Re: [Bloat] [Rpm] Ookla - Introducing a Better Measure of Latency

2022-05-12 Thread Rich Brown
This is very cool! I'm glad to see them embrace "download ping" and "upload 
ping". 

> On May 12, 2022, at 1:15 PM, Christoph Paasch via Rpm 
>  wrote:
> 
> Ookla's measure of "loaded latency":
> 
> https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducing-loaded-latency 
> 
> 
> This will hopefully be a shift in how operators approach the bufferbloat 
> problem.
> 
> 
> Christoph
> ___
> Rpm mailing list
> r...@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/rpm

___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


Re: [Bloat] Ookla - Introducing a Better Measure of Latency

2022-05-12 Thread Klatsky, Carl via Bloat
Its good that they are running the latency test also during the load test, but 
from what it looks like, they seem to be running the latency test to the same 
server as the load test.  I think a more realistic test is to run the load test 
to one server and the latency test to a different server.  That's a more 
realistic use case...

Regards,
Carl Klatsky

-Original Message-
From: Bloat  On Behalf Of Christoph Paasch 
via Bloat
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2022 4:01 PM
To: nich...@pollere.net
Cc: bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
Subject: Re: [Bloat] Ookla - Introducing a Better Measure of Latency

I'm not aware of any rigorous study. But, just from the code, I know ICMP ping 
in many cases has a different traffic-class and thus implicitly gets quite a 
different treatment than real traffic.

However, Ookla uses TCP (port 8080) to probe the latency in their app.


Christoph

> On May 12, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Kathleen Nichols  wrote:
>
> a ping by any other name...
>
> Has anyone ever done a rigorous study to see how well ping delays correspond 
> to the delay that information-carrying packets experience?
>
> On 5/12/22 10:15 AM, Christoph Paasch via Bloat wrote:
>> Ookla's measure of "loaded latency":
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducin
>> g-loaded-latency__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!DHnGDBw2sqsRwHiidAQUOhjXEavZmBOtJKb_IzPhxMm2vqUPyRC2pkVnScJId_KdaNVLsOS7sD0E8QRQ0m8B7LqBavY$
>>   
>> >  > This will hopefully be a shift in how operators approach the bufferbloat 
>> problem.
>> Christoph
>> ___
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bl
>> oat__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!DHnGDBw2sqsRwHiidAQUOhjXEavZmBOtJKb_IzPhxMm2vqUPyR
>> C2pkVnScJId_KdaNVLsOS7sD0E8QRQ0m8BllXPjdw$
>
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/blo
> at__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!DHnGDBw2sqsRwHiidAQUOhjXEavZmBOtJKb_IzPhxMm2vqUPyRC2
> pkVnScJId_KdaNVLsOS7sD0E8QRQ0m8BllXPjdw$

___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat__;!!CQl3mcHX2A!DHnGDBw2sqsRwHiidAQUOhjXEavZmBOtJKb_IzPhxMm2vqUPyRC2pkVnScJId_KdaNVLsOS7sD0E8QRQ0m8BllXPjdw$
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


Re: [Bloat] Ookla - Introducing a Better Measure of Latency

2022-05-12 Thread Sebastian Moeller
Hi Christoph,

nice! Thanks for posting.


For Android (and iOS) Ookla's speedtest app now reports a "Detailed result" 
page which contains:
1) Upload and download rates (albeit without information what exactly was 
measured) 
2) Data volume used per direction (but not the precise duration of the test)
3) Idle, download, upload responsiveness measures:
(probably) the average, the jitter, the minimum, and the maximum
4) Packet loss percentage

This is quite an improvement and achievement! I would wish for a bit more 
information about the details, like how was latency exactly measured, how many 
probes were used per direction and what are the individual delay values...

Unfortunately, the macos client seems not yet updated and the web based test 
also still only reports the idle RTT. I hope it is only a matter of time for 
those to be updated.

Regards
Sebastian




> On May 12, 2022, at 19:15, Christoph Paasch via Bloat 
>  wrote:
> 
> Ookla's measure of "loaded latency":
> 
> https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducing-loaded-latency
> 
> This will hopefully be a shift in how operators approach the bufferbloat 
> problem.
> 
> 
> Christoph
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


Re: [Bloat] Ookla - Introducing a Better Measure of Latency

2022-05-12 Thread Christoph Paasch via Bloat
I'm not aware of any rigorous study. But, just from the code, I know ICMP ping 
in many cases has a different traffic-class and thus implicitly gets quite a 
different treatment than real traffic.

However, Ookla uses TCP (port 8080) to probe the latency in their app.


Christoph

> On May 12, 2022, at 12:44 PM, Kathleen Nichols  wrote:
> 
> a ping by any other name...
> 
> Has anyone ever done a rigorous study to see how well ping delays correspond 
> to the delay that information-carrying packets experience?
> 
> On 5/12/22 10:15 AM, Christoph Paasch via Bloat wrote:
>> Ookla's measure of "loaded latency":
>> https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducing-loaded-latency 
>> 
>> This will hopefully be a shift in how operators approach the bufferbloat 
>> problem.
>> Christoph
>> ___
>> Bloat mailing list
>> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
>> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat
> 
> ___
> Bloat mailing list
> Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
> https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat

___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


Re: [Bloat] Ookla - Introducing a Better Measure of Latency

2022-05-12 Thread Kathleen Nichols

a ping by any other name...

Has anyone ever done a rigorous study to see how well ping delays 
correspond to the delay that information-carrying packets experience?


On 5/12/22 10:15 AM, Christoph Paasch via Bloat wrote:

Ookla's measure of "loaded latency":

https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducing-loaded-latency 



This will hopefully be a shift in how operators approach the bufferbloat 
problem.



Christoph

___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


[Bloat] Ookla - Introducing a Better Measure of Latency

2022-05-12 Thread Christoph Paasch via Bloat
Ookla's measure of "loaded latency":

https://www.ookla.com/articles/introducing-loaded-latency 


This will hopefully be a shift in how operators approach the bufferbloat 
problem.


Christoph___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat