>> Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 09:58:02 -0300
>> From: Fernando de Oliveira
>> To: BLFS Support List
>> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Iced Tea 2.4.1 and iced tea 2.4.5 sed
>> unknown
>> option to `s'
>>
>> Em 15-02-2014 08:29, akhiezer escreveu:
>> >> From blfs-support-boun...@linuxfromscratch.org Fri Feb 14 13:19:25
>> 2014
>> >> Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:13:47 -0300
>> >> From: Fernando de Oliveira
>> >> To: BLFS Support List
>> >> Subject: Re: [blfs-support] Iced Tea 2.4.1 and iced tea 2.4.5 sed
>> unknown
>> >> option to `s'
>> >>
>> >.
>> >.
>> >>
>> >> I am trying to understand this better, and have found that configure
>> and
>> >> configure.ac have mentions to lsb_release. I am trying to understand
>> if
>> >> it is a required, recommended or optional dependency. However, in one
>> >> machine I do not have it installed and it gives me linux-gnu and
>> builds
>> >> fine, so, I am intending to add as optional.
>> >>
>> >> What do you all think about this? I cannot understand why
>> Christopher's
>> >> is getting n/a.
>> >>
>> >> In the following, I am writing some observations and guesses.
>> >>
>> >> In configure, for 2.4.4, which is a build dir still in place in yet
>> >> another machine, I see:
>> >>
>> >> {{{
>> >> if test -n "$ac_tool_prefix"; then
>> >> # Extract the first word of "${ac_tool_prefix}lsb_release", so it
>> can
>> >> be a program name with args.
>> >> set dummy ${ac_tool_prefix}lsb_release; ac_word=$2
>> >> { $as_echo "$as_me:${as_lineno-$LINENO}: checking for $ac_word" >&5
>> >> $as_echo_n "checking for $ac_word... " >&6; }
>> >> if ${ac_cv_path_LSB_RELEASE+:} false; then :
>> >> $as_echo_n "(cached) " >&6
>> >> else
>> >> case $LSB_RELEASE in
>> >> [\\/]* | ?:[\\/]*)
>> >> ac_cv_path_LSB_RELEASE="$LSB_RELEASE" # Let the user override the
>> test
>> >> with a path.
>> >> ;;
>> >> *)
>> >> as_save_IFS=$IFS; IFS=$PATH_SEPARATOR
>> >> }}}
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Also, I noticed that he is building at /opt, so probably as root. I
>> have:
>> >>
>> >> {{{
>> >> $ xzgrep -C6 distro_name
>> >> /home/fernando/Downloads/blfs/OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-2.4.5-2014.01.29-18h12m38s.log.xz
>> >> rm -f
>> >> /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java
>> >> rm -f
>> >> /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java.temp
>> >> /bin/sed -e 's/@@launcher_name@@/java/g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@java_version@@/1.7.0_51-blfs/g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@java_runtime_version@@/1.7.0_51-blfs-b31/g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@jdk_derivative_name@@/IcedTea 2.4.5/g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@distro_name@@/Linux From Scratch/g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@distro_package_version@@/'7u51-2.4.5-blfs'/g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@java_runtime_name@@/OpenJDK Runtime Environment/g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@jdk_revid@@//g' \
>> >> -e 's/@@hotspot_revid@@//g' \
>> >> ../../../src/share/classes/sun/misc/Version.java.template >
>> >> /home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/generated.build/sun/misc/Version.java.temp
>> >> make[5]: Leaving directory
>> >> `/home/fernando/tmp/paco-build-2014.01.29-18h12m38s/icedtea-2.4.5/openjdk-boot/jdk/make/java/version'
>> >> }}}
>> >>
>> >> I remember having sometime ago problems with PATH, for some packages,
>> if
>> >> I build as root, and for those, I have a line in the script:
>> >>
>> >> source /etc/profile
>> >>
>> >> and the PATH is well defined, because he needs:
>> >>
>> >> export CLASSPATH=.:/usr/share/java &&
>> >> export PATH="$PATH:/opt/OpenJDK-1.7.0.51-bin/bin"
>> >>
>> >> or similar, if the binary is another one, i.e., the binary has to be
>> in
>> >> the path, and, in my case, it is provided by:
>> >>
>> >> /etc/profile.d/openjdk.sh
>> >>
>> >> which is defined in OJDK/Icedtea BLFS page.
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > Yes, tracing through the code indicates that the problem may be
>> > stemming from 'lsb_release -is' outputting 'n/a' (others on web have
>> > reported various breakages - not just re icedtea - that seem to stem
>> > from lsb_release using 'n/a' as a return value - and the code that
>> uses
>> > said output not sanitising its own input).
>> >
>> >
>> > The following is working from blfs-svn
>> ('OpenJDK-1.7.0.51/IcedTea-2.4.5'
>> > ,
>> 'http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/openjdk.html'),
>> > but should be similar for blfs-7.4 (I've broken/re-wrapped some of the
>> > longer outputted lines):
>> >
>> > (0) # Unpack src tarballs into . for the purposes of following greps.
>> NB
>> > that this is not making any suggestion on how you should unpack
>> > stuff for the build: follow the book for that, of course.
>> >
>> > (1) grep -r '@@distro_name@@' .
>> > ./jdk-9db88c18e114/make/java/version/Makefile:
>> > -e 's/@@distro_name@@/$(DISTRO_NAME)/g' \
>> >
>> > (2) grep -r 'DISTRO_NAME' .
>> > ./icedtea-2.4.5/Makefile.am:
>> > echo "DISTRO_NAME=$(DIST_NAME)"
>> >>openjdk/jdk/make/common/shared/Defs.gmk ;
>> > ./icedtea-2.4
