Re: [Bioc-devel] EXTERNAL: Author/maintainer field no longer accepted.

2020-08-10 Thread Interdonato, Kayla
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. The package guidelines should now 
reflect this change.

Best,
Kayla

On 8/10/20, 5:06 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Manders-2, F.M." 
 wrote:

Hi All,

R BiocCheck no longer seems to accept a Author/Maintainer field. 
(https://github.com/Bioconductor/BiocCheck/commit/e0176f6591c771774f6cb05d4ff8bc1b145ad10e)

* Checking for valid maintainer...
* ERROR: Remove Maintainer field. Use Authors@R [cre] designation.

However, the package guidelines 
(https://www.bioconductor.org/developers/package-guidelines/) still say that a 
Author/Maintainer field is allowed:
Authors@R or Author/Maintainer:” fields: Use either Authors@R field or 
Author: and Maintainer: fields, not both.

I think the guidelines need to be updated.

With kind regards,
Freek Manders


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel



This email message may contain legally privileged and/or confidential 
information.  If you are not the intended recipient(s), or the employee or 
agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended 
recipient(s), you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, 
distribution, or use of this email message is prohibited.  If you have received 
this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by e-mail and 
delete this email message from your computer. Thank you.
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


Re: [Bioc-devel] msa: call for help/support

2020-08-10 Thread Martin Morgan
Hi Ulrich -- 

Certainly msa provides very useful functionality not present in other 
Bioconductor packages.

It's not possible for the Bioconductor core team to take on additional 
maintenance responsibilities; the best bet is to find someone else in the 
community willing and able to maintain the package.

If that person does not step forward, then we can proceed with the deprecation 
process.

Martin

On 7/28/20, 6:02 AM, "Bioc-devel on behalf of Ulrich Bodenhofer" 
 wrote:

Dear Lori, dear Martin, dear Hervé,
[I am mentioning you personally, since you are the Core Team members I 
had personal contact with in the past]
dear Bioconductor Core Team,

This is an open letter to you and the Bioconductor community ... my 
letter concerns the 'msa' package of which I am the maintainer. You are 
probably aware that this package wraps three major multiple sequence 
alignment algorithms in one Bioconductor/R package. This standard 
functionality had not been available in that way in a Bioconductor 
package prior to its release. It is, therefore, frequently used (rank 
135 of 1879 packages; currently ~2,000 downloads per month) and the 
corresponding application note in 'Bioinformatics' 
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv494) has gained quite a few 
citations on Google Scholar so far (tendency still increasing).

I do not want to bother you with details too much, but just a few words 
about what this package is internally: it is a wrapper around three 
commonly used algorithms. All of these have been published as research 
prototypes, as (crude!) source code for user self-compilation under 
Linux/Unix. It was quite an effort to make these three complex libraries 
run on all three major platforms (and to get rid of their memory leaks). 
While the package has worked smoothly for several years now, due to the 
progression of R (and also gcc), some issues with Makefiles and 
configure scripts have come up that overwhelm me and my competencies. I 
should also mention that I am no longer active in the bioinformatics 
field and my students who did most of the implementation work are long 
gone. The fact remains that 'msa' currently produces check and build 
errors on the Windows platform (both release and devel; further issues 
have been brought up by Brian Ripley concerning build errors with gcc 10 
on Fedora), and I feel unable to fix them.

Now my question: would the Bioconductor Core Team be willing to take 
over the 'msa' package? I am sure there are members who are much more 
proficient in dealing with compiler flags, configure scripts and all 
that stuff than me. I am also convinced (1) that it makes good sense if 
such a crucial functionality like sequence alignment is in the hands of 
the Core Team, (2) that it would be a great loss to the Bioconductor 
project if the package died, and (3) that the Core Team will have great 
ideas for further improvements of the package.

What I can offer:

  * That you will have full control over the package and its future. I
will not intervene in any way.
  * My long-term support if you have questions regarding the details of
the current version.

What I am asking from you:

  * Take good care of the package.
  * Otherwise: nothing special, but I would be grateful if the paper
(see link above) would remain to be cited in the package (e.g. in
the vignette and in the CITATION file).

I am eager to hear/read your response, thank you very much in advance!

Best regards,
Ulrich

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel
___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel


[Bioc-devel] Author/maintainer field no longer accepted.

2020-08-10 Thread Manders-2, F.M.
Hi All,

R BiocCheck no longer seems to accept a Author/Maintainer field. 
(https://github.com/Bioconductor/BiocCheck/commit/e0176f6591c771774f6cb05d4ff8bc1b145ad10e)

* Checking for valid maintainer...
* ERROR: Remove Maintainer field. Use Authors@R [cre] designation.

However, the package guidelines 
(https://www.bioconductor.org/developers/package-guidelines/) still say that a 
Author/Maintainer field is allowed:
Authors@R or Author/Maintainer:” fields: Use either Authors@R field or Author: 
and Maintainer: fields, not both.

I think the guidelines need to be updated.

With kind regards,
Freek Manders


[[alternative HTML version deleted]]

___
Bioc-devel@r-project.org mailing list
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/bioc-devel