Re: [Bitcoin-development] Possible attack: Keeping unconfirmed transactions

2014-06-06 Thread Toshi Morita
From what I know, Alice does not know to which node Bob will broadcast the
transaction. Therefore, Alice cannot intercept the transaction and prevent
the rest of the network from seeing it.

Toshi



On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:02 PM, Raúl Martínez r...@i-rme.es wrote:

 I dont know if this attack is even possible, it came to my mind and I will
 try to explain it as good as possible.

 Some transacions keep unconfirmed forever and finally they are purged by
 Bitcoin nodes, mostly due to the lack of fees.


 Example:
 -

 Alice is selling a pizza to Bob, Bob is now making the payment with
 Bitcoin.
 The main goal of this attack is to store a unconfirmed transaction send by
 Bob for a few days (it will not be included in the blockchain because it
 has no fee or due to other reason), Bob might resend the payment or might
 just cancel the deal with Alice.

 Bob forgets about that failed trade but a couple of days later, Alice, who
 has stored the signed transacion, relays the transaction to the network (or
 mines it directly with his own hashpower).
 Bob does not know what is happening, he believed that that transaction was
 canceled forever, he even does not remember the failed pizza deal.

 Alice has now the bitcoins and Bob does not know what happened with his
 money.

 -

 This might also work with the Payment Protocol because when using it Bob
 does not relay the transaction to the network, its Alices job to do it,
 Alice stores it and tells Bob to resend the payment, Bob creates another
 transaction (If has the same inputs as the first TX this does not work)
 (this one is relayed by Alice to the network).

 Alice comes back a couple of days later and mines with his hashrate the
 first transaction (the one she didnt relayed to the network).

 Alice now has two payments, Bob does not know what happened.


 ---

 I hope that I explained well this possible attack, I dont know if there is
 already a fix for this problem or if it is simply impossible to execute
 this kind of attack.

 Thanks for your time.






 --
 Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
 Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their
 applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
 this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
 ___
 Bitcoin-development mailing list
 Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their 
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, 
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] Another uninitialized memory problem

2014-06-03 Thread Toshi Morita
I looked at this a bit more yesterday, and it looks like both sides of the
comparison were uninitialized, and I fixed one side, but the other side has
the same problem.

I'll try to investigate further this afternoon once I get out of
meetings/meetings prep.

Toshi



On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 9:43 AM, Jeff Garzik jgar...@bitpay.com wrote:

 I think I see the problem.


 On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 4:01 PM, Toshi Morita to...@peernova.com wrote:
  I'm seeing another uninitialized memory problem in bitcoind using
 valgrind:
 
  tm@tm-VirtualBox:~/bitcoind/bitcoin/src$ valgrind ./bitcoind
  ==2337== Memcheck, a memory error detector
  ==2337== Copyright (C) 2002-2012, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
  ==2337== Using Valgrind-3.8.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright
 info
  ==2337== Command: ./bitcoind
  ==2337==
  ==2337== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
  ==2337==at 0x319176: CWallet::LoadKeyMetadata(CPubKey const,
  CKeyMetadata const) (wallet.cpp:110)
  ==2337==by 0x33645A: ReadKeyValue(CWallet*, CDataStream,
 CDataStream,
  CWalletScanState, std::string, std::string) (walletdb.cpp:509)
  ==2337==by 0x3374F0: CWalletDB::LoadWallet(CWallet*)
 (walletdb.cpp:623)
  ==2337==by 0x3218FD: CWallet::LoadWallet(bool) (wallet.cpp:1485)
  ==2337==by 0x157F16: AppInit2(boost::thread_group) (init.cpp:958)
  ==2337==by 0x140142: AppInit(int, char**) (bitcoind.cpp:143)
  ==2337==by 0x13649E: main (bitcoind.cpp:180)
  ==2337==
 
 
 
 --
  Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
  Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and
 their
  applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field,
  this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
  http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech
  ___
  Bitcoin-development mailing list
  Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
  https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development
 



 --
 Jeff Garzik
 Bitcoin core developer and open source evangelist
 BitPay, Inc.  https://bitpay.com/

--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their 
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, 
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


[Bitcoin-development] Another uninitialized memory problem

2014-06-02 Thread Toshi Morita
I'm seeing another uninitialized memory problem in bitcoind using valgrind:

tm@tm-VirtualBox:~/bitcoind/bitcoin/src$ valgrind ./bitcoind
==2337== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==2337== Copyright (C) 2002-2012, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==2337== Using Valgrind-3.8.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
==2337== Command: ./bitcoind
==2337==
==2337== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
==2337==at 0x319176: CWallet::LoadKeyMetadata(CPubKey const,
CKeyMetadata const) (wallet.cpp:110)
==2337==by 0x33645A: ReadKeyValue(CWallet*, CDataStream, CDataStream,
CWalletScanState, std::string, std::string) (walletdb.cpp:509)
==2337==by 0x3374F0: CWalletDB::LoadWallet(CWallet*) (walletdb.cpp:623)
==2337==by 0x3218FD: CWallet::LoadWallet(bool) (wallet.cpp:1485)
==2337==by 0x157F16: AppInit2(boost::thread_group) (init.cpp:958)
==2337==by 0x140142: AppInit(int, char**) (bitcoind.cpp:143)
==2337==by 0x13649E: main (bitcoind.cpp:180)
==2337==
--
Learn Graph Databases - Download FREE O'Reilly Book
Graph Databases is the definitive new guide to graph databases and their 
applications. Written by three acclaimed leaders in the field, 
this first edition is now available. Download your free book today!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/NeoTech___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


Re: [Bitcoin-development] bitcoind minor bug in wallet and possible fix

2014-05-29 Thread Toshi Morita
Ok. Done.

Toshi



On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Mark Friedenbach m...@monetize.io wrote:

 Please make a pull request on github. It'll likely get merged quickly.
 On May 29, 2014 5:04 PM, Toshi Morita to...@peernova.com wrote:

 I ran bitcoind under valgrind and found a place where it references an
 uninitialized variable in some cases:

 tm@tm-VirtualBox:~/bitcoind/bitcoin/src$ valgrind ./bitcoind
 ==2337== Memcheck, a memory error detector
 ==2337== Copyright (C) 2002-2012, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
 ==2337== Using Valgrind-3.8.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copyright info
 ==2337== Command: ./bitcoind
 ==2337==
 ==2337== Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s)
 ==2337==at 0x319176: CWallet::LoadKeyMetadata(CPubKey const,
 CKeyMetadata const) (wallet.cpp:110)
 ==2337==by 0x33645A: ReadKeyValue(CWallet*, CDataStream,
 CDataStream, CWalletScanState, std::string, std::string)
 (walletdb.cpp:509)
 ==2337==by 0x3374F0: CWalletDB::LoadWallet(CWallet*)
 (walletdb.cpp:623)
 ==2337==by 0x3218FD: CWallet::LoadWallet(bool) (wallet.cpp:1485)
 ==2337==by 0x157F16: AppInit2(boost::thread_group) (init.cpp:958)
 ==2337==by 0x140142: AppInit(int, char**) (bitcoind.cpp:143)
 ==2337==by 0x13649E: main (bitcoind.cpp:180)
 ==2337==

 The bug occurs here because nTimeFirstKey is not initialized when the
 wallet is instantiated:

 wallet.cpp:63
 if (!nTimeFirstKey || nCreationTime  nTimeFirstKey)
 nTimeFirstKey = nCreationTime;


 I fixed it in my fork:

 diff --git a/src/wallet.h b/src/wallet.h
 index 9607415..b78045f 100644
 --- a/src/wallet.h
 +++ b/src/wallet.h
 @@ -163,6 +163,7 @@ public:
  nOrderPosNext = 0;
  nNextResend = 0;
  nLastResend = 0;
 +nTimeFirstKey = 0;
  }

 If this fix is ok please pull from my GitHub fork; username on GitHub is
 tm314159.

 Toshi



 --
 Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
 www.restlet.com/download
 http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet
 ___
 Bitcoin-development mailing list
 Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
 https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development


--
Time is money. Stop wasting it! Get your web API in 5 minutes.
www.restlet.com/download
http://p.sf.net/sfu/restlet___
Bitcoin-development mailing list
Bitcoin-development@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bitcoin-development