Re: I'm having thousands of queries a domain isc.org and this increases my cpu percentage to 100%. That may be happening and how I can control this? is an attack? attachment of the log I made an updat

2013-04-16 Thread Kebba Foon
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 05:27 -0400, Barry Margolin wrote:
 In article mailman.130.1366101804.20661.bind-us...@lists.isc.org,
  Matus UHLAR - fantomas uh...@fantomas.sk wrote:
 
  they apparently expect your nameserver to provide resursive DNS service for
  your company while it may not be intended for that use...  some customers
  (well, not only customers...) do not understand the difference between
  authoritative and recursive DNS service and may try to use servers for
  purpose not intended.  Some may also complain if the service does not work
  properly
 
 If they were using his server as a resolver, wouldn't he see queries for 
 lots of random hostnames (including popular domains like www.google.com, 
 www.yahoo.com, etc.), not just isc.org?
 

These seems like some attack going on, after reading the mails i also
check my recursive server and found a lot of these in my logs:

16-Apr-2013 11:31:35.743 security: info: client 101.226.167.13#55818:
query (cache) 'xliar.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:35.776 security: info: client 101.226.167.13#53710:
query (cache) 'www.baidu.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:35.813 security: info: client 182.118.40.31#42505:
query (cache) 'www.baidu.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.187 security: info: client 220.181.156.90#59278:
query (cache) 'hao.360.cn/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.225 security: info: client 220.181.156.90#50194:
query (cache) 'www.360.cn/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.253 security: info: client 220.181.156.90#33551:
query (cache) 'www.so.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.574 security: info: client 182.118.40.31#36470:
query (cache) 'xliar.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.587 security: info: client 182.118.40.31#51191:
query (cache) 'www.so.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.691 security: info: client 117.21.187.20#47169:
query (cache) 'hao.360.cn/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.705 security: info: client 183.60.211.65#32809:
query (cache) 'www.so.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.722 security: info: client 117.21.187.20#54942:
query (cache) 'www.so.com/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.733 security: info: client 117.21.187.20#50493:
query (cache) 'down.360.cn/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.761 security: info: client 182.118.40.31#54391:
query (cache) 'hao.360.cn/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.762 security: info: client 120.128.6.42#56439:
query (cache) 'down.360.cn/A/IN' denied
16-Apr-2013 11:31:36.798 security: info: client 120.128.6.42#52172:
query (cache) 'www.360.cn/A/IN' denied

my server is not an open recursive server its only open to my clients
and these are not even from my country.

Kebba

___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: I'm having thousands of queries a domain isc.org and this increases my cpu percentage to 100%. That may be happening and how I can control this? is an attack? attachment of the log I made an updat

2013-04-16 Thread Kebba Foon
On Tue, 2013-04-16 at 13:00 +0100, Phil Mayers wrote:
 On 16/04/13 12:41, Kebba Foon wrote:
 
  my server is not an open recursive server its only open to my clients
  and these are not even from my country.
 
 
 You're right, it's probably a spoofed-source DNS amplification attack.
 
 If your DNS server isn't open (good to hear) you could consider just 
 ACLing it at your network border.
 
 Alternatively, you could consider the RRL patches to bind.
These looks definitely like an attack, its the same thing on both my
recursive servers just check the other now and saw the same queries.


 ___
 Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
 from this list
 
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


___
Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe 
from this list

bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


limiting number of recursion/queries per IP address

2010-10-26 Thread Kebba Foon
Dear List,

Is is possible to limit the number of recursion/queries per IP address.
there is some kind of virus thats bombarding my dns servers with a lot
of queries, i realize that when ever the total number of recursion
clients reach 1000 dns resolution stop working. i have increase the
recursive-clients to 1 but still these those not help. and also i
have increase the number of max open files on my OS which at one point
was complaining about too many open files. can someone please direct me
to how best to solve this problem its some kind of DDOS.

Thanks
Kebba

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


RE: limiting number of recursion/queries per IP address

2010-10-26 Thread Kebba Foon
On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 15:22 -0400, Todd Snyder wrote:
 What version of bind, on what OS?
 
I use Debian 5.0 with bind 9.6-ESV-R1 but also i thought that the OS
might have some security holes so i try FreeBSD 8.1 with BIND 9.7.1 but
still have ihave the same problems.

 here may be some things you can do with iptables to limit connections
 
 http://www.debian-administration.org/articles/187
 
i will just look into these but it done thing iptables will be the ideal
solution.
 I don't recall seeing anything native to BIND that would allow for limits per 
 src.
 
 t.
 
 -Original Message-
 From: bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org 
 [mailto:bind-users-bounces+tsnyder=rim@lists.isc.org] On Behalf Of Kebba 
 Foon
 Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 2:27 PM
 To: bind-users@lists.isc.org
 Subject: limiting number of recursion/queries per IP address
 
 Dear List,
 
 Is is possible to limit the number of recursion/queries per IP address.
 there is some kind of virus thats bombarding my dns servers with a lot
 of queries, i realize that when ever the total number of recursion
 clients reach 1000 dns resolution stop working. i have increase the
 recursive-clients to 1 but still these those not help. and also i
 have increase the number of max open files on my OS which at one point
 was complaining about too many open files. can someone please direct me
 to how best to solve this problem its some kind of DDOS.
 
 Thanks
 Kebba
 
 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
 
 -
 This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
 information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
 solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
 information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
 recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
 please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
 system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this 
 transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: DNS issue

2010-08-30 Thread Kebba Foon
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 10:22 +0100, Agarwal Vivek-RNGB36 wrote:
 Hi All
 
 I am using ISC-BIND 9.3.4 as a DNS Server. Im facing an issue that Im
 getting lot of Queries as like  Root: type NS, class IN. This is
 leading to high CPU Utilization of my system. Can anyone help me that
 how can I solve this issue and why these requests will be coming
 
 Regards
 Vivek Aggarwal
 
try to use and access list on your bind.
 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: recursing stop at about 1000 clients

2010-07-19 Thread Kebba Foon
Thanks for the tips,

i once saw this errors on my log file, too  many files open  but i
fix that with setting ulimit -n 1824. i will try to donwload the
bind-9.7.1-P2.

On Sun, 2010-07-18 at 08:20 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
 On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 08:41 +, Kebba Foon wrote: 
  am running 9.6-ESV-R1 on Debian 5.0 lenny
  
 
 You might need to ensure your operating system can handle more than
 1024 file descriptors as it sounds like it is not, but the logs should
 reflect this, this could be your problem, if it's not, then, I can see
 no reason for this, although I do not use debian, I suggest you grab
 the latest source and stop using antiquated deb packages, most people
 I know who are even 'fanantical debian nuts' ,resolve their problems
 right away by using the source.
 ftp://ftp.isc.org/isc/bind9/9.7.1-P2/bind-9.7.1-P2.tar.gz   and try
 that. 
 
 
 BTW, as you're using Evolution, hitting Control-L will set up a reply
 to list :)
 
 Cheers
 
 ___
 bind-users mailing list
 bind-users@lists.isc.org
 https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: recursing stop at about 1000 clients

2010-07-15 Thread Kebba Foon
i did i set my recursive-clients to 1 but it does not help.

On Thu, 2010-07-15 at 20:21 +1000, Noel Butler wrote:
 UDP

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


recursing stop at about 1000 clients

2010-07-14 Thread Kebba Foon
Hi List

i have been having issues with my dns server for a while now,
my server suddently stops answering to queries. i notice that this
happen when every my recursive clients is more that a thousand, as per
the result of rndc status. any help about this will highly be welcome

Thanks
Kebba

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Re: Bind DNS server not resloving

2010-07-08 Thread Kebba Foon
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 10:37 +0200, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
 Hello,
 
 please, if you are writing a new post, send it as new mail and not
 as reply/followup on old mail. It makes people with threading clients
 angry and they can also in such case miss your e-mail.
 Thank you.
 
 On 07.07.10 20:43, Kebba Foon wrote:
  Subject: Bind DNS server not resloving
  From: Kebba Foon kebba.f...@qcell.gm
  To: bind-us...@isc.org
  In-Reply-To: 1278507529.20977.20.ca...@hoth.netnod.se
  References: 1278501226.20977.7.ca...@hoth.netnod.se
  20100707124157.190...@gmx.net
  1278507529.20977.20.ca...@hoth.netnod.se
  Date: Wed, 07 Jul 2010 20:43:29 +
 
  I have been experience DNS resolutions problems these past few days, if
  i run nslookup i get this error: 
  ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
 
 
  with dig +trace i get:
  

  ;  DiG 9.6-ESV-R1  @my ns server ip espn.com +trace
 
 Combining +trace and @server is useless, either you want to trace, or you
 want to query specified server.
 
I dont want to query a specific server, this is my cache server that i
cant run any query from am trying to figure out why i cant query using
my server.

  ;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached
  
  am not sure exectly whats is causing these time outs, the strange thing
  is that it works sometimes for a brief time and stop.
 
 apparently the server does not answer, or it does not get answers
 (but I think in the latter case it sends SERVFAIL).
 
  my server is Debian 5.0 lenny and the bind version running on it is
  9.9.6-ESV-R1.
 
 9.6.ESV-R1 you mean.
 yes  i meant 9.6.ESV-R1
but i upgraded to 9.7.1 yesterday
 

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


Bind DNS server not resloving

2010-07-07 Thread Kebba Foon

Hi

I have been experience DNS resolutions problems these past few days, if
i run nslookup i get this error: 
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

with dig +trace i get:


;  DiG 9.6-ESV-R1  @my ns server ip espn.com +trace
; (1 server found)
;; global options: +cmd
;; connection timed out; no servers could be reached

am not sure exectly whats is causing these time outs, the strange thing
is that it works sometimes for a brief time and stop.

The network does not seems to be the problem as i can run a traceroute
from the server and also if i run a traceroute from dnsstuff.com


my server is Debian 5.0 lenny and the bind version running on it is
9.9.6-ESV-R1.

any help will be greatly appreciated.

Thanks



___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


error: isc_socket_create: fcntl/reserved: Too many open files

2010-06-07 Thread kebba . foon

Hi list,
i keep having this error repeatedly on my bind 9.5.1-P3 and it crash my
server am using debian lenny 5.0 and there is not upgrade for bind on
thier repository. any help thanks

07-Jun-2010 17:04:08.058 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
07-Jun-2010 17:04:08.075 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
07-Jun-2010 17:04:08.150 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
07-Jun-2010 17:04:08.156 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
07-Jun-2010 17:04:08.163 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
07-Jun-2010 17:04:08.180 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
07-Jun-2010 17:04:08.189 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files

Kebba



___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users


bind security: warning

2010-06-04 Thread kebba . foon
Dear list
am using BIND 9.5.1-P3 recently am been have lots of issues with my cache
server. at one point it was not resolving any queries. please help, this
is the log that keeps showing up on my server,

04-Jun-2010 19:20:47.200 security: warning: client 41.223.214.27#8222: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 105.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:20:50.279 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 22.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:20:52.196 security: warning: client 41.223.214.25#6394: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 100.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:20:52.820 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 6.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:20:53.226 security: warning: client 196.46.239.37#49803:
RFC 1918 response from Internet for 107.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:20:54.403 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 49.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:21:02.701 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 46.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:21:06.560 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 19.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:21:09.455 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 65.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:21:12.939 security: warning: client 196.46.235.46#64502:
RFC 1918 response from Internet for 1.0.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:21:39.691 security: warning: client 41.223.214.26#17391:
RFC 1918 response from Internet for 54.2.225.10.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:21:55.762 security: warning: client 196.46.239.37#49803:
RFC 1918 response from Internet for 107.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:22:06.800 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 19.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:22:14.439 security: warning: client 41.223.214.27#8436: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 34.3.225.10.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:22:16.639 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#63154: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 38.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:22:19.387 security: warning: client 41.223.214.25#6394: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 102.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:22:19.810 security: warning: client 196.46.233.8#34578: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 6.81.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:22:19.992 security: warning: client 196.46.239.7#51996: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 100.1.168.192.in-addr.arpa
04-Jun-2010 19:22:24.889 security: warning: client 41.223.214.27#8473: RFC
1918 response from Internet for 111.1.225.10.in-addr.arpa


and before this was the error i was having:
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.773 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.774 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.774 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.774 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.817 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.817 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.818 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.818 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.834 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.835 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.835 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.835 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.835 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files
04-Jun-2010 14:12:38.863 general: error: isc_socket_create:
fcntl/reserved: Too many open files

i ran ulimit -n 8192 and that seems to have solve that error

___
bind-users mailing list
bind-users@lists.isc.org
https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users