Re: dig error
On Tue, Mar 10, 2009 at 05:57:31PM +0700, jittinan suwanrueangsri jittin...@gmail.com wrote a message of 254 lines which said: Dear sir Why sir? There are certainly ladies here, too. [r...@localhost ~]# dig @10.10.91.201 www.test.work +trace I believe that, when using, +trace, the server mentioned as an argument for @, is used only for bootstrapping (getting the answer to the query NS .) After that, dig asks the default resolver for the addresses of name servers. (You can check with tcpdump.) If I'm right, your best solution would be to set up a resolver which uses your root and to direct name resolution at it. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
Re: dig error
On 10.03.09 08:55, Jeff Lightner wrote: You'd prefer maybe Dear Buttheads? pure hello should be just enough. Dear Sir (or Dear Sirs) is considered standard business usage for correspondence when one isn't sure who will be reading what was sent. While it is certainly not usual to do it for an email (especially to a list like this) I see no reason to chide someone for doing it. What about irony? Hello is shorter, simpler and more common on the net, expecially in mailing lists... and he -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. I drive way too fast to worry about cholesterol. ___ bind-users mailing list bind-users@lists.isc.org https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
