

--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it





smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-17 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães



Peter Dambier escreveu:

I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB.
That cpu can address no more than 16 MB.

  


   i have tried running 9.4.3 instead of 9.5.0-P2  and got odd results.

   9.5.0-P2 right after start. Not a single query was made to it, just 
the daemon started:


r...@sede:/# pmap 26858
26858:   /usr/sbin/named -c /etc/bind/named.conf
[ ]
total 6644K
r...@sede:/#


   with 9.4.3, compiled the exact way 9.5.0-P2 was compiled, threads 
disabled, the very same config file.


r...@sede:/etc/init.d# pmap 27726
27726:   /usr/sbin/named -c /etc/bind/named.conf
[ . ]
total 8056K
r...@sede:/etc/init.d#


   So, at least here, 9.4.3 seems to use more memory than 9.5.0-P2.

   i was thinking that maybe the fact i'm running on a MIPS and with 
uclibc (instead of common glibc) plataform has some difference on 
results you got from x86 platform  do you think this could have some 
relation to the memory usage ???



r...@sede:/# cat /proc/cpuinfo
system type : Atheros AR7130 rev 2 (id:0xa8)
processor   : 0
cpu model   : MIPS 24K V7.4


   just for information, i'm also running squid on this RouterBoard 
with 32Mb of RAM. After some config file tweaks, i got a stable memory 
usage of about 5,5-6Mb. And that's quite stable even during peak times. 
Of course all in-memory caches are disabled as well as disk-caches. 
Squid is just running for blocking somethings and logging. Anyway, on 
the same machine i did the memory usage tests above, squid seems to be 
doing very well, stable memory use.



--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: Where is the open recursion test?

2008-12-15 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães



Gregory Hicks escreveu:

Greetings:

Seeing in my named.log entries for too many timeouts resolving
'some-domain-not-seen-before'... makes me wonder if my server is an
open recursive server.

Where is the test please for open recursion so I can check?

  


http://dns.measurement-factory.com/cgi-bin/openresolvercheck.pl

--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-14 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães



JINMEI Tatuya /  escreveu:


question is  is there something i can do to low bind's memory 
usage and successfully run it on those very low embedded devices ???



Admittedly, BIND9 tends to require a lot of memory.  I'm not sure if
it can reasonably function with a total system memory of 32MB.

Some related points:
- if you enable threads, disable them.  With the thread support BIND9
  will require even more memory.
  

   yes threads are already disabled. Compilation is done this way:

CONFIGURE_ARGS += \
   --enable-shared \
   --enable-static \
   --enable-ipv6 \
   --with-randomdev=/dev/urandom \
   --disable-threads \
   --with-openssl=$(STAGING_DIR)/usr \
   --with-libtool \
   --with-libxml2=no \
   , \
   BUILD_CC=$(TARGET_CC) \



- max-cache-size 1048576 is a meaningless configuration:
 Any positive values less than 2MB will be ignored reset
 to 2MB.
  (from ARM)
  
   i do RTFM :)   and on the options section, max-cache-size 
description, there's nothing about that. But if you say so, i'm sure 
it's there somewhere :) I have done a quick search on 9.5 ARM and really 
didnt find it .


   anyway, i successfully found that validation on the code ... 
dns_cache_setcachesize and DNS_CACHE_MINSIZE . anything smaller than 
2Mb is replaced by 2Mb. Anyway, even the 1Mb being meaningless, it would 
force the DNS_CACHE_MINSIZE (2Mb) to be used and not the default one 
which is 32Mb. Even if the 1Mb parameter is ignored, the 2Mb would be 
something to me, comparing to 32Mb default one.


   anyway, thanks for the tip. I would never realize that.

--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it



___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

Re: bind memory usage

2008-12-14 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães



Peter Dambier escreveu:

I can confirm bind 9.4 does run on an (IBM, not Intel) 486-SCL/2 with 16 MB.
That cpu can address no more than 16 MB.

$ cat /proc/meminfo
total:used:free:  shared: buffers:  cached:
Mem:  14540800 10596352  398  3194880  1003520  3518464
  


   very good to know that 9.4 is running OK on a 16Mb machine, a 
situation even worst than mine, which is 32Mb :)   i'll try to 
install 9.4 this week instead of 9.5 and check if it has a slower memory 
footprint.


   thanks for the tip !!!

--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it




___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

bind memory usage

2008-12-13 Thread Leonardo Rodrigues Magalhães


   Hi,

   i'm trying to run bind 9.5.0-P2 on a very low memory system. It's a 
RouterBoard 450 with 32Mb RAM running OpenWRT.


r...@sede:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:29920 kB

   the problem is that bind seems to consume a LOT of memory ... well, 
a lot for low memory devices, i never noticed that on machines with GBs 
of RAM.


   Right after starting, bind uses 15% of my system memory, which would 
be about almost 4,5Mb. And memory usage grows when requests are being 
answered. I have seen bind using 25% of my memory, which would be about 
7.5Mb. Of course there's all the cache stuff, which i tried to limit with:


max-cache-size 1048576;

   but it didnt helped much  even with very few thing stored on 
cache, which i can check with 'rndc stats', bind memory keeps growing to 
unnaceptable levels given my very low memory resources. rndc flush, 
which should empty the cache, simply didnt low memory usage, thus 
showing that it's not the cache that's eating that much memory.


   just for comparison, maradns, another caching nameserver (not simply 
dns forwarder, it's a recursive server) that i'm used to run on OpenWRT, 
has a memory usage of about 1Mb and it didnt vary too much from that. Of 
course maradns dont have LOOOTS of features bind has  but i'm really 
interested on running bind because i'll have to configure some DNSSec 
verifications and none of these 'small' DNS servers do that.


   question is  is there something i can do to low bind's memory 
usage and successfully run it on those very low embedded devices ???


--


Atenciosamente / Sincerily,
Leonardo Rodrigues
Solutti Tecnologia
http://www.solutti.com.br

Minha armadilha de SPAM, NÃO mandem email
gertru...@solutti.com.br
My SPAMTRAP, do not email it





___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users