В Wed, 23 Sep 2020 15:10:22 -0700 Jeremy via bitcoin-dev <bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> It's not particularly important that a transaction be in the same > block once sponsored, it could also be in the last 100 blocks (the > opposite of proposed change 3). This will in effect enable "inverse timelock" mechanism for up to 100 blocks for sponsor transactions: broadcast a transaction A, and then make a pre-signed sponsor transaction B that sponsors A. Transaction B will become invalid after 100 blocks due to this rule. If you put a timelock on B to make it valid after 50 blocks, then it will be valid between block 50 and 100 after A is confirmed. _______________________________________________ bitcoin-dev mailing list bitcoin-dev@lists.linuxfoundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/bitcoin-dev
