Re: PSUtils-p17
On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:05:54PM -0500, David Jensen wrote: > > Randy doesn't see it as improved and I agree except for sed delimiter: > I propose this change. > cat Makefile.unix | sed -e 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Makefile && If you are going to change it anyway, then there is no reason to keep the cat in there. If the server was up, I'd point you to the "Useless use of cat Awards". :) -- Archaic Want control, education, and security from your operating system? Hardened Linux From Scratch http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/hlfs -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: PSUtils-p17
Archaic wrote: On Sun, Jun 12, 2005 at 07:05:54PM -0500, David Jensen wrote: Randy doesn't see it as improved and I agree except for sed delimiter: I propose this change. cat Makefile.unix | sed -e 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Makefile && If you are going to change it anyway, then there is no reason to keep the cat in there. If the server was up, I'd point you to the "Useless use of cat Awards". :) Well, Hey. this works: sed -e 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Makefile.unix > Makefile do you have a shorter, better? -- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: PSUtils-p17
David Jensen wrote: > Well, Hey. this works: > sed -e 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Makefile.unix > Makefile > do you have a shorter, better? I'm in the process of updating ispell right now and that is the structure I am using. I personally like colons instead of at signs, but showing the users different options is good too. -- Bruce -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: PSUtils-p17
Bruce Dubbs wrote: I'm in the process of updating ispell right now and that is the structure I am using. I personally like colons instead of at signs, but showing the users different options is good too. I'm going to commit it. It is simpler now thanks to Archaic's clue bat. -- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: PSUtils-p17
Bruce Dubbs wrote: David Jensen wrote: Well, Hey. this works: sed -e 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Makefile.unix > Makefile do you have a shorter, better? I'm in the process of updating ispell right now and that is the structure I am using. I personally like colons instead of at signs, but showing the users different options is good too. sed -e 'sh/usr/localh/usrhg' hehe :D -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: PSUtils-p17
David Jensen wrote: Well, Hey. this works: sed -e 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Makefile.unix > Makefile do you have a shorter, better? BTW, perhaps I need a cluebat thrown here, but is the '-e' even necessary in this case? Is there something wrong with: sed 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Makefile.unix > Makefile -- JH -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Re: PSUtils-p17
Jeremy Huntwork wrote: David Jensen wrote: Well, Hey. this works: sed -e 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Makefile.unix > Makefile do you have a shorter, better? BTW, perhaps I need a cluebat thrown here, but is the '-e' even necessary in this case? Is there something wrong with: sed 's@/usr/local@/[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Makefile.unix > Makefile -- JH You are right. Works good! :-) I'll fix it later. -- David Jensen -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page
