Re: Python 3.2.2
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:24:11 -0500 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Are there any naming conflicts between python3 and python2? It looks like I have: /usr/bin: pydoc3 python3python3.2 python3.2m pydoc3.2 python3-config python3.2-config python3.2m-config /usr/lib: /usr/lib/libpython3.2m.so /usr/lib/libpython3.so /usr/lib/libpython3.2m.so.1.0 /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6.0.16-gdb.py /usr/lib/python3.2: ... Are there any gotchas in building side-by-side? What build instructions do you use in each case? I install pthon 2 and python 3 side by side. I'm not aware of any conflicts. As you've shown above, python 3 doesn't install /usr/bin/python, if you want it with python 3 you have to make the symlink yourself. As for build instructions they're both: ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared make make install Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Python 3.2.2
Andrew Benton wrote: On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:24:11 -0500 Bruce Dubbs bruce.du...@gmail.com wrote: Are there any gotchas in building side-by-side? What build instructions do you use in each case? I install pthon 2 and python 3 side by side. I'm not aware of any conflicts. As you've shown above, python 3 doesn't install /usr/bin/python, if you want it with python 3 you have to make the symlink yourself. As for build instructions they're both: ./configure --prefix=/usr --enable-shared make make install OK, I'll add python2. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Linux_PAM
The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB upgrade to 5.2.26. I get the following error: .libs/pam_userdb.o: In function `user_lookup': /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:159: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_open' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:192: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_fetch' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:263: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_close' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:263: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_close' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:283: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_firstkey' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:285: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_nextkey' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:169: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_firstkey' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:171: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_fetch' make[3]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:170: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_nextkey' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:310: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_close' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:315: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_close' /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:315: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_close' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [pam_userdb.la] Error 1 make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3' make: *** [all] Error 2 I'll have a look at it a bit closer later on today unless some has some ideas? Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: Linux-PAM and Bekkeley DB
On 30/10/11 09:43, Jeremy Huntwork wrote: On Oct 29, 2011, at 5:52 PM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote: The Linux-PAM build fails for me, most likely due to the Bekkeley DB upgrade to 5.2.26. I get the following error: .libs/pam_userdb.o: In function `user_lookup': /sources/Linux-PAM-1.1.3/modules/pam_userdb/pam_userdb.c:159: undefined reference to `__db_ndbm_open' Try building db with --enable-dbm. JH Thanks, that worked. As mentioned by DJ in the previous post, I think this should be included in the standard build. Regards, Wayne. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
