Re: [Bioc-devel] transfer maintainer status of gCrisprTools

2019-11-26 Thread Russell Bainer
Great, thanks!

-R

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 1:07 PM Turaga, Nitesh <
nitesh.tur...@roswellpark.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You should be able to access your package once you activate your
> BiocCredentials account and activate it.
>
> Best
>
> Nitesh
>
> > On Nov 26, 2019, at 3:54 PM, Russell Bainer 
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Nitesh,
> >
> > Please associate it with russ.bai...@gmail.com.
> >
> > Thanks very much. I think that I will also need to associate my github
> account (RussBainer), but i see that there is a FAQ about that and will
> contact you in due course if I'm not able to access it.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > -Russ
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:09 PM Turaga, Nitesh <
> nitesh.tur...@roswellpark.org> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Which email would Russ like to use as his email account with
> BiocCredentials?
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Nitesh
> >
> > > On Nov 22, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Peter Haverty <
> peterhave...@ucdavis-alumni.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > I'd like to transfer gCrisprTools to Russ Bainer (
> russ.bai...@gmail.com,
> > > rbai...@mazetx.com). How do I do that?
> > >
> > >   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> > >
> > > ___
> > > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
> >
> >
> >
> > This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
> information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
> recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
>
>
>
> This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
> information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
> recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] transfer maintainer status of gCrisprTools

2019-11-26 Thread Russell Bainer
Hello Nitesh,

Please associate it with russ.bai...@gmail.com.

Thanks very much. I think that I will also need to associate my github
account (RussBainer), but i see that there is a FAQ about that and will
contact you in due course if I'm not able to access it.

Best Regards,

-Russ

On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:09 PM Turaga, Nitesh <
nitesh.tur...@roswellpark.org> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Which email would Russ like to use as his email account with
> BiocCredentials?
>
> Best,
>
> Nitesh
>
> > On Nov 22, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Peter Haverty <
> peterhave...@ucdavis-alumni.com> wrote:
> >
> > I'd like to transfer gCrisprTools to Russ Bainer (russ.bai...@gmail.com,
> > rbai...@mazetx.com). How do I do that?
> >
> >   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> >
> > ___
> > Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> > https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
>
>
> This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
> information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
> recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
>

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages may be archived

2019-11-26 Thread James W. MacDonald
Hi Lori,

Let me know if you don't hear from Benilton. It shouldn't be much work to
fix oligo - we could convert to using Gviz for the graphic that is
currently using GenomeGraphs. I can make the change next week if necessary.

Best,

Jim



On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 12:57 PM Shepherd, Lori <
lori.sheph...@roswellpark.org> wrote:

> typo -  heatplus and topGO have responded directly.
>
>
> Lori Shepherd
>
> Bioconductor Core Team
>
> Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
>
> Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
>
> Elm & Carlton Streets
>
> Buffalo, New York 14263
>
> 
> From: Bioc-devel  on behalf of
> Shepherd, Lori 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:54 PM
> To: Henrik Bengtsson ;
> bioc-devel@r-project.org 
> Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11
> packages may be archived
>
> All of these package have been notified from the Bioconductor side as
> well.  We hope the maintainers will respond shortly.
> heatmap and topGO  have responded directly and are working on fixes.  I
> hope the others are too.
>
>
>
> Lori Shepherd
>
> Bioconductor Core Team
>
> Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center
>
> Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics
>
> Elm & Carlton Streets
>
> Buffalo, New York 14263
>
> 
> From: Bioc-devel  on behalf of Henrik
> Bengtsson 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:47 PM
> To: bioc-devel@r-project.org 
> Subject: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages
> may be archived
>
> In case it's not known, paraphrasing from CRAN notification email,
> CRAN [sic!] packages:
>
>   TROM, demi, diffMeanVar, maGUI, metaboGSE
>
> risk being archived on December 7 because broken Bioconductor dependencies:
>
>   Heatplus, missMethyl, oligo, oligoClasses, topGO
>
> prevent pdInfoBuilder from being installed.
>
> I don't maintain any of the above - I'm just the messenger.
>
> /Henrik
>
> ___
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
>
> This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
> information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
> recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ___
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>
>
> This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential
> information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or
> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended
> recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying,
> distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have
> received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> e-mail and delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
> [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
>
> ___
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
>


-- 
James W. MacDonald, M.S.
Biostatistician
University of Washington
Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
4225 Roosevelt Way NE, # 100
Seattle WA 98105-6099

[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] transfer maintainer status of gCrisprTools

2019-11-26 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
Hi,

Which email would Russ like to use as his email account with BiocCredentials?

Best,

Nitesh 

> On Nov 22, 2019, at 5:11 PM, Peter Haverty  
> wrote:
> 
> I'd like to transfer gCrisprTools to Russ Bainer (russ.bai...@gmail.com,
> rbai...@mazetx.com). How do I do that?
> 
>   [[alternative HTML version deleted]]
> 
> ___
> Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
> https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel



This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages may be archived

2019-11-26 Thread Shepherd, Lori
typo -  heatplus and topGO have responded directly.


Lori Shepherd

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263


From: Bioc-devel  on behalf of Shepherd, Lori 

Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:54 PM
To: Henrik Bengtsson ; bioc-devel@r-project.org 

Subject: Re: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages 
may be archived

All of these package have been notified from the Bioconductor side as well.  We 
hope the maintainers will respond shortly.
heatmap and topGO  have responded directly and are working on fixes.  I hope 
the others are too.



Lori Shepherd

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263


From: Bioc-devel  on behalf of Henrik 
Bengtsson 
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:47 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org 
Subject: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages may 
be archived

In case it's not known, paraphrasing from CRAN notification email,
CRAN [sic!] packages:

  TROM, demi, diffMeanVar, maGUI, metaboGSE

risk being archived on December 7 because broken Bioconductor dependencies:

  Heatplus, missMethyl, oligo, oligoClasses, topGO

prevent pdInfoBuilder from being installed.

I don't maintain any of the above - I'm just the messenger.

/Henrik

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages may be archived

2019-11-26 Thread Shepherd, Lori
All of these package have been notified from the Bioconductor side as well.  We 
hope the maintainers will respond shortly.
heatmap and topGO  have responded directly and are working on fixes.  I hope 
the others are too.



Lori Shepherd

Bioconductor Core Team

Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center

Department of Biostatistics & Bioinformatics

Elm & Carlton Streets

Buffalo, New York 14263


From: Bioc-devel  on behalf of Henrik 
Bengtsson 
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2019 12:47 PM
To: bioc-devel@r-project.org 
Subject: [Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages may 
be archived

In case it's not known, paraphrasing from CRAN notification email,
CRAN [sic!] packages:

  TROM, demi, diffMeanVar, maGUI, metaboGSE

risk being archived on December 7 because broken Bioconductor dependencies:

  Heatplus, missMethyl, oligo, oligoClasses, topGO

prevent pdInfoBuilder from being installed.

I don't maintain any of the above - I'm just the messenger.

/Henrik

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] CRAN packages depending on broken Bioc 3.11 packages may be archived

2019-11-26 Thread Henrik Bengtsson
In case it's not known, paraphrasing from CRAN notification email,
CRAN [sic!] packages:

  TROM, demi, diffMeanVar, maGUI, metaboGSE

risk being archived on December 7 because broken Bioconductor dependencies:

  Heatplus, missMethyl, oligo, oligoClasses, topGO

prevent pdInfoBuilder from being installed.

I don't maintain any of the above - I'm just the messenger.

/Henrik

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] Submitting a package with heavy data and vignette

2019-11-26 Thread Martin Morgan
rather than aiming for an a large ExperimentData package it might make more 
sense to create an ExperimentHub package, with the data hosted in the cloud for 
download-on-demand. It is cached locally so the download cost is only paid 
once. This is especially useful if your data consist of several sets, and only 
one is needed for the purposes of the vignette. In general it seems like a 
better strategy, since it makes it easier on mirrors (and our git server) to 
host the package.

http://bioconductor.org/packages/devel/bioc/vignettes/ExperimentHub/inst/doc/CreateAnExperimentHubPackage.html

I wanted to mention though that *many* authors have said 'my data is too big 
and I can't do a realistic vignette', only to in the long run come up with a 
real-enough example that exercises their package. This is tremendously valuable 
to the user, who can walk through tough areas of package functionality 
illustrated in the vignette, without having to invest excessive compute time.

Martin

On 11/26/19, 8:54 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Turaga, Nitesh" 
 
wrote:

Hi,

I think this is a good path forward.  Please take a look at the link below 
which will provide further guidelines for you,
 
http://bioconductor.org/developers/package-guidelines/#data

https://bioconductor.org/developers/package-submission/#experPackage


https://github.com/Bioconductor/Contributions/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#submitting-related-packages

Best regards,

Nitesh 

On 11/26/19, 8:25 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Joris Meys" 
 wrote:

Dear,


we're planning on submitting a new package to Bioconductor. Due to the 
fact that this package revolves around simulation methods for massive datasets, 
the vignette necessarily need about 10 Mb of data and way more than 5 minutes 
to build. We were wondering how we would proceed best to submit this package. 
Downsizing the data and build time is alas not possible, as it would make the 
example in the vignette totally irrelevant.


I was thinking about the following construct:

- a main software package with the actual simulation functionality

- a "data" package depending on the main software package with only the 
example data and vignette.


We would love to hear your view on this, as we'd like to limit the 
amount of issues for both you and us once we submit the package(s). Other 
suggestions are more than welcome too.


Thank you in advance

Joris


--
Joris Meys
Statistical consultant

Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling
Ghent University
Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Gent (Belgium)
--

Disclaimer : http://helpdesk.ugent.be/e-maildisclaimer.php


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel




This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] Submitting a package with heavy data and vignette

2019-11-26 Thread Turaga, Nitesh
Hi,

I think this is a good path forward.  Please take a look at the link below 
which will provide further guidelines for you,
 
http://bioconductor.org/developers/package-guidelines/#data

https://bioconductor.org/developers/package-submission/#experPackage

https://github.com/Bioconductor/Contributions/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#submitting-related-packages

Best regards,

Nitesh 

On 11/26/19, 8:25 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Joris Meys" 
 wrote:

Dear,


we're planning on submitting a new package to Bioconductor. Due to the fact 
that this package revolves around simulation methods for massive datasets, the 
vignette necessarily need about 10 Mb of data and way more than 5 minutes to 
build. We were wondering how we would proceed best to submit this package. 
Downsizing the data and build time is alas not possible, as it would make the 
example in the vignette totally irrelevant.


I was thinking about the following construct:

- a main software package with the actual simulation functionality

- a "data" package depending on the main software package with only the 
example data and vignette.


We would love to hear your view on this, as we'd like to limit the amount 
of issues for both you and us once we submit the package(s). Other suggestions 
are more than welcome too.


Thank you in advance

Joris


--
Joris Meys
Statistical consultant

Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling
Ghent University
Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Gent (Belgium)
--

Disclaimer : http://helpdesk.ugent.be/e-maildisclaimer.php


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel




This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] Submitting a package with heavy data and vignette

2019-11-26 Thread Joris Meys
Dear,


we're planning on submitting a new package to Bioconductor. Due to the fact 
that this package revolves around simulation methods for massive datasets, the 
vignette necessarily need about 10 Mb of data and way more than 5 minutes to 
build. We were wondering how we would proceed best to submit this package. 
Downsizing the data and build time is alas not possible, as it would make the 
example in the vignette totally irrelevant.


I was thinking about the following construct:

- a main software package with the actual simulation functionality

- a "data" package depending on the main software package with only the example 
data and vignette.


We would love to hear your view on this, as we'd like to limit the amount of 
issues for both you and us once we submit the package(s). Other suggestions are 
more than welcome too.


Thank you in advance

Joris


--
Joris Meys
Statistical consultant

Department of Data Analysis and Mathematical Modelling
Ghent University
Coupure Links 653, B-9000 Gent (Belgium)
--

Disclaimer : http://helpdesk.ugent.be/e-maildisclaimer.php


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel