Re: emacspeak finally running
Another tip that was posted to this list a while ago, that I'll try next time I update Emacspeak, unless I switch to the method Tim recommends, is the following: Try running touch servers/linux-outloud/atcleci.so from the root of the emacspeak source tree. make will be fooled into installing a dummy atcleci.so. That's fine, since you don't have outloud on that machine. Chris posted this. On 02/03/17 18:01, Jude DaShiell wrote: Thanks Christopher, I'll find that and adjust and can probably have emacspeak living under builds without so much major surgery that way. On Thu, 2 Mar 2017, Christopher Chaltain wrote: Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2017 18:45:57 From: Christopher Chaltain <chalt...@gmail.com> Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> Subject: Re: emacspeak finally running To get around the Makefile trying to compile the server for Outloud, I just commented out the following line in the Makefile: # $(INSTALL) -m 755 ${OUTLOUD} $(libdir)/servers/linux-outloud On 02/03/17 15:25, Jude DaShiell wrote: What a mess! I had to do a whole lot of things way outside documentation to get this application running. First, since outloud kept on insisting on compiling I did major surgery on the emacspeak/servers directory and erased anything that wasn't linux-espeak. I think emacspeak was getting confused in that directory. After make config and make emacspeak and copying the directory and all subdirectories that had emacspeak-setup.el to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp and adding an (add-list "load-path statement above emacspeak-setup.el line as suggested in the info page, I had to start emacs which complained it couldn't find emacspeak-setup.el after being loaded and then I did a load-library emacspeak-setup.el and heard emacspeak finally do something close to its normal startup including the organ music. Now I'm going to have to investigate to find out why the /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/lisp/lisp/ path wasn't liked by emacs. I think the Make file in the emacspeak directory inadvertently had its exit statements stripped out if exit is even a valid Makefile command because the stanza just below emacspeak: was you guessed it outloud:. My reading of Makefile code isn't all that professional but all I found was a blank line between the end of the emacspeak stanza and the outloud: stanza and unless that's a valid form of exit it's entirely understandable why outloud kept building even though viavoice wasn't on the machine at the time. Let's not even talk about searching for existing server software before building anything, that will add too much complexity to the Makefile most likely. Now I'm going to go study Makefile syntax and see if I can learn enough to figure out some valid fixes for this one. -- ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: emacspeak finally running
To get around the Makefile trying to compile the server for Outloud, I just commented out the following line in the Makefile: # $(INSTALL) -m 755 ${OUTLOUD} $(libdir)/servers/linux-outloud On 02/03/17 15:25, Jude DaShiell wrote: What a mess! I had to do a whole lot of things way outside documentation to get this application running. First, since outloud kept on insisting on compiling I did major surgery on the emacspeak/servers directory and erased anything that wasn't linux-espeak. I think emacspeak was getting confused in that directory. After make config and make emacspeak and copying the directory and all subdirectories that had emacspeak-setup.el to /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp and adding an (add-list "load-path statement above emacspeak-setup.el line as suggested in the info page, I had to start emacs which complained it couldn't find emacspeak-setup.el after being loaded and then I did a load-library emacspeak-setup.el and heard emacspeak finally do something close to its normal startup including the organ music. Now I'm going to have to investigate to find out why the /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp/lisp/lisp/ path wasn't liked by emacs. I think the Make file in the emacspeak directory inadvertently had its exit statements stripped out if exit is even a valid Makefile command because the stanza just below emacspeak: was you guessed it outloud:. My reading of Makefile code isn't all that professional but all I found was a blank line between the end of the emacspeak stanza and the outloud: stanza and unless that's a valid form of exit it's entirely understandable why outloud kept building even though viavoice wasn't on the machine at the time. Let's not even talk about searching for existing server software before building anything, that will add too much complexity to the Makefile most likely. Now I'm going to go study Makefile syntax and see if I can learn enough to figure out some valid fixes for this one. -- ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: Orca & tbird issues
Thunderbird has control+r for reply to sender, control+shift+r for reply to all and control+shift+l for reply to list. On 10/11/16 08:36, Janina Sajka wrote: I just don't see any good reason for running a client like mutt in a gui terminal with Orca. Yes, from the "let's get everything working like it should" perspective, we need good performance and good behavior in gui terminals, but mutt just runs so well in a console terminal (think screen) with Speakup, that I just don't worry my poor little head over the gui terminal. It's rather interesting, though, that similar issues can sometimes crop up in the console environment. I've recently been running Fedora 25 pre-release mutt v. 1.7.1 as my client, and I occasionally run into focus problems, meaning that what Speakup's Keypad 8 will say is one off from the actual selection. Usually the screen Ctrl+l "redraw the screen" command fixes that. Until the last mutt update there was a more annoying issue for me where Home and End didn't work to take you to the top or bottom of the index list. It was a bug, and I'm so glad it's now squashed. As for replying to the wrong person, that just happens if one isn't careful to observe the header data before sending. You don't need to be blind and using a screen reader to exhibit that behavior. I see the very same thing every so often from the very smart teckies on my various W3C lists, most of who are perfectly able bodied. Mutt does have one command I absolutely love, and I wonder whether the gui clients have something similar. There's the usual 'r' for reply to the sender, and 'g' for reply to all, but I particularly appreciate Shift+L for "reply only to the lists, and not the individuals." I must confess, though, that I'm impressed that people have found a browser interface to email fully usable. To me this suggests that familiarity with the particular environment is still the most important factor for success with whatever one chooses to use. Janina Tim Chase writes: On November 9, 2016, Jeffery Mewtamer wrote: Personally, I've never seen the point of e-mail clients and have always used a web browser to check my e-mail. I think the big advantage is off-line usage. If you are connected all the time and have dual-mode access for redundancy (say, a home internet/wifi connection, and a 4G aircard), and don't roam much, then a web-based mail client solves a lot of problems. But when internet access is spotty or unreliable, it's nice to have full access to your email offline. Fortunately, there are lots of options, both within the GUI with varying degrees of accessibility (Thunderbird, Kmail, Claws Mail, and Evolution come to mind) and within the terminal (mutt and alpine being the dominant players, but "alot" and mailx/heirloom mailx also come to mind as well as several available within emacs). -tim ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: iPhone Debate.
Quite a few people can discuss this rationally. I've had both iPhones and Android devices for a few years now. I recently switched my every day smart phone from an iPhone to an Android phone. I still use an iPhone at the office. I see quite a few people on the Android and the iPhone lists I'm on who have experience with both platforms and who recognize each platform's strengths and weaknesses. Unfortunately there are a lot of fan boys on each side, and a lot of dated or misinformation out there, but that doesn't mean there aren't rational people out there too. On 13/11/16 18:33, John G. Heim wrote: A few years ago on the web site of the International Association of Visually Impaired Technologists, www.iavit.org, I set up a page to compare screen readers. I thought I'd collect data and put up a fair, head-to-head comparison. My collaborators at iavit had an intervention with me and got me to take the page down. They're like, "You don't want to open that can of worms." I swear I am the only person on this planet able to discuss this stuff rationally. I have an ancient ipod touch and an iphone. The reason I got the itouch was that back then, all my research indicated that the screen reader for android was no where near as good as voiceover for IOS. As President of IAVIT and an employee at the University of Wisconsin, I have considerable expertise at hand. I also read reviews on-line and asked around on the internet. Voiceover was the clear winner at that time. I did the same research the last time I bought a phone about a year and a half ago. all my research indicated that things had tightened up considerably but that voiceover for IOS was still ahead. Almost everybody I talked to said one thing that bothered me. They said you could get a lot out of an android phone but you'd have to work at it. An iphone just works. I am happy with both my ipod touch and my iphone. I certainly don't think you're making a mistake to buy an iphone. It sounds to me that if you are willing to work at it, you might be able to get more bang for your buck from android. I don't know though, I don't have an android phone. PS: Since when do worms come in a can? On 11/13/2016 05:58 PM, Jeffery Mewtamer wrote: Back when I used an Android device, I don't remember much pressure to use Google services, but that was back in the Android 2.3 days, so it's entirely possible Google has gotten pushier since then. Closest things to a Smartphone I have these days are a Raspberry Pi(running Rasbian, giving me the freedom of Linux) and a Blaze ET, which I think might be running a custom Android and doesn't really have much beyond Text-to-speech of eBooks and media playback going for it, but does those really well(Plays most audio and video formats(MKV being the most notable exclusion) and reads most text formats(Kindle being the most notable exclusion) all in a smartphone-like form factor, a fully voiced interface with physical buttons and a full-sized SD slot. ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: spammer on list
I figured the original intent of these signatures was just free advertising. I first noticed them when I'd see signatures like "This email message was scanned for viruses by some anti-virus application." I personally don't feel any more secure seeing a message like this since it would be trivial for a virus to insert this line itself. I do see some value in letting people know you're sending a message from a device where you may not be comfortable with text input. On 13/11/16 12:26, Tim Chase wrote: On November 13, 2016, Jeffery Mewtamer wrote: Honestly, I've never understood the "sent from x" meme. Like anyone really gives a damn whether you were on your smartphone, or home computer, or a school computer when you typed a message. The original intent of the "sent from my iPhone/Blackberry/Palm/whatever" was to convey "I'm typing this on a device where input is difficult, so please forgive spelling & grammar errors and please excuse the terseness of the reply." It sorta morphed into a bragging about the technologically advanced device you had, and then has since adopted a bit of a jokey feel about it. So I've seen jokes about old hardware such as "Sent from my PDP-11" or "Sent from my Apple II". There are also jokey ones about Internet of Things devices such as "Sent from my toaster/refrigerator". But yeah, at this point in history, nobody really cares from which device you send email. They all do it. (grins) -tim ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: Accessible redhat?
Fedora is an accessible desktop Linux distribution, and I assume it still has some ties to Redhat. Before it was spun off as a community sponsored distribution it used to be called something like Redhat Desktop. I'm not sure if this is what you're asking or not. On 09/11/16 11:50, Mark Peveto wrote: I noticed this list is hosted on redhat.com, but does redhat have accessibility components? I've never heard. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Everything happens after coffee! ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: Internationalizing Screen readers.
Can't you do this from the Voice page of the Orca settings? On 03/11/16 23:29, Jeffery Mewtamer wrote: How do I check what synthesizers are available on my system, which one Orca is using, and how would I change which is being used? -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: Emacspeak and eSpeak
Voice-lock gives you a different voice when the font changes, such as when you're reading a comment in your code or you come across a link in your browser. The default is a UK English voice. I was able to change this in the past, but when I tried to change it recently the same steps didn't work. It's not that big a deal for me, so I haven't put the time into it to figure it out. On 08/10/16 11:52, Fernando Botelho wrote: On 10/08/2016 12:11 AM, Devin Prater wrote: For now, eSpeak cannot use the voice-lock features of Emacspeak. That's my main problem with it's maintenance now, and that I can't change the voice to the En-us language. This sounds bad. What is voice-lock used for? Also, if you cannot use US English, what do you use? Somehow I thought US English would be the default. Fernando ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: Enabling Console Speech Inside Vinux?
Sorry, I didn't see the rest of your questions. I asume you're talking about Vinux. I don't run Windows myself, but I'm pretty sure the wiki points people to some various options to build a bootable USB stick under Windows. Vinux comes up with Orca enabled, and I'm not sure what other screen reader options exist for Linux, so I'm not sure why Vinux would have to provide information on the wiki on how to enable Orca. You can purchase Voxin through the Vinux pages, but I use eSpeak myself. On 16/09/16 22:21, Hart Larry wrote: Well, I tried posting a similar inquiree in the Speakup list, but it never went through. Also, I tried joining the Vinux list, but they require you to sign in to google. So here are comments-and-questions? #1 It would be much simpler if they also were to provide a windows executable, as dealing with an iso is not always convenient. #2 I was pleasantly surprised that installing Vinux along side windows vista did not nuke a JAWS10 authorization. #3 The Vinux WIKI hardly mentions screen-readers-and-how to enable them. I did purchase Voxen, as I would never wanna hear e-speak for anything. #4 Ideally, can some1 please inform what to edit so it will boot in console with either Speakup or YASR? I don't mind having access to a graphical, but I would rather boot in a TCSH shell. I can certainly use Notepad in windows to edit any configs, unless, a duel boot won't see the windows side of the house? #5 And yes I would want great sounding speech in both console-and-graphical on a 64bit image on a laptop. Thanks so much in advance for guidance Hart ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Joining the Vinux list [was {Re: Enabling Console Speech Inside Vinux?"]
I'm not sure why you think you need to sign into Google to join the Vinux mailing list. Try emailing vinux-support+subscr...@googlegroups.com On 16/09/16 22:21, Hart Larry wrote: Well, I tried posting a similar inquiree in the Speakup list, but it never went through. Also, I tried joining the Vinux list, but they require you to sign in to google. So here are comments-and-questions? #1 It would be much simpler if they also were to provide a windows executable, as dealing with an iso is not always convenient. #2 I was pleasantly surprised that installing Vinux along side windows vista did not nuke a JAWS10 authorization. #3 The Vinux WIKI hardly mentions screen-readers-and-how to enable them. I did purchase Voxen, as I would never wanna hear e-speak for anything. #4 Ideally, can some1 please inform what to edit so it will boot in console with either Speakup or YASR? I don't mind having access to a graphical, but I would rather boot in a TCSH shell. I can certainly use Notepad in windows to edit any configs, unless, a duel boot won't see the windows side of the house? #5 And yes I would want great sounding speech in both console-and-graphical on a 64bit image on a laptop. Thanks so much in advance for guidance Hart ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: How did people here learn GUIs
Will apt-get really work in Windows? Adding bash support is a long way from adding Debian's packaging system. This would be great if it were true, but I'm a bit skeptical. On 19/07/16 13:08, Janina Sajka wrote: John, you're correct about most people, but not about most computer professionals, especially not about computer programmers. My evidence is how Microsoft is now adding bash from Ubuntu to Windows 10. All the programmers I know who use Windows are seriously jazzed about this new upgrade to Windows. Just imagine using apt-get to add some package ton the Windows command line environment. This has been an interesting thread. I'm looking forward to reading more. My own personal experience predates accessible Unix shell access. I say Unix, because Linux had not yet been invented. The only way to access a Unix shell in the 1980's was to have an account at some company or university, or to buy monthly access at some service like The Well, or eventually at netcom. Where I lived, that also meant paying for the modem call by the minute, because the calls from San Francisco to the Well, or to Netcom were intra latta calls, and were charged pretty hefty fees. But, this background is important, I think, because we didn't exactly have command line access at services like Compuserve, the Source, or Delphi Internet services. What we had was a menu of options. Sometimes the menu would be something you could arrow or tab through, sometimes it was just printed on screen and you had to type the command you wanted at the prompt. How is that like gui desktops? More primitive, yes, but it's object oriented. You select an object and activate it. Then, you do that again on the next screen. So, early gui was no problem from the conceptual point of view, because it was just a menu of options presented in hieroglyphs rather than words. Of course, those hieroglyphs--we learned to call them icons--weren't accessible because we didn't have a way to associate them with words. We had to do some serious advocacy to get the operating environment retrofitted in a way that would allow words to be associated with those icons. In the early days of gui accessibility several books in braille appeared designed to teach us this graphical environment. I remember a title from the U.K. called "Windows Explained" that came with wonderful graphic representations of various screens on Windows computers. If titles like that aren't available today, somebody should start writing. From the discussion here it's clear to me that a good, conceptual overview of how the gui works, along with some good braille graphics, would likely prove highly valuable. It would be even more valuable if it showed Microsoft, Apple, Chrome and Linux -- but I'm probably dreaming to ask for that much! PS: I got my first real cli when Netcom created a pop in San Francisco. The day I hear about that I signed up. I expected to find menus when I logged in, but no, I just got a shell prompt. I was flummoxed. I called for tech support, because the docs they sent in the mail were only in print. The owner of the company was doing his own tech support back then. When he realizaed I was blind, he showed me how to read usenet news groups and man pages. He promissed to help me if I got stuck, but with usenet and man in my skillset, I never had to call him again. This is a true story, but you were all asking about gui, not cli. Janina John J. Boyer writes: My experience is that most blind people like a GUI with a screen reader better than the command line. Those who have teouble with GUIs, like me, seem to be decidedly in the minority. John On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 12:29:39AM +0200, Anders Holmberg wrote: Hi! Thats intresting. I am the total oposit guy. I had and have no problems learning gui’s but for me the command line is to hard. Although i began with a debian command line system 16 years ago and gave that up for windows a couple of years. Now i am back to vinux and a mac with osx. I whish i was patient enough to learn command line. Maybe i am to dum or maybe i am lazy. /A On 17 Jul 2016, at 22:57, Sam Hartmanwrote: "John" == John J Boyer writes: John> I';ve been trying to get a feel for GUIs for years. Sighted John> colleagues are no help. They only tell me how they use the John> mouse. They won't use a keyboard shourcut even when it is much John> simpler. For example, they will scroll down a long document John> instead of using ctrl+f to find something. i've tried John> unsuccessfully tpo find a Jaws trainer. After I reinstalled John> Windows 7 recently Jaws wouldn't install. I'm now using NVDA John> and I don't think I'll go back to Jaws. This is really interesting, because now I'm realizing that I don't know how to teach someone GUIs on modern equipment at all. I don't know if I can find a solution, but I'll see if I can toss the question around. I hear your frustration
Re: latest ubuntu
What version of Ubuntu have you tried, and how did you try to bring up speech? Did you try alt+super+s for example? Also, Vinux is based on Ubuntu, and it comes up talking. On 07/07/16 06:17, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: Hi. Since I got problems with latest testing version of debian(it refuses to run orca) I have decided to try ubuntu instead. but when trying there is no braille or speech at all. can I install ubuntu in some way? I tried the network install, but when I did ubuntu didn't find my harddrive. just the usb stick. /Kristoffer -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: Sharing files between Linux and Windows
It's been a while, but I don't think you need to install a Samba server on Windows. I've never had to install anything on Windows to share a folder or access folders from other Windows boxes or Linux boxes running a Samba server. You just need to set up a home group in Windows. On 06/07/16 13:39, John J. Boyer wrote: I tried to install a samba server on Windows. However, the Geek Squad agent who was helping said he didn't know enough to proceed. If I go to the Samba website, what should I do? Thanks, John On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 01:22:27PM -0400, Janina Sajka wrote: Ditto. I've also only every used Samba for this. Note, however, that once you have Samba set up, you can perfectly access the Windows folder from the Linux command line. Look at the man pages for the following: smbclient smbget Good luck! Janina John G Heim writes: I have always done this with samba. I never found it particularly difficult. You do have to read/follow the instructions. On 07/05/2016 01:36 PM, Mark Peveto wrote: I'll be interested in the answer to that question myself. I've had some tell me I need to use samba to do that...I've never been able to make it work. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Sent from F123 Visual using alpine 2.20.13 On Tue, 5 Jul 2016, John J. Boyer wrote: I'm going to set up a folder called c:\share on my Windows machine. I want to set up a device on my Linux machine which is connected with this folder over my LAN. I know that this can be done, because I had something similar at one time. However, i'm not certain how to do it again. If I remember, it just took an entry in fstab and an entry in /dev. Thanks. John -- John J. Boyer; President, AbilitiesSoft, Inc. Email: john.bo...@abilitiessoft.org Website: http://www.abilitiessoft.org Status: 501(C)(3) Nonprofit Location: Madison, Wisconsin USA Mission: To develop softwares and provide STEM services for people with disabilities which are available at no cost. ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- -- John G. Heim; jh...@math.wisc.edu; sip://jh...@sip.linphone.org ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Janina Sajka, Phone: +1.443.300.2200 sip:jan...@asterisk.rednote.net Email: jan...@rednote.net Linux Foundation Fellow Executive Chair, Accessibility Workgroup: http://a11y.org The World Wide Web Consortium (W3C), Web Accessibility Initiative (WAI) Chair, Accessible Platform Architectureshttp://www.w3.org/wai/apa ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: how do I find out what's hanging me up?
For those who don't already know, the KNFB Reader app is 33% off in the App Store and 80% off in the Play Store. On 04/07/16 11:26, Mark Peveto wrote: It's not perfect by any means, but brother when you don't have a pair of eyes handy it's better than nothin. I haven't bought knfb yet, although my fiance, Alicia, has it. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Sent from sonar using alpine 2.20.13 On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, John G. Heim wrote: If you can configure a serial console, you would be able to read those messages. But I still say it's a process in an uninterrruptable sleep which means the kernel can't kill it during a normal shutdown. That, in turn, implies that it is a kernel bug in a device driver. In fact, I will wager it's the driver for your sound card and the process that is in an uninterruptable sleep is pulse. That's just a guess though. If the machine is kind of old, it is very likely to have a serial port. Then you need another computer and a null modem cable to configure a serial console. There is a really good serial console howto on the web. No point in me reiterating all that. If you have never configured a serial console before, you are not likely to have a null modem cable lying around. But setting up a serial console is a valuable skill for a blind linux sysadmin to have. You can even do a serial console install of VMware ESXI. PS: Thanks for the tip on tap tap see. I'd never heard of it before. I am going to try it today. When I need to have a screen read to me by my phone, I have been using the knfbReader app. On 07/03/2016 01:08 PM, Mark Peveto wrote: I've been working on this more today, pulling out all the tools I've got. To the point i'm using tap tap see to try and get an idea of what's on my screen when reboot hangs. The most i can get is a message about bus socket display, and a command prompt. Not real helpful, but I guess it's a start. Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Sent from sonar using alpine 2.20.13 On Sat, 2 Jul 2016, Tony Baechler wrote: On 7/2/2016 1:54 AM, Mark Peveto wrote: The short version of a long story. I've just installed sonar on a dell pc. I've also got it installed on a compaq/hp machine, where the followig problem doesn't exist. On the dell, sudo reboot seems to hang. Sudo shutdown works fine. I've tried sudo shutdown -r now, sudo systemctl reboot, and other options. How, without sighted help, can I find out what's causing this machine to hang when I reboot. What's strange is this...why does it shut down just fine, but not reboot? I'm not familiar with Sonar, so consider these random guesses. First, have you looked in /var/log/syslog and kern.log? There might be a process not shutting down properly. If you halt the system, all processes are killed and all filesystems are unmounted. A reboot only resets the system, so I suppose it's possible that a process is behaving badly or the kernel can't unmount a filesystem. I see this sometimes with slow USB devices, like if I copy a ton of files to my SD card. A more likely explanation is an ACPI or power management issue. You didn't say how old the machines are, but it could be a BIOS bug. Recent kernels should work around this. Without knowing the age of the machine and the kernel version, I can only guess. Also, the machine isn't a laptop, right? Laptops usually have power management issues. On Debian, there is a package called acpi-tools. Try installing it if it isn't there or purging it if it's there. I have better luck without it installed. I would bet syslog and kern.log would have clues to your problem. I would check those first. Make note of the time you reboot the machine and look at those files with less. You could try booting a live CD to avoid adding all of the boot messages to the logs. You didn't say if that happens on a live CD, booting from the hard drive, other distros, etc. I''ve noticed most live CDs have strange shutdown problems. You might have to pass a parameter on the kernel command line. Both HP and Dell have issues with Linux. -- Tony Baechler, founder, Baechler Access Technology Services Putting accessibility at the forefront of technology mailto:b...@batsupport.com Phone: 1-619-746-8310 SMS text: 1-619-375-2545 ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list
Re: selecting desktop in vinux
Here are some instructions I got from another list on setting up wifi in either Mate or Gnome: MATE: Sonar Mate is Wi-Fi ready, but it cannot automatically connect to your local network because it has to be set up. To do this 1. Press Ctrl+Alt+Tab to navigate to the bottom panel 2. Press Shift+Tab until you hear "No Network Connection" and press Enter 3. Select the network you want to connect to. You'll hear helpful percentages which tell you how strong the signal strength is, and whether it's secured or not 4. If the network requires a password, you'll get a prompt to enter it, type your password and press enterThat's it. From now on Mate will auto connect to that network when it's in range. GNOME: Sonar Gnome is Wi-Fi ready, but it cannot automatically connect to your local network because it has to be set up. To do this 1. Press Ctrl+Alt+Tab to get to the top bar 2. Tab down to system, and press the right arrow to go into the System list 3. Press the Down Arrow to "Wi-Fi Not Connected" Press right arrow, and press Enter on Select Network 5. Pick the network you want to connect and press Enter (Unlike Mate's applet, gnome's won't tell you either the signal strength or whether it is secure 6. If the network requires a password, you'll get a prompt to enter it, type your password and press enter That's it, from now on Gnome will auto connect to that network when it's in range. Note that I consider Vinux to be real Ubuntu, it's just that someone else already installed three desktops for me to try out, a bunch of accessible applications, Speakup working in a console, Orca coming up talking on the install media and a bunch of other things that I'd just end up doing myself anyway. On 03/06/16 08:04, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: Hi. I found this out some time ago, but have forgotten. vinux comes with mate integrated in the latest release. how do I switch desktops? Also, can you tell me step by step how I can connect to my wireless network? Is it easy to install a normal ubuntu if I want the real ubuntu, and not vinux? /Kristoffer -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: What is the tool for this?
Tim was just asking if you were talking about a file ending in .ppt or one ending in .pptx. You can just tell by the extension of the file name and you don't really need to know when it was created. The .pptx extension indicates that it's a newer file format being used by Microsoft, which is why Tim called it a newer .pptx file. I too appreciate the information Tim provided, and if this lead me to files that had a better format and were easier to work with then I'd do whatever it would take to get them. I can always make things more efficient with scripting if I need to perform a task multiple times, but ending up with a more accurate file will end up saving time in the long run. On 02/06/16 22:03, Karen Lewellen wrote: Oh my goodness! Well fortunately for me it was a simple matter of Ken the administrator at shellworld to install unoconv I ran the program first creating a listener channel as instructed, then ran unoconv on the file which created its pdf. I have no idea weather it was new or old ppt, I did not create the thing. Anyway once in pdf format a simple pdftotext produced the text file. once I found a rather terrific page on running the unoconv program the process likely took me all of 2 minutes. I love that I could have chosen a different format for the output, but between pdftotext when the file is a baby hippopotamus as it was in this case, or robobraille for when the file is more reasonable in size I got the job done. I truly honor the dedication of some, but speaking only for myself having to do all those steps would keep me in another operating system for sure...my professional deadlines alone require swift solutions. My thanks too goes to the person who gave me the name of the front end tool. Seems very shell service friendly much like antiword and unrtf. cheers, Kare On Thu, 2 Jun 2016, Tim Chase wrote: On June 1, 2016, Karen Lewellen wrote: My Linux experience is rooted at shellworld which is now using Ubuntu. I just got a PowerPoint file for a meeting, and because of its size, I cannot use the back door method I normally tap into for converting it into something else. Is there a program like antiword or unrtf to convert PowerPoint at the command line? Is it an old .ppt or a new .pptx file? There was a "ppthtml" tool around that could convert the older .ppt files to HTML in a fashion. The site hosting the source code no longer seems to be available though. If it's a newer .pptx file, it's really just a .zip file with a different extension. So you can mkdir prez mv presentation.pptx prez/presentation.pptx.zip cd prez unzip presentation.pptx.zip cd ppt/slides/ There are bunch of slide*.xml files in here which you can either edit: $EDITOR slide*.xml or strip out the XML tags: for i in {1..20} ; do sed 's/<[^>]*>//g' slide${i}.xml ; done | cat -s > output.txt where "20" is the number of slides in the presentation (which you should be able to get from the output of "ls slide*.xml | wc -l" The reason for using the "for" loop with the numbers is because the slides aren't zero-padded, meaning when it sorts the names, you'd get slide1.xml, slide10.xml, slide11.xml, slide2.xml, slide3.xml, etc. Known as lexicographical sorting, this will be hard to read. So by iterating over them in numerical order, they should make more sense. Alternatively, if you have LibreOffice installed, it should theoretically be able to do conversions. Based on my experimentation, you have to convert the .ppt[x] to PDF first: libreoffice --headless -convert-to pdf presentation.pptx and then convert that to something else. The "poppler-utils" package (at least that's what it's called in Debian) has both a pdftotext and pdftohtml utility. I recommend either plain-text: pdftotext presentation.pdf presentation.txt ${EDITOR:-vi} presentation.txt or HTML: pdftohtml presentation.pdf presentation.html lynx presentation.html I snagged a couple random PPT files off the web and tried the libreoffice method and they all came out much better than I expected (and much, much, MUCH better than the hackish attempts to extract the text as given at the top of this message). So if you have libreoffice + poppler-utils installed and can use those, that's your best bet. If you don't have them and can't get them installed, then using some of the extraction hacks above might at least get some form of the content out. Hopefully these give you some options to get at the content in the presentations. -tim (an avowed despiser of PPT files) ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list
Re: console speech
I'm not sure I'd say Pulse is not compatible with SpeakUp. I use Pulse and SpeakUp all of the time. I'm running Vinux, and I just execute sudo speechd-up before logging into a console, and this gives me speech in the console. This tells me there's something else at play here besides just Pulse and SpeakUp. On 02/06/16 13:33, Alonzo Cuellar wrote: Hi Janina Yes... Pulse is not compatible with speakup. I do miss the console environment. However, I've learned to life with the desktop environment. Since I've not tried using a pure alsa system in ages... I'm not sure how stable it is. Pulse has been very stable in my experiences using the desktop. Alonzo On 06/01/2016 08:58 AM, Janina Sajka wrote: Alonzo: If you're satisfied with working on the desktop alone, then you have pulse support in Speech-Dispatcher and Orca. But this thread was about console speech. I believe most of us who value the console environment have not found pulse compatible with Speakup--which is what most use on the console for a screen reader. Janina Alonzo Cuellar writes: hello, My thoughts. Pulse Audio has more functionality then Alsa. Alsa is great for a low level system meaning only command line access. If you run a graphical environment you will not be able to get discovery of sound automatically unless of course you write some sort of scripts for Alsa. I happen to think though that when Pulse Audio was beginning to be upon the Linux community most of us who used Espeakup relied on Alsa heaviely. Now its a bit of a problem for a user who wants the desktop experience. Thats just what I see. alonzo On 05/26/2016 09:32 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote: Once pulseaudio is purged, try powering off the system then start the system up again and find out what happens. If everything works, the system will reconfigure to account for the absence of pulseaudio and you should have speech back again once that happens. On Thu, 26 May 2016, Mark Peveto wrote: Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 03:32:44 From: Mark PevetoReply-To: Linux for blind general discussion To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: Re: console speech Tried, but it totally jacked up my sound after that. I'm having to reinstall again. On 05/25/2016 01:58 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote: Mark has to get rid of pulseaudio and all of its dependencies. On Wed, 25 May 2016, Willem van der Walt wrote: Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 14:10:06 From: Willem van der Walt Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion To: Linux for blind general discussion Subject: Re: console speech Get rid of pulseaudio. You should be able to google how to do that on your distro. HTH, Willem On Wed, 25 May 2016, Mark Peveto wrote: I'm at my witt's end! I'm working with f123, a manjaro based distro, and have had really good luck, until it comes to console speech using espeakup. It'll speak for about 30 seconds, then I get a pulseaudio error that looks like this. assirtion 'p' failed at pulse/simple.c:273, function pa_simple_write(). Aborting. It's shot me down on every manjaro based distro I've tried. Others have seemed to get speech in console, but I can't seem to make it happen. Vinux has it, and if i have to i'll put vinux on both machines, but that seems a little nuts. I like vinux, and am using it now, but would also like the opportunity to work with these other distros. I've been able to install my favorite programs, but trying to use them from a terminal just doesn't read well, so I need the console. Oh, and before someone says google it, I've done that for a week. Nothing helps. LOL! Mark Peveto Registered Linux user number 600552 Sent from vinux using alpine 2.20.10 ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- This message is subject to the CSIR's copyright terms and conditions, e-mail legal notice, and implemented Open Document Format (ODF) standard. The full disclaimer details can be found at http://www.csir.co.za/disclaimer.html. This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. Please consider the environment before printing this email. ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: vinux questions
Vinux comes up talking when you boot it off of CD or USB stick, so it's easy to install using Orca and eSpeak right out of the box. Depending on how much you want to repartition your disk during the install, the install with Vinux is quite easy. On 20/05/16 02:24, Rob Harris wrote: Good, that'll do. How easy is it to install directly by a speech-needy user? I know XP is long past it's sellbye date. - Original Message - From: "Christopher Chaltain" <chalt...@gmail.com> To: "Linux for blind general discussion" <blinux-list@redhat.com> Sent: Friday, May 20, 2016 12:40 AM Subject: Re: vinux questions Well, by default,you'll get Orca and a software speech synthesizer called eSpeak. On 19/05/16 08:15, Rob Harris wrote: For a former user of many years absence, what is used to make speech in these distros? I had an external Apollo synth at that time, but not now, nor ports to connect it to. Many thanks, BobH. - Original Message - From: "Jude DaShiell" <jdash...@panix.com> To: "Linux for blind general discussion" <blinux-list@redhat.com> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 1:50 PM Subject: Re: vinux questions Language selection should have been done as part of the installation itself. Vinux is a poor choice for text-based anything since it abandoned its text-based branch abck around version 3.x which was 2 or 3 years ago. A better bet for text-based installations is the iso at http://talkingarch.tk/. Although it talks, brltty comes on the iso so you can start that up in the usual way if braille is more effective than speech for you. It may be possible to enable speech and braille, I don't know since I never had the funds to purchase my own braille display and use it with any of these Linux distros. On Thu, 19 May 2016, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 08:19:38 From: Kristoffer Gustafsson <kg.kristof...@gmail.com> Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion <blinux-list@redhat.com> To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: vinux questions Hi. Finally I got the vinux live image working on my computer. I've got some questions before I decide to use this or debian. 1. can I select the language I want? I'm using swedish. 2. how do I do if I want to update packages? In debian I'm using apt-get for this. 3. can I compile new kernels, and install whatever I want just like in debian? 4. can I do a text based install of vinux with my braille display? I like text based things more than graphical. /Kristoffer -- Kristoffer Gustafsson Sal?ngsgatan 7a tel:033-12 60 93 mobil: 0730-500934 ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list
Re: vinux questions
Well, by default,you'll get Orca and a software speech synthesizer called eSpeak. On 19/05/16 08:15, Rob Harris wrote: For a former user of many years absence, what is used to make speech in these distros? I had an external Apollo synth at that time, but not now, nor ports to connect it to. Many thanks, BobH. - Original Message - From: "Jude DaShiell"To: "Linux for blind general discussion" Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 1:50 PM Subject: Re: vinux questions Language selection should have been done as part of the installation itself. Vinux is a poor choice for text-based anything since it abandoned its text-based branch abck around version 3.x which was 2 or 3 years ago. A better bet for text-based installations is the iso at http://talkingarch.tk/. Although it talks, brltty comes on the iso so you can start that up in the usual way if braille is more effective than speech for you. It may be possible to enable speech and braille, I don't know since I never had the funds to purchase my own braille display and use it with any of these Linux distros. On Thu, 19 May 2016, Kristoffer Gustafsson wrote: Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 08:19:38 From: Kristoffer Gustafsson Reply-To: Linux for blind general discussion To: blinux-list@redhat.com Subject: vinux questions Hi. Finally I got the vinux live image working on my computer. I've got some questions before I decide to use this or debian. 1. can I select the language I want? I'm using swedish. 2. how do I do if I want to update packages? In debian I'm using apt-get for this. 3. can I compile new kernels, and install whatever I want just like in debian? 4. can I do a text based install of vinux with my braille display? I like text based things more than graphical. /Kristoffer -- Kristoffer Gustafsson Sal?ngsgatan 7a tel:033-12 60 93 mobil: 0730-500934 ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list -- Christopher (CJ) chaltain at Gmail ___ Blinux-list mailing list Blinux-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/blinux-list