[Bitcoin-development] vtxPrev

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Grønager
Hi !

I am looking into enabling a split between thin clients holding the wallet and 
server(s) holding the blocks and txdb.

To that end I am considering to simplify the WalletTx a bit and I came across 
the vtxPrev in the code. As I see it vtxPrev is only used for keeping a list of 
supporting transactions to enable resubmit of these in case the transaction it 
self and all its supporting transactions are lost due to some blocks becoming 
invalid as they are part of a dead-end part of the chain. However...

The vtxPrev stores 3 transactions back, but as transactions need 7 block to 
maturity and respendability isn't it overkill - I mean it is highly unlikely 
that a transaction gets invalid after 7 confirmations and the vtxPrev are 
guarding against resubmission of transaction more than 21 confirmations back. 
Further, we cannot guarantee that the transaction owner is online at the time 
and the money could have been re-spent for others anyway.

So bottom line:
Do we need the vtxPrev at all ? Or did I miss out something ?

Cheers,

Michael



--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] vtxPrev

2011-10-05 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Michael Grønager  wrote:
> The vtxPrev stores 3 transactions back, but as transactions need 7 block to 
> maturity and respendability isn't it overkill - I mean it is highly unlikely 
> that a transaction gets invalid after 7 confirmations and

They don't need 7 blocks to maturity and respendability. The software
will attempt to use older inputs when available but if not it will use
what it has.  It's also prone to respending its own outputs quickly
because it reasonably trusts that it won't doublespend its own
transactions.

And, yes, if there is a deep split then its possible that inputs might
have been spent differently in the new split. But it's not especially
likely. Retransmitting one of your own txn's parents if its dropped
but not yet impossible sounds prudent to me.

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] vtxPrev

2011-10-05 Thread Michael Grønager
Oups - I was reading the code wrongly - going through AddSupportingTransactions 
carefully again...

The vtxPrev contains a list of the supporting confirmations up to 3 
confirmations back. So it is only of relevance (and only gets filled) if you 
accept coins that are less than 3 confirmations old. In this case you would 
like to resend the depending transactions to the network in case of chain 
splits.

This makes much more sense, but also, it is only of relevance when you accept 
newly earned coins. And it will only be of relevance for half an hour or so.

Cheers,

Michael



On 05/10/2011, at 14:50, Gregory Maxwell wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Michael Grønager  
> wrote:
>> The vtxPrev stores 3 transactions back, but as transactions need 7 block to 
>> maturity and respendability isn't it overkill - I mean it is highly unlikely 
>> that a transaction gets invalid after 7 confirmations and
> 
> They don't need 7 blocks to maturity and respendability. The software
> will attempt to use older inputs when available but if not it will use
> what it has.  It's also prone to respending its own outputs quickly
> because it reasonably trusts that it won't doublespend its own
> transactions.
> 
> And, yes, if there is a deep split then its possible that inputs might
> have been spent differently in the new split. But it's not especially
> likely. Retransmitting one of your own txn's parents if its dropped
> but not yet impossible sounds prudent to me.

Michael Gronager, PhD
Owner Ceptacle / NDGF Director, NORDUnet A/S
Jens Juels Gade 33
2100 Copenhagen E
Mobile: +45 31 62 14 01
E-mail: grona...@ceptacle.com



--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mac libboost_thread or thread-mt?

2011-10-05 Thread Matt Corallo
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 16:40 -0700, Brian McQueen wrote:
> I installed boost via the mac ports.  Its got lobboost_thread-mt, but
> it doesn't have libboost_thread.a. Should I modify the makefile or get
> a different version of boost?
> 

(from
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2293962/boost-libraries-in-multithreading-aware-mode)

The -mt suffix means built in multithreading aware mode (what this means
for a threading library I have no idea), however that suffix was removed
from Linux and Mac builds in 1.42.  If you are linking against 1.42+ on
Linux/Mac, adding/removing the -mt suffix means nothing AFAICT.

Matt


--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] Transaction Delivery and Storage

2011-10-05 Thread Mike Hearn
I imagine a lot of the things on the contracts page will be implemented by
specialized software that interacts with the Bitcoin network directly.
Transactions would then be moved around, for example, by having clients do
HTTP POSTs of protocol buffers to servers that are listening and know how to
interpret the received messages.
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mac libboost_thread or thread-mt?

2011-10-05 Thread Gavin Andresen
I updated src/makefile.osx and doc/build-osx.txt  today, assuming that
the MacPorts versions of dependencies will be used and the -mt boost
libraries will be used.

I also modified makefile.unix and makefile.osx to auto-build
dependencies using gcc's  -MMD  option.

-- 
--
Gavin Andresen

--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] Mac libboost_thread or thread-mt?

2011-10-05 Thread Douglas Huff
Bad update. Macports has a couple of boost packages. Install the newer 1.46
ones.

-- 
Douglas Huff
On Oct 5, 2011 1:43 PM, "Gavin Andresen"  wrote:
> I updated src/makefile.osx and doc/build-osx.txt today, assuming that
> the MacPorts versions of dependencies will be used and the -mt boost
> libraries will be used.
>
> I also modified makefile.unix and makefile.osx to auto-build
> dependencies using gcc's -MMD option.
>
> --
> --
> Gavin Andresen
>
>
--
> All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
> definitive record of customers, application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
> ___
> Bitcoin-development mailing list
> Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development