Re: bind version problem
On 7/19/11 9:30 AM, almah...@ranksitt.net almah...@ranksitt.net wrote: Hi, If Bind version of primary dns is bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 and for secondary dns bind-9.5.0-29.b2.fc9.i386. Is there create any problem?? In general, it creates no problem. If you happen to use an RR for which support was added in 9.5, then you might have odd results. Is it mandatory the same version for primary and secondary DNS. No. It's not even mandatory that the primary and secondary both be running bind. -- Daniel J McDonald, CCIE # 2495, CISSP # 78281 ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: bind version problem
On Tue, Jul 19, 2011 at 08:30:17PM +0600, almah...@ranksitt.net almah...@ranksitt.net wrote a message of 18 lines which said: Is it mandatory the same version for primary and secondary DNS. It is not even mandatory for all the authoritative name servers to run BIND. They can be of different brands. That's the beauty of standard protocols. ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: bind version problem
If Bind version of primary dns is bind-libs-9.3.6-16.P1.el5 and for secondary dns bind-9.5.0-29.b2.fc9.i386. Something wrong there: libs vs. server, but I assume you mean server for both. Is it mandatory the same version for primary and secondary DNS. Not unless you rely on a particular feature of the higher version. -JP ___ Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to unsubscribe from this list bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
