Re: [Bloat] FCC requires broadband "Nutritional Label"

2022-11-28 Thread Livingood, Jason via Bloat
On 11/18/22, 07:36, "Bloat on behalf of Rich Brown via Bloat" 
 
wrote:
> Even though the label only specifies "typical latency", I have a sense that 
> this is a good step forward. If your ISP specifies 5 msec as "typical" and 
> their crummy router is bloated, can you get a repair if you call them and say 
> that it's averaging 150msec? 

FWIW I think there's now a further comment period open on the label. I am sure 
comments around (working) latency would be welcome...

Jason


___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


Re: [Bloat] FCC requires broadband "Nutritional Label"

2022-11-19 Thread Jan Ceuleers via Bloat
On 18/11/2022 13:36, Rich Brown via Bloat wrote:
> Even though the label only specifies "typical latency", I have a sense that 
> this is a good step forward.

Shame that the latency has to be specified in Ms (megaseconds) though.
ISPs will feel justified in rounding it down to 0.

___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


Re: [Bloat] FCC requires broadband "Nutritional Label"

2022-11-18 Thread Dave Collier-Brown via Bloat


On 11/18/22 07:36, Rich Brown via Bloat wrote:

Forwarded from NANOG list:


The effective date will be determined later, after publication in the
Federal Register and OMB review under PRA.

November 17, 2022?The Federal Communications Commission today
unveiled new rules that will for the first time require broadband
providers to display easy-tounderstand labels to allow consumers to
comparison shop for broadband services. The Report and Order approved by
the Commission creates rules that require broadband providers to
display, at the point of sale, labels that show key information consumers
want?prices, speeds,fees, data allowances, and other critical
information. The labels resemble the well-known nutrition labels that
appear on food products.

https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-requires-broadband-providers-display-labels-help-consumers-0

Even though the label only specifies "typical latency", I have a sense that this is a 
good step forward. If your ISP specifies 5 msec as "typical" and their crummy router is 
bloated, can you get a repair if you call them and say that it's averaging 150msec?

At what point does the expense of handling all the tech support calls outweigh 
the expense of actually making (and deploying) good routers?


For small ISPs, pretty quickly (eg, the late UUNET Canada, where we all
fit in one room)

For the duopolists, not until the legal department says "We've just had
a class-action suit filed against us, is it cheaper to fight it or to
fix whatever they're talking about?"

--dave c-b (;-))

--
David Collier-Brown, | Always do right. This will gratify
System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
dave.collier-br...@indexexchange.com |  -- Mark Twain


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER : This telecommunication, including any 
and all attachments, contains confidential information intended only for the 
person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any dissemination, distribution, copying or 
disclosure is strictly prohibited and is not a waiver of confidentiality. If 
you have received this telecommunication in error, please notify the sender 
immediately by return electronic mail and delete the message from your inbox 
and deleted items folders. This telecommunication does not constitute an 
express or implied agreement to conduct transactions by electronic means, nor 
does it constitute a contract offer, a contract amendment or an acceptance of a 
contract offer. Contract terms contained in this telecommunication are subject 
to legal review and the completion of formal documentation and are not binding 
until same is confirmed in writing and has been signed by an authorized 
signatory.
___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat


[Bloat] FCC requires broadband "Nutritional Label"

2022-11-18 Thread Rich Brown via Bloat

Forwarded from NANOG list:

> The effective date will be determined later, after publication in the 
> Federal Register and OMB review under PRA.
> 
> November 17, 2022?The Federal Communications Commission today
> unveiled new rules that will for the first time require broadband 
> providers to display easy-tounderstand labels to allow consumers to 
> comparison shop for broadband services. The Report and Order approved by 
> the Commission creates rules that require broadband providers to
> display, at the point of sale, labels that show key information consumers 
> want?prices, speeds,fees, data allowances, and other critical 
> information. The labels resemble the well-known nutrition labels that 
> appear on food products.
> 
> https://www.fcc.gov/document/fcc-requires-broadband-providers-display-labels-help-consumers-0

Even though the label only specifies "typical latency", I have a sense that 
this is a good step forward. If your ISP specifies 5 msec as "typical" and 
their crummy router is bloated, can you get a repair if you call them and say 
that it's averaging 150msec? 

At what point does the expense of handling all the tech support calls outweigh 
the expense of actually making (and deploying) good routers?


___
Bloat mailing list
Bloat@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/bloat