Is it possible to disable this feature via the registry?  We're a digital 
signage company, and many of our clients use HTML apps which are stored in 
the filesystem and loaded via an iFrame as pointed out by Eric.

We are using Chrome Enterprise.

Many thanks



On Thursday, 18 August 2022 at 18:27:09 UTC+1 Eric Melgaard wrote:

> This was heavily used in an enterprise product to play HTML content via 
> iframes in a signage application.
>
> Depreciation or preventing 3rd party access would have been appreciated 
> since persistent storage owned by the application, should be accessible to 
> the application. 
>
> On Friday, June 3, 2022 at 9:54:16 AM UTC-5 rby...@chromium.org wrote:
>
>> I checked the WebView-specific UseCounter too and it's half that of the 
>> Android one. So yeah, it seems extremely unlikely to me that anyone will 
>> notice this - more like a bug-fix than a deprecation. LGTM3
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2022 at 3:23 AM Yoav Weiss <yoav...@chromium.org> wrote:
>>
>>> LGTM2
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 2, 2022 at 8:20 PM Daniel Bratell <brat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well below our customary threshold level, and unlikely to be used in 
>>>> our blind spots (WebView, enterprise). I think it's safe to remove 
>>>> directly.
>>>>
>>>> LGTM1
>>>>
>>>> /Daniel
>>>> On 2022-06-02 19:40, Mike Taylor wrote:
>>>>
>>>> *Contact emails* 
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> * mike...@chromium.org, m...@chromium.org Summary We propose to remove 
>>>> support for navigating to filesystem:// URLs in iframes. Blink component 
>>>> Blink>Storage>FileSystem 
>>>> <https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/list?q=component:Blink%3EStorage%3EFileSystem>
>>>>  
>>>> Motivation Render-initiated navigations to filesystem:// URLs are blocked 
>>>> in top-level frames, but are currently allowed in iframes. As part of the 
>>>> storage partitioning efforts, we propose to remove support for navigation 
>>>> to filesystem:// URLs in iframes. Preventing navigation in third-party 
>>>> contexts would be sufficient for our privacy goals, but as usage is almost 
>>>> non-existent, we believe removing support for navigation in iframes 
>>>> altogether is the better approach. 
>>>> (https://miketaylr.com/misc/filesystem-navigation.html 
>>>> <https://miketaylr.com/misc/filesystem-navigation.html> may be useful to 
>>>> grok what any of this means.) TAG review N/A. This intent refers to a 
>>>> Chromium-only feature (which we’re trying to remove). Risks 
>>>> Interoperability and Compatibility No other engine supports filesystem:// 
>>>> URLs, so we do not expect interoperability issues. As for compatibility, 
>>>> usage is very, very low. Currently just above 0.0000008% 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/4077>. For 
>>>> this reason we would like to just remove it, without any deprecation 
>>>> period. Gecko: N/A (not supported) WebKit: N/A (not supported) Web 
>>>> developers: No signals Other signals: WebView application risks Does this 
>>>> intent deprecate or change behavior of existing APIs, such that it has 
>>>> potentially high risk for Android WebView-based applications? No. 
>>>> Debuggability We currently send an error message to the console if you try 
>>>> to open a window to a filesystem:// URL - we will do something similar for 
>>>> iframes. Is this feature fully tested by web-platform-tests 
>>>> <https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromium/src/+/main/docs/testing/web_platform_tests.md>?
>>>>  
>>>> No Flag name FileSystemUrlNavigation Requires code in //chrome? False 
>>>> Estimated milestones M105 Link to entry on the Chrome Platform Status 
>>>> https://chromestatus.com/feature/5816343679991808 
>>>> <https://chromestatus.com/feature/5816343679991808> This intent message 
>>>> was 
>>>> generated by Chrome Platform Status <https://chromestatus.com/>. *
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/84b7af7f-66fb-4874-0290-f0b22f51cb52%40chromium.org
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/84b7af7f-66fb-4874-0290-f0b22f51cb52%40chromium.org?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b9ca44ab-0655-8e86-a714-aad7ea463b25%40gmail.com
>>>>  
>>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/b9ca44ab-0655-8e86-a714-aad7ea463b25%40gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>> -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
>>> Groups "blink-dev" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
>>> an email to blink-dev+...@chromium.org.
>>>
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>>> https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfW5x6mzXJXAngGT1m82jEr3hTM_WPShKi4tnJLvGXgWKQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>>  
>>> <https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/CAL5BFfW5x6mzXJXAngGT1m82jEr3hTM_WPShKi4tnJLvGXgWKQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/d/msgid/blink-dev/58af1e13-08e8-472f-8471-2ffeda35e8b5n%40chromium.org.

Reply via email to