[blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
I just updated libdrm, but I noticed libpthread-stubs and libatomic_ops are listed as required deps. I have neither of these installed, but libdrm still detects them on my system and builds without problems. Can they be removed as deps? Configure output: checking for PTHREADSTUBS... yes .. checking for CAIRO... yes checking for LIBUDEV... yes checking for native atomic primitives... Intel checking for PCIACCESS... yes checking for VALGRIND... no .. Cairo and valgrind seem to be dependencies too. -Ragnar- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On Saturday 12 May 2012 14:49:47 Bruce Dubbs wrote: What is your host? The dependencies say they are only needed on x86. I'm not sure tha tnote applies to libpthread or not. Core i7: x64 capable, but I didn't install any 64-bit libs. -Ragnar- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On Sat, May 12, 2012 at 10:03:19PM +0200, Ragnar Thomsen wrote: On Saturday 12 May 2012 14:49:47 Bruce Dubbs wrote: What is your host? The dependencies say they are only needed on x86. I'm not sure tha tnote applies to libpthread or not. Core i7: x64 capable, but I didn't install any 64-bit libs. -Ragnar- Just out of interest, do you built glibc for m486, or m686 ? ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On Saturday 12 May 2012 21:30:31 Ken Moffat wrote: Just out of interest, do you built glibc for m486, or m686 ? IIRC, m486 -Ragnar- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On Sat, 12 May 2012 20:40:09 +0100 Ragnar Thomsen rthoms...@gmail.com wrote: I just updated libdrm, but I noticed libpthread-stubs and libatomic_ops are listed as required deps. I have neither of these installed, but libdrm still detects them on my system and builds without problems. Can they be removed as deps? A year or 2 ago libdrm went through a phase where it wouldn't build without either libatomic_ops installed or you could pass a CFLAG to configure (I forget the exact incantation). I think it can use it if it's installed but I believe you're right that it should be listed as an optional dep (haven't tested without it lately). Configure output: checking for PTHREADSTUBS... yes .. checking for CAIRO... yes checking for LIBUDEV... yes checking for native atomic primitives... Intel checking for PCIACCESS... yes checking for VALGRIND... no .. Cairo and valgrind seem to be dependencies too. When I looked at libdrm a few weeks ago configure checked for Cairo but it wasn't mentioned in the rest of the build log. grepping through the libdrm source for mentions of Cairo there was one file in the tests which didn't seem to be used. I don't think Cairo should be listed as a dep if it doesn't use it at all. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On 05/12/2012 09:39 PM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote: I just updated libdrm, but I noticed libpthread-stubs and libatomic_ops are listed as required deps. I have neither of these installed, but libdrm still detects them on my system and builds without problems. Can they be removed as deps? Configure output: checking for PTHREADSTUBS... yes .. checking for CAIRO... yes checking for LIBUDEV... yes checking for native atomic primitives... Intel checking for PCIACCESS... yes checking for VALGRIND... no .. Cairo and valgrind seem to be dependencies too. -Ragnar- http://paste.debian.net/plainh/b4e68a21 This is full build log from my libdrm build. Here are some highlights: checking for PTHREADSTUBS... yes is actually using pkg-config for checking for existence of pthread-stubs.pc file which is provided by libpthread-stubs. It will fail if that one is not installed. But no worries, that one is installed with Xorg. Then: checking for CAIRO... yes it is used only in one test - tests/modetest/modetest.c and that one is being run: Making all in modetest make[3]: Entering directory `/home/armin/src/libdrm-2.4.34/tests/modetest' CC modetest.o CCLD modetest And this one: checking for native atomic primitives... Intel It can use native compiler primitives, in this case Intel - provided by newer compilers (maybe) or fall back to libatomic-ops (checked in configure.ac). Ones that are not listed are: checking for PCIACCESS... yes Is libpciaccess from Xorg Libraries. It is needed for libdrm_intel. Mentioned in intel/intel_bufmgr.c and as you said: checking for VALGRIND... no Optionally used by libdrm_intel to surpress false warnings. Introduced with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=90b23cc24c19fbe131d84237c55311cafeb4ca21 I did not bother to upgrade it, since it introduces major nouveau change which will probably be available in linux 3.4. http://cgit.freedesktop.org/nouveau/linux-2.6/log -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On Sunday 13 May 2012 00:02:00 Armin K. wrote: checking for PTHREADSTUBS... yes is actually using pkg-config for checking for existence of pthread-stubs.pc file which is provided by libpthread-stubs. It will fail if that one is not installed. But no worries, that one is installed with Xorg. Then: checking for CAIRO... yes it is used only in one test - tests/modetest/modetest.c and that one is being run: Making all in modetest make[3]: Entering directory `/home/armin/src/libdrm-2.4.34/tests/modetest' CC modetest.o CCLD modetest And this one: checking for native atomic primitives... Intel It can use native compiler primitives, in this case Intel - provided by newer compilers (maybe) or fall back to libatomic-ops (checked in configure.ac). Ones that are not listed are: checking for PCIACCESS... yes Is libpciaccess from Xorg Libraries. It is needed for libdrm_intel. Mentioned in intel/intel_bufmgr.c and as you said: checking for VALGRIND... no Optionally used by libdrm_intel to surpress false warnings. Introduced with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=90b23cc24c19fbe131d84237c553 11cafeb4ca21 I did not bother to upgrade it, since it introduces major nouveau change which will probably be available in linux 3.4. So I guess libpthreads and Xorg libraries should be required deps, while libatomic-ops, valgrind and cairo are optional. This sound about right? A note could be added that cairo is req for tests. Should we list pkg-config as a req dep as well? -Ragnar- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On 05/13/2012 12:38 AM, Ragnar Thomsen wrote: On Sunday 13 May 2012 00:02:00 Armin K. wrote: checking for PTHREADSTUBS... yes is actually using pkg-config for checking for existence of pthread-stubs.pc file which is provided by libpthread-stubs. It will fail if that one is not installed. But no worries, that one is installed with Xorg. Then: checking for CAIRO... yes it is used only in one test - tests/modetest/modetest.c and that one is being run: Making all in modetest make[3]: Entering directory `/home/armin/src/libdrm-2.4.34/tests/modetest' CC modetest.o CCLD modetest And this one: checking for native atomic primitives... Intel It can use native compiler primitives, in this case Intel - provided by newer compilers (maybe) or fall back to libatomic-ops (checked in configure.ac). Ones that are not listed are: checking for PCIACCESS... yes Is libpciaccess from Xorg Libraries. It is needed for libdrm_intel. Mentioned in intel/intel_bufmgr.c and as you said: checking for VALGRIND... no Optionally used by libdrm_intel to surpress false warnings. Introduced with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/mesa/drm/commit/?id=90b23cc24c19fbe131d84237c553 11cafeb4ca21 I did not bother to upgrade it, since it introduces major nouveau change which will probably be available in linux 3.4. So I guess libpthreads and Xorg libraries should be required deps, while libatomic-ops, valgrind and cairo are optional. This sound about right? A note could be added that cairo is req for tests. Should we list pkg-config as a req dep as well? -Ragnar- xorg libraries should be enough since it will pull pthread stubs via libxcb. As for the pkg-config, it should be set as required at protocol headers page since it is used for detection of util-macros. Also, libXau needs it to find protocol headers and such. libatomic-ops are unnecesary if using new toolchain, and lfs stable has recent enough one so it can be removed from deps list. As for cairo and valgrind, they can be set as optional with additional notes if desired. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
Ragnar Thomsen wrote: So I guess libpthreads and Xorg libraries should be required deps, while libatomic-ops, valgrind and cairo are optional. This sound about right? A note could be added that cairo is req for tests. Should we list pkg-config as a req dep as well? pkg-config is a required dep of makedepend, an ancestor of Xorg libraries, so we don't need to list it explicitly. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] libdrm dependencies
On Sat, 12 May 2012 23:41:22 +0100 Ragnar Thomsen rthoms...@gmail.com wrote: So I guess libpthreads and Xorg libraries should be required deps, while libatomic-ops, valgrind and cairo are optional. This sound about right? A note could be added that cairo is req for tests. Should we list pkg-config as a req dep as well? All the tests run without Cairo. The one test that can use Cairo has other code paths it can use if Cairo is not available. Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
