Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > valgrind 3.9.0 0 * > > Thanks for adding that to the book!!! :-) Yes, that part of the currency needs a little work. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
valgrind3.9.0 0 * Thanks for adding that to the book!!! :-) -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/15/2014 10:50 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Em 14-03-2014 12:53, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> Three new problems, sorry. Think dbus.freedesktop.org reorganized the >> repositories. >> >> Chapter 9 >> dbus-glib0.102 0 * book is good >> Chapter 12 >> dbus 1.8.0 0 * book is good >> Chapter 13 >> dbus-python 1.2.0 0 * book is good > There was a problem with dbus.freedesktop.org server yesterday so I > guess the script ran when it was still present and simply timed out. As > Bruce said, it will say "0" when it can't get the version from website > (timeout, error, whatever). Right. Wait a couple of days to see if problems clear up. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
On 03/15/2014 10:50 AM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 14-03-2014 12:53, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >> Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >>> According to Armin, yesterday, >>> >>> cairomm 1.10.0 1.11.2 * >>> >>> book is good, must be even. >> >> OK, I made cairo even only also even though there are no odd tarballs >> for that. > > > Thanks. > > Three new problems, sorry. Think dbus.freedesktop.org reorganized the > repositories. > > Chapter 9 > dbus-glib 0.102 0 * book is good > > 0.102 still is the greatest number at > http://dbus.freedesktop.org/releases/dbus-glib/ > > I think it was working yesterday. > > Chapter 12 > dbus 1.8.0 0 * book is good > > I think dbus.freedesktop.org has made some modification, both above > worked yesterday. > > Chapter 13 > dbus-python 1.2.0 0 * book is good > > same as above > > > There was a problem with dbus.freedesktop.org server yesterday so I guess the script ran when it was still present and simply timed out. As Bruce said, it will say "0" when it can't get the version from website (timeout, error, whatever). -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Em 14-03-2014 12:53, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > >> According to Armin, yesterday, >> >> cairomm 1.10.0 1.11.2 * >> >> book is good, must be even. > > OK, I made cairo even only also even though there are no odd tarballs > for that. Thanks. Three new problems, sorry. Think dbus.freedesktop.org reorganized the repositories. Chapter 9 dbus-glib 0.102 0 * book is good 0.102 still is the greatest number at http://dbus.freedesktop.org/releases/dbus-glib/ I think it was working yesterday. Chapter 12 dbus1.8.0 0 * book is good I think dbus.freedesktop.org has made some modification, both above worked yesterday. Chapter 13 dbus-python 1.2.0 0 * book is good same as above -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > According to Armin, yesterday, > > cairomm 1.10.0 1.11.2 * > > book is good, must be even. OK, I made cairo even only also even though there are no odd tarballs for that. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 14-03-2014 04:28, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >> Olaf wrote: >>> On 2014-03-12 04:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent released version of the package. >>> >>> I recently stumbled over nano, BLFS has 2.3.2 which is actually a devel >>> release. 2.2.6 is the latest stable. >>> >>> Release scheme seems to be even=stable, odd=devel >>> Version should be retrievable from here http://www.nano-editor.org/ >>> With a release history (for reference) here >>> http://www.nano-editor.org/overview.php >> >> Ok thanks. I was just taking the max value at >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nano/, but I can change that to the last even >> numbered minor version. >> >> Fixed. > > Armin updated to 2.3.1 and I did it to 2.3.2, I think (cannot fine > changelog, though). Should it be reverted to 2.2 series? I don't think that's needed. Just wait till 2.4. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
On 03/14/2014 12:42 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > Em 14-03-2014 04:28, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: >> Olaf wrote: >>> On 2014-03-12 04:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >>> If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent released version of the package. >>> >>> I recently stumbled over nano, BLFS has 2.3.2 which is actually a devel >>> release. 2.2.6 is the latest stable. >>> >>> Release scheme seems to be even=stable, odd=devel >>> Version should be retrievable from here http://www.nano-editor.org/ >>> With a release history (for reference) here >>> http://www.nano-editor.org/overview.php >> >> Ok thanks. I was just taking the max value at >> ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nano/, but I can change that to the last even >> numbered minor version. >> >> Fixed. > > Armin updated to 2.3.1 and I did it to 2.3.2, I think (cannot fine > changelog, though). Should it be reverted to 2.2 series? > > At that time I didn't know that it was development version. But I never saw any problems and it does seem to have more features than the one on archlinux, which is 2.2.x. Last stable release was quite a while ago and I don't think it really hurts having the latest release of the editor. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Em 14-03-2014 03:20, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Armin K. wrote: >> On 03/13/2014 12:09 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > Both fixed. > >-- Bruce > > > Thanks for the fixes. According to Armin, yesterday, cairomm 1.10.0 1.11.2 * book is good, must be even. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Em 14-03-2014 04:28, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Olaf wrote: >> On 2014-03-12 04:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> >>> If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell >>> me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent >>> released version of the package. >> >> I recently stumbled over nano, BLFS has 2.3.2 which is actually a devel >> release. 2.2.6 is the latest stable. >> >> Release scheme seems to be even=stable, odd=devel >> Version should be retrievable from here http://www.nano-editor.org/ >> With a release history (for reference) here >> http://www.nano-editor.org/overview.php > > Ok thanks. I was just taking the max value at > ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nano/, but I can change that to the last even > numbered minor version. > > Fixed. Armin updated to 2.3.1 and I did it to 2.3.2, I think (cannot fine changelog, though). Should it be reverted to 2.2 series? -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Olaf wrote: > On 2014-03-12 04:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > >> If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell >> me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent >> released version of the package. > > I recently stumbled over nano, BLFS has 2.3.2 which is actually a devel > release. 2.2.6 is the latest stable. > > Release scheme seems to be even=stable, odd=devel > Version should be retrievable from here http://www.nano-editor.org/ > With a release history (for reference) here > http://www.nano-editor.org/overview.php Ok thanks. I was just taking the max value at ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/nano/, but I can change that to the last even numbered minor version. Fixed. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
On 2014-03-12 04:30, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell > me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent > released version of the package. I recently stumbled over nano, BLFS has 2.3.2 which is actually a devel release. 2.2.6 is the latest stable. Release scheme seems to be even=stable, odd=devel Version should be retrievable from here http://www.nano-editor.org/ With a release history (for reference) here http://www.nano-editor.org/overview.php Olaf PS: I do realise that nano is not a mission-critical package, but while at it ... PPS: thanks for the work you all put in (B)LFS, much appreciated! -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/13/2014 12:09 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> Chapter 9 >> libsigc++2.3.1 2.2.11 * book is good >> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libsigc++/2.3/libsigc++-2.3.1.tar.xz Fixed. >> Chapter 13 >> cmake2.8.12.23.0.0-rc1 * (think we do not want rc1?) >> http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.12.2.tar.gz Will leave as is waiting for the 3.x stable >> Chapters 14-16 >> wireshark1.10.6 1.11.2 * (minor not odd) >> https://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/wireshark-1.10.6.tar.bz2 Fixed >> Chapters 20-23 >> mariadb 10.0.8 5.5.36 * (you already know, just recalling) Will leave as is. >> virtuoso 6.1.8 7.1.0 * >> Modificado 26 horas atrás por rt >> We may want to stay with Virtuoso 6, as it seems Virtuoso 7 requires 64-bit. Will leave as is. >> Chapter 24 >> xf86-input-wacom 0.23.0 0.22.1 * book is good >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxwacom/files/xf86-input-wacom/ Fixed. >> Chapter 30 >> libpeas 1.9.0 1.8.1 * book is good >> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libpeas/1.9/libpeas-1.9.0.tar.xz Fixed, but why does every other package in this section with a prefix of ftp://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources//x.yy use stable for only even yy values? If this is a temporary exception that we chose, then we should put it back to the way it was. >> Chapters 32-33 >> midori 0.5.7 1.1 * book is good (at least, could not find 1.1) >> http://www.midori-browser.org/downloads/midori_0.5.7_all_.tar.bz2 Fixed. >> Chapter 39 >> libass 0.11.1 0.10.2 * book is good >> https://github.com/libass/libass/releases/download/0.11.1/libass-0.11.1.tar.xz They changed their website on me. Fixed. >> soundtouch 1.8.0 1.7.1 * book is good >> http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/soundtouch-1.8.0.tar.gz Fixed. The actual url needed to extract the latest version is http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/sourcecode.html It gets difficult when they don't let me get a directory listing where the source code is located. > Add kde-workspace and phonon to this list. Both show same version as KDE > but neither of these uses their versioning scheme. Both fixed. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Armin K. wrote: > Add kde-workspace and phonon to this list. Both show same version as KDE > but neither of these uses their versioning scheme. Looking at the code phonon should be right but kde-workspace is not. I'll fix both. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
On 03/13/2014 12:09 PM, Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > Chapter 9 > libsigc++ 2.3.1 2.2.11 * book is good > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libsigc++/2.3/libsigc++-2.3.1.tar.xz > > > Chapter 13 > cmake 2.8.12.23.0.0-rc1 * (think we do not want rc1?) > http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.12.2.tar.gz > > > Chapters 14-16 > wireshark 1.10.6 1.11.2 * (minor not odd) > https://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/wireshark-1.10.6.tar.bz2 > > > Chapters 20-23 > mariadb 10.0.8 5.5.36 * (you already know, just recalling) > > virtuoso 6.1.8 7.1.0 * > Modificado 26 horas atrás por rt > We may want to stay with Virtuoso 6, as it seems Virtuoso 7 requires 64-bit. > > > Chapter 24 > xf86-input-wacom 0.23.0 0.22.1 * book is good > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxwacom/files/xf86-input-wacom/ > > > Chapter 30 > libpeas 1.9.0 1.8.1 * book is good > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libpeas/1.9/libpeas-1.9.0.tar.xz > > > Chapters 32-33 > midori0.5.7 1.1 * book is good (at least, could not find 1.1) > http://www.midori-browser.org/downloads/midori_0.5.7_all_.tar.bz2 > > > Chapter 39 > libass0.11.1 0.10.2 * book is good > https://github.com/libass/libass/releases/download/0.11.1/libass-0.11.1.tar.xz > > soundtouch1.8.0 1.7.1 * book is good > http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/soundtouch-1.8.0.tar.gz > > Thanks for the effort making this script! > > I don't know if I am right in all the points above. > > Add kde-workspace and phonon to this list. Both show same version as KDE but neither of these uses their versioning scheme. -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >>> Chapters 32-33 >>> midori 0.5.7 1.1 * book is good (at least, could not find 1.1) >>> http://www.midori-browser.org/downloads/midori_0.5.7_all_.tar.bz2 >> >> Let em get back to you on that. > > This one, in the page > > http://www.midori-browser.org/download/source/ > > has: > > tar.bz2 · 0.5.7 · 1.1 MB > > It seems the script is picking the size, not the version. Probably upstream was making a clever change to their website. Fixed for now. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Em 13-03-2014 13:05, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Thanks Fernando. Comments below. The issue is how to decide on what is > current for scripting purposes. Some cases use even for development and > odd for stable (or maybe the opposite). > >-- Bruce > > > Fernando de Oliveira wrote: >> >> Chapter 9 >> libsigc++2.3.1 2.2.11 * book is good >> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libsigc++/2.3/libsigc++-2.3.1.tar.xz > > Even only? I think this does not follow odd/even > >> Chapter 13 >> cmake2.8.12.23.0.0-rc1 * (think we do not want rc1?) >> http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.12.2.tar.gz > > I left it that way because it is too complicated otherwise. I first > have to determine highest directory, e.g, v3.0. Then look in that > directory for max version. In this case only rc values. I'd have to > back up to next highest directory and again find teh highest value. Too > much work for this one package. When 3.0 is released, it will reflect > that correctly. For now, we just leave it as a difference. OK > >> Chapters 14-16 >> wireshark1.10.6 1.11.2 * (minor not odd) >> https://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/wireshark-1.10.6.tar.bz2 > > Will update. > >> Chapters 20-23 >> mariadb 10.0.8 5.5.36 * (you already know, just recalling) >> >> virtuoso 6.1.8 7.1.0 * >> Modificado 26 horas atrás por rt Sorry, only now, saw it was not in English: "Modified 26 hours ago by rt" >> We may want to stay with Virtuoso 6, as it seems Virtuoso 7 requires 64-bit. > > We need to decide. I still need 32bit. Have only one LFS 7.3 64bit just for OJDK binary. > >> Chapter 24 >> xf86-input-wacom 0.23.0 0.22.1 * book is good >> http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxwacom/files/xf86-input-wacom/ > > Wow do we know in the future. Igor does. :-) > >> Chapter 30 >> libpeas 1.9.0 1.8.1 * book is good >> http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libpeas/1.9/libpeas-1.9.0.tar.xz > > Even/odd? I think this does not follow odd/even > >> Chapters 32-33 >> midori 0.5.7 1.1 * book is good (at least, could not find 1.1) >> http://www.midori-browser.org/downloads/midori_0.5.7_all_.tar.bz2 > > Let em get back to you on that. This one, in the page http://www.midori-browser.org/download/source/ has: tar.bz2 · 0.5.7 · 1.1 MB It seems the script is picking the size, not the version. > >> Chapter 39 >> libass 0.11.1 0.10.2 * book is good >> https://github.com/libass/libass/releases/download/0.11.1/libass-0.11.1.tar.xz > > Even/odd? I think this does not follow odd/even > >> soundtouch 1.8.0 1.7.1 * book is good >> http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/soundtouch-1.8.0.tar.gz > > Even/odd? I think this does not follow odd/even Again, not completely sure about the comments. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Thanks Fernando. Comments below. The issue is how to decide on what is current for scripting purposes. Some cases use even for development and odd for stable (or maybe the opposite). -- Bruce Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > > Chapter 9 > libsigc++ 2.3.1 2.2.11 * book is good > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libsigc++/2.3/libsigc++-2.3.1.tar.xz Even only? > Chapter 13 > cmake 2.8.12.23.0.0-rc1 * (think we do not want rc1?) > http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.12.2.tar.gz I left it that way because it is too complicated otherwise. I first have to determine highest directory, e.g, v3.0. Then look in that directory for max version. In this case only rc values. I'd have to back up to next highest directory and again find teh highest value. Too much work for this one package. When 3.0 is released, it will reflect that correctly. For now, we just leave it as a difference. > Chapters 14-16 > wireshark 1.10.6 1.11.2 * (minor not odd) > https://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/wireshark-1.10.6.tar.bz2 Will update. > Chapters 20-23 > mariadb 10.0.8 5.5.36 * (you already know, just recalling) > > virtuoso 6.1.8 7.1.0 * > Modificado 26 horas atrás por rt > We may want to stay with Virtuoso 6, as it seems Virtuoso 7 requires 64-bit. We need to decide. > Chapter 24 > xf86-input-wacom 0.23.0 0.22.1 * book is good > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxwacom/files/xf86-input-wacom/ Wow do we know in the future. > Chapter 30 > libpeas 1.9.0 1.8.1 * book is good > http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libpeas/1.9/libpeas-1.9.0.tar.xz Even/odd? > Chapters 32-33 > midori0.5.7 1.1 * book is good (at least, could not find 1.1) > http://www.midori-browser.org/downloads/midori_0.5.7_all_.tar.bz2 Let em get back to you on that. > Chapter 39 > libass0.11.1 0.10.2 * book is good > https://github.com/libass/libass/releases/download/0.11.1/libass-0.11.1.tar.xz Even/odd? > soundtouch1.8.0 1.7.1 * book is good > http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/soundtouch-1.8.0.tar.gz Even/odd? -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Em 13-03-2014 08:09, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu: > Thanks for the effort making this script! It is very good, your script and I know needs a lot of effort and time to produce it. > I don't know if I am right in all the points above. > > -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Chapter 9 libsigc++ 2.3.1 2.2.11 * book is good http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libsigc++/2.3/libsigc++-2.3.1.tar.xz Chapter 13 cmake 2.8.12.23.0.0-rc1 * (think we do not want rc1?) http://www.cmake.org/files/v2.8/cmake-2.8.12.2.tar.gz Chapters 14-16 wireshark 1.10.6 1.11.2 * (minor not odd) https://www.wireshark.org/download/src/all-versions/wireshark-1.10.6.tar.bz2 Chapters 20-23 mariadb 10.0.8 5.5.36 * (you already know, just recalling) virtuoso6.1.8 7.1.0 * Modificado 26 horas atrás por rt We may want to stay with Virtuoso 6, as it seems Virtuoso 7 requires 64-bit. Chapter 24 xf86-input-wacom0.23.0 0.22.1 * book is good http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxwacom/files/xf86-input-wacom/ Chapter 30 libpeas 1.9.0 1.8.1 * book is good http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/gnome/sources/libpeas/1.9/libpeas-1.9.0.tar.xz Chapters 32-33 midori 0.5.7 1.1 * book is good (at least, could not find 1.1) http://www.midori-browser.org/downloads/midori_0.5.7_all_.tar.bz2 Chapter 39 libass 0.11.1 0.10.2 * book is good https://github.com/libass/libass/releases/download/0.11.1/libass-0.11.1.tar.xz soundtouch 1.8.0 1.7.1 * book is good http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/soundtouch-1.8.0.tar.gz Thanks for the effort making this script! I don't know if I am right in all the points above. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 10:30:13PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > > The naming of files is also quite inconsistent. For example, we have > junit4_4.11.orig.tar.gz. First why do they need to tell us it's version > 4 twice. Second, why do they need to add 'orig'. What else would it > be? Binary? If so, then for what architecture? Actually junit is java > and you don't have binaries. > Standard debian (and its derivatives, in this case ubuntu) - they probably have a policy for it, along with the underscore in the name. Remember that debian has some very old versions of certain packages, and that different packages may depend on either the old or the new versions. So in this case, it's like libcap which they named as libcap2 when we were using them for the source. The 4.11 tells us the actual version. The '.orig' confirms it is upstream (sometimes there is an abbreviation dfsg (debian free software guidelines) which I _believe_ indicates that certain parts of the source have been removed for licencing issues. Depending on the age of the package, sometimes there is also a '.debian.tar.gz' which contains the debian files for modifying their build system, as well as patches, changelog, list of files installed, etc. Their binaries are normally packaged as _*.deb files, with an indication of the architecture such as amd64, armel, armhf, i386, ia64, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, sparc and perhaps some other linux arches, as well as the non-linux. in the case of java the binary is _all.deb : for debian itself, junit is still at 3.8.2. ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Fernando de Oliveira wrote: > I just looked at Programming, because was trying to find what you did > with OJDK (sorry, only today I have seen your query). Then, I saw: > > python2 2.7.6 0 * > python2 docs 2.7.6 2.7.6 > > I believe the address is http://legacy.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.6/ The way I get python is to use the url in the book. http://www.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.6/Python-2.7.6.tar.xz For python2, I back up to the parent: http://www.python.org/ftp/python and get the max number that starts with a 2 (or 3 or python3). That should still be valid. My script uses 'curl -3 -L -s -m30 $url' to get the page, but for some reason, pages on some sites are not always fetched properly. As you can see in this instance, the python page was fetched properly for python3, but not python2. The next time the script is run, it will probably be OK. Note that on the same page, mercurial had the same problem. That site has a more frequent problem. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Em 12-03-2014 00:30, Bruce Dubbs escreveu: > Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at >> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html >> >> Most of the scripts are working, but I still need to address a few >> issues that have changed since I first wrote them last Fall. >> >> In any case the info there seems to be mostly correct. I'll finish up >> the outstanding issues in the next day or so. >> >> There are a fair number of packages out of date that are not in the >> ticket system. If someone want to go through and add new tickets for >> the out of date packages, please do so. > > It took me all day to wrestle these scripts into shape. The main > problem is upstream devs who think it's clever to hide their directory > listings of the packages they offer. They spend time making clever html > files that are automatically generated but that just makes it quite > difficult to extract just what is the latest release. > > The naming of files is also quite inconsistent. For example, we have > junit4_4.11.orig.tar.gz. First why do they need to tell us it's version > 4 twice. Second, why do they need to add 'orig'. What else would it > be? Binary? If so, then for what architecture? Actually junit is java > and you don't have binaries. > > In any case the scripts are current. If the 'Latest' version is a 0, > then it means that either the upstream server is down or someone was > clever and changed a file name or web page. > > There was at least one server down today: 0pointer.de. We have several > packages pointing there. I've noticed it being down in the past. It > doesn't seem to be very reliable. > > If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell > me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent > released version of the package. Thanks for it. I just looked at Programming, because was trying to find what you did with OJDK (sorry, only today I have seen your query). Then, I saw: python2 2.7.6 0 * python2 docs2.7.6 2.7.6 I believe the address is http://legacy.python.org/ftp/python/2.7.6/ -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at > http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html > > Most of the scripts are working, but I still need to address a few > issues that have changed since I first wrote them last Fall. > > In any case the info there seems to be mostly correct. I'll finish up > the outstanding issues in the next day or so. > > There are a fair number of packages out of date that are not in the > ticket system. If someone want to go through and add new tickets for > the out of date packages, please do so. It took me all day to wrestle these scripts into shape. The main problem is upstream devs who think it's clever to hide their directory listings of the packages they offer. They spend time making clever html files that are automatically generated but that just makes it quite difficult to extract just what is the latest release. The naming of files is also quite inconsistent. For example, we have junit4_4.11.orig.tar.gz. First why do they need to tell us it's version 4 twice. Second, why do they need to add 'orig'. What else would it be? Binary? If so, then for what architecture? Actually junit is java and you don't have binaries. In any case the scripts are current. If the 'Latest' version is a 0, then it means that either the upstream server is down or someone was clever and changed a file name or web page. There was at least one server down today: 0pointer.de. We have several packages pointing there. I've noticed it being down in the past. It doesn't seem to be very reliable. If you notice something wrong, please let me know, but please also tell me what the correct URL is that I can use to determine the most recent released version of the package. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Armin K. wrote: > On 03/11/2014 06:29 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at >> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html >> >> Most of the scripts are working, but I still need to address a few >> issues that have changed since I first wrote them last Fall. >> >> In any case the info there seems to be mostly correct. I'll finish up >> the outstanding issues in the next day or so. >> >> There are a fair number of packages out of date that are not in the >> ticket system. If someone want to go through and add new tickets for >> the out of date packages, please do so. > Few naming issues: > > icu 4c-52_1 -> icu4c 52_1 > libxml 2-2.9.1 -> libxml2 2.9.1 > graphite 2-1.2.4 -> graphite2 1.2.4 > raptor 2-2.0.13 -> raptor2 2.0.13 > imlib 2-1.4.6 -> imlib2 1.4.6 OK, I can fix that up. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
akhiezer wrote: >> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:29:00 -0500 >> From: Bruce Dubbs >> To: BLFS Development List >> Subject: [blfs-dev] Package Currency >> >> Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at >> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html > Is there an all-on-one-page version of that info - html nochunks with > anchor links? And even better, a (more-readily-) machine-parseable txt > version? The scripts total about 10K lines. There's a lot of similarity in the 23 different scripts, but also a lot of customization in each one. Creating a nochunks version may be difficult, but I could create a single machine-parseable file. It would create a need to modify all 23 scripts, but may be doable with an include. I suppose a 24th script to create a nochunks html version from a machine-parseable version would not be that difficult. > Also, the linked-to filenames (e.g. 'chapter32.html') seem to get a bit > out-of-sync with the linked-from text (e.g. 'Chapters 33-34 - Xfce Desktop > and Applications'), from ca xfce onwards. There were changes after I created the scripts, including chapter changes. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
Em 11-03-2014 10:22, Armin K. escreveu: > On 03/11/2014 06:29 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: >> Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at >> http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html >> >> Most of the scripts are working, but I still need to address a few >> issues that have changed since I first wrote them last Fall. >> >> In any case the info there seems to be mostly correct. I'll finish up >> the outstanding issues in the next day or so. >> >> There are a fair number of packages out of date that are not in the >> ticket system. If someone want to go through and add new tickets for >> the out of date packages, please do so. >> >>-- Bruce >> > > Few naming issues: > > icu 4c-52_1 -> icu4c 52_1 > libxml 2-2.9.1 -> libxml2 2.9.1 > graphite 2-1.2.4 -> graphite2 1.2.4 > raptor 2-2.0.13 -> raptor2 2.0.13 > imlib 2-1.4.6 -> imlib2 1.4.6 > Thanks, Armin and Bruce, Please, Armin, Create tickets as you discover and check if any I did today is development. -- []s, Fernando -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
On 03/11/2014 06:29 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at > http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html > > Most of the scripts are working, but I still need to address a few > issues that have changed since I first wrote them last Fall. > > In any case the info there seems to be mostly correct. I'll finish up > the outstanding issues in the next day or so. > > There are a fair number of packages out of date that are not in the > ticket system. If someone want to go through and add new tickets for > the out of date packages, please do so. > >-- Bruce > Few naming issues: icu 4c-52_1 -> icu4c 52_1 libxml 2-2.9.1 -> libxml2 2.9.1 graphite 2-1.2.4 -> graphite2 1.2.4 raptor 2-2.0.13 -> raptor2 2.0.13 imlib 2-1.4.6 -> imlib2 1.4.6 -- Note: My last name is not Krejzi. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: [blfs-dev] Package Currency
> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 00:29:00 -0500 > From: Bruce Dubbs > To: BLFS Development List > Subject: [blfs-dev] Package Currency > > Today I've been working on the package currency scripts at > http://anduin.linuxfromscratch.org/~bdubbs/blfs-currency.html > Is there an all-on-one-page version of that info - html nochunks with anchor links? And even better, a (more-readily-) machine-parseable txt version? Also, the linked-to filenames (e.g. 'chapter32.html') seem to get a bit out-of-sync with the linked-from text (e.g. 'Chapters 33-34 - Xfce Desktop and Applications'), from ca xfce onwards. rgds, akh -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
