[BlueOnyx:10859] Re: 'Add Static Route" strangeness - Added Information
>> Hello, >> >> In an updated 5107R on System Settings / TCP/IP / Modify Static Routes / Add >> / Network Interface there are four ( 4 ) interfaces listed in the 'Network >> Interface' dropdown ( with two used in the system/install ) but all point to >> eth3 with the result that you cannot add a static route through the GUI as >> it tells you that the route you are entering cannot use the route assigned >> to 'eth3' which obviously doesn't exist. > Are you using a physical or virtual server in this case? It's a physical server ( no virtualisation ), iLO, NIC1 and NIC2 available only on a HP DL360 G4. I did build the drives on a DL360 G4 then moved it to another DL360 G$ ( modified the relevant rules files to remove the hardware addresses as per list emails that I read to handle the situation ). The System Settings / TCP/IP screen shows four adapters but only the first two are filled/used. The machine is working well and routing is successful... I did add the routes to the route table manually because I 'had to have them' but this issue was apparent before I manually added the routes. If I add more routes ( that are not manually added in the existing route table ) the same error is apparent. Tony ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10858] Re: 'Add Static Route" strangeness
>> Hello, >> >> In an updated 5107R on System Settings / TCP/IP / Modify Static Routes / Add >> / Network Interface there are four ( 4 ) interfaces listed in the 'Network >> Interface' dropdown ( with two used in the system/install ) but all point to >> eth3 with the result that you cannot add a static route through the GUI as >> it tells you that the route you are entering cannot use the route assigned >> to 'eth3' which obviously doesn't exist. > Are you using a physical or virtual server in this case? It's a physical server ( no virtualisation ), iLO, NIC1 and NIC2 available only on a HP DL360 G4. Tony ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10857] Re: All email going to gue
Now all email is getting this for inbound and outbound Milter: data, reject=451 4.3.2 Please try again later RC ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10856] Re: Web Ownership
It seems when the ownership is changed to apache the files read apache:site_owner since I manage all the 15 WPs sites it is an easier situation that the one you have to address. As noted the suPHP just doesn't run consistent throughout the sites for me. In times past I changed the ownership to apache and did the WP update. Having installed nearly two dozen WP sites one would think I could have figured this out by now. I pulled two WP sites up side-by-side from the command line and made them both the same according to the one that was working but that didn't help. I am still doing some research in the WP forums but they point toward ownership and file permissions issues. I am running dir 755 and files 644. Keep me posted if you find something and I will try it on my end. David. At 07:41 AM 6/24/2012, you wrote: > >I have tried this on several occassions for WP and it seems to be a hit and >miss. > >Hi David, > >My problem is that I have users with WordPress as only part of their site. >If I have the wp-content folder owned by Apache then the user can upload >files via the admin panel as well as FTP to other areas of the site. I >imagine if I had all WP files owned by apache:apache then they could update >the engine as well. > >It just seems odd that a user can change the ownership from apache to a site >admin user but not the other way around. > > >DD > >___ >Blueonyx mailing list >Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it >http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx > > >- >No virus found in this message. >Checked by AVG - www.avg.com >Version: 2012.0.2180 / Virus Database: 2433/5067 - Release Date: 06/13/12 >Internal Virus Database is out of date. ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10855] All email going to gue
Users can not get new email all in mailq. Getting this error: Jun 24 11:43:08 grouper sendmail[31952]: q5OFghLV029849: SYSERR(root): hash map "Alias1": missing map file /etc/mail/aliases.majordomo.db: No such file or directory Yes the file are gone Anyone have any ideas how to fix? I have restarted and reboot multiple times Thanks in advance RC ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10854] Re: Web Ownership
>I have tried this on several occassions for WP and it seems to be a hit and miss. Hi David, My problem is that I have users with WordPress as only part of their site. If I have the wp-content folder owned by Apache then the user can upload files via the admin panel as well as FTP to other areas of the site. I imagine if I had all WP files owned by apache:apache then they could update the engine as well. It just seems odd that a user can change the ownership from apache to a site admin user but not the other way around. DD ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10853] Re: php soap
On 6/24/2012 9:44 PM, Maurice de Laat wrote: > Hi Steve, > > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:26:41AM +0100, Steven Howes wrote: > >> Assuming you are using the standard PHP version, you should be able to >> just yum install php-soap. If you're using an upgrade package, you'd >> have to speak to whoever supplied that. > Thank you. I am using the standard PHP version. But I am wondering, since > the GUI is heavily dependent on the right PHP version and modules, if it > would be without risk to do a yum install php-soap. Installing that module should not cause an issue for the gui. Regards, Greg. ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10852] Re: 'Add Static Route" strangeness
On 6/24/2012 6:19 PM, Support wrote: > Hello, > > In an updated 5107R on System Settings / TCP/IP / Modify Static Routes / Add > / Network Interface there are four ( 4 ) interfaces listed in the 'Network > Interface' dropdown ( with two used in the system/install ) but all point to > eth3 with the result that you cannot add a static route through the GUI as > it tells you that the route you are entering cannot use the route assigned > to 'eth3' which obviously doesn't exist. Are you using a physical or virtual server in this case? ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10851] Re: php soap
Hi Steve, On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:26:41AM +0100, Steven Howes wrote: > Assuming you are using the standard PHP version, you should be able to > just yum install php-soap. If you're using an upgrade package, you'd > have to speak to whoever supplied that. Thank you. I am using the standard PHP version. But I am wondering, since the GUI is heavily dependent on the right PHP version and modules, if it would be without risk to do a yum install php-soap. -- Maurice de Laat ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10850] 'Add Static Route" strangeness
Hello, In an updated 5107R on System Settings / TCP/IP / Modify Static Routes / Add / Network Interface there are four ( 4 ) interfaces listed in the 'Network Interface' dropdown ( with two used in the system/install ) but all point to eth3 with the result that you cannot add a static route through the GUI as it tells you that the route you are entering cannot use the route assigned to 'eth3' which obviously doesn't exist. Tony ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
[BlueOnyx:10849] Re: Timezone strangeness
> I have several BlueOnyx servers running as virtual machines on a Proxmox > server. Two of them, a 5106R and a 5107R when rebooted set the time/date as > GMT. It should be GMT +10, so I have to manually set them each roboot. > I have checked in the GUI and the zone is correct. Can anyone suggest where > else I could look for the problem? > - Ernie. I had ( today ) a brand new 5107R server install doing exactly the same thing and as the date/time is incredibly important on this machine ( HP DL360 G4 ) I have checked everywhere for an invalid configuration without success. And so I was wondering if it was because of this; ntpd0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ntpdate 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off So based on what I read on the interweb I did; service ntpd start chkconfig ntpd on ntpd0:off 1:off 2:on3:on4:on5:on6:off ntpdate 0:off 1:off 2:off 3:off 4:off 5:off 6:off ... and has this has seemingly fixed my issue ( GUI changes and machine restarts no longer result in an incorrect date/time ). Tony ___ Blueonyx mailing list Blueonyx@mail.blueonyx.it http://mail.blueonyx.it/mailman/listinfo/blueonyx
