[board-discuss] IMPORTANT LibreOffice Conference

2022-06-15 Thread Italo Vignoli
We have been silent about the LibreOffice Conference because we are 
experiencing a few unexpected logistic issues. We are working hard to 
solve them as soon as possible, but in the meantime we ask you to wait 
before confirming your travel programs, or to get in touch with us if 
you have already booked your flights.


The objective is to keep the dates of the conference, but the location 
may change to another city. We will communicate the details in the next 
couple of weeks.


--
Italo Vignoli - LibreOffice Marketing & PR
mobile/signal +39.348.5653829 - email it...@libreoffice.org
GPG Key ID - 0xAAB8D5C0
DB75 1534 3FD0 EA5F 56B5 FDA6 DE82 934C AAB8 D5C0


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] [DECISION] TDF to publish LibreOffice in app stores

2022-06-15 Thread Gabriel Masei

On 2022-06-08 12:44, Florian Effenberger wrote:

Simon Phipps wrote on 04.06.22 at 10:59:
Can you tell us who "attended" the "meeting" please as only 5 votes 
were recorded so 2 must have been absent.


that's something for the board to decide, how they want to handle this
- happy to update the vote template if the board is fine with that.


I'm fine with it.

Best,
Gabriel

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Collabora Productivity from AppStore - bug reports

2022-06-15 Thread Jan Holesovsky
Hi Alex, Adolfo, all,

Thank you for the pointers to the bugreports!

More inline:

Alexander Thurgood píše v St 15. 06. 2022 v 10:26 +0200:

> It is neither a question of overblowing or "paranoia", (thanks for
> the 
> gratuitous comment by the way, in tdf#147130), but I raised the issue
> as 
> to where bugs for Collabora should be reported when it was first 
> released via the AppStore and was told, multiple times, and no less
> by 
> Michael Meeks himself, to report them in the LO BZ.

Regardless of my hat & the issue at hand, I'd support using the
LibreOffice bugzilla even for the downstream reports, because
ultimately, the code will end up in the LibreOffice repository either
way.

The reason is that we (TDF hat) would like to have all the patches up-
streamed, even the packaging related ones (under the distro-
config/...).  Piling the down-stream patches in their own bug reporting
systems will only lead to problems long-term.

To avoid the feel that the bugzilla is misused, I think it might be
useful to create a categories for such bugs (where we don't have them
yet) - so that the volunteers can decide if they want to spend their
time on triaging such bug reports or not.

But ultimately - the categorization is up to the QA team to decide. 
Xisco - what is your take please?

> Seemingly, and without any other form of policy discussion, that has
> now 
> changed.
> 
> Where is the due process in that decision ?

In general, when it seems that an existing code-related policy does not
fit, the best way is to bring it to the ESC so that the pro's and con's
can be properly discussed from the technical point of view.  In case
you think a decision is needed, it would be great to have you both
joining the meeting on Thursday, so that we can talk this through.

Either way - thank you so much Alex and Adolfo for your contributions,
much appreciate that! & hope this is all just a misunderstanding.

All the best,
Kendy


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



QA policy discussion (was: [board-discuss] Collabora Productivity from AppStore - bug reports)

2022-06-15 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Hi *,

if possible, I would prefer if the discussion on what is, and is not,
a valid bug report on TDF's bugzilla would happen in the QA project
first and foremost.

I do see valid points on Alex' side (who spent a lot of time reporting
bugs), and also from Adolfo (who is right, that e.g. downstream Linux
distro bugs where always encouraged to be reported in distro
bugtrackers - because many times, it was e.g. a Gentoo quirk that
triggered a problem).

In any case, trying to be considerate to each other and understanding
the frustrations of the other side, would be my general wish,
all-over.

There is possibly a more general question behind this (along the
'using foundation resources' issue), which perhaps the board can form
an opinion on. Then it would be on-topic here.

Cheers, Thorsten

-- 
Thorsten Behrens, Director, Member of the Board
The Document Foundation, Kurfürstendamm 188, 10707 Berlin, Germany
Rechtsfähige Stiftung des bürgerlichen Rechts
Legal details: http://www.documentfoundation.org/imprint



signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [board-discuss] Drafting job posting for "part-time web technology expert"

2022-06-15 Thread Ilmari Lauhakangas

On 15.6.2022 10.33, Uwe Altmann wrote:

Hi Flo

Am 23.05.22 um 10:38 schrieb Florian Effenberger:


The latest version is available at 
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/CSzrtsKJt4GKY7P


For any last comments and edits, please send them in by Friday this 
week. We then will finalize the job posting and aim for a publication 
possibly next week.


Sorry for being (too?) late, just found the time to read it: Perhaps 
Django/Python skills for the new MC application would also be a "nice to 
have" and worth mentioning?


That is generally implied in the nice-to-have item for backend dev 
experience.


Ilmari

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Collabora Productivity from AppStore - bug reports

2022-06-15 Thread Alexander Thurgood



It is neither a question of overblowing or "paranoia", (thanks for the 
gratuitous comment by the way, in tdf#147130), but I raised the issue as 
to where bugs for Collabora should be reported when it was first 
released via the AppStore and was told, multiple times, and no less by 
Michael Meeks himself, to report them in the LO BZ.



Seemingly, and without any other form of policy discussion, that has now 
changed.


Where is the due process in that decision ?

This is the problem I'm pointing out.

Secondarily, accusing people of abusing TDF resources in bug reports 
(whether they take it personally, or whether it is directed more 
generally at Collabora) doesn't help the situation IMHO.



Alex



Le 15/06/2022 à 09:56, Adolfo Jayme Barrientos a écrit :

It is sad how you're willing to misinterpret and overblow it, Alex.

Collabora Office is a downstream (i.e. derived) project of 
LibreOffice, and although it is based on the same codebase, it may 
have its own bugs.


It is not fair for unpaid, volunteer triagers to spend time triaging 
their software's bugs in a bug tracking system pertaining to a 
different project, that is all. The NOTOURBUG status is meant to 
indicate that the bug simply needs to be moved to a more appropriate 
instance, as we do with e.g. snapcraft-related issues, which I triage 
on Launchpad.net. NOTOUTBUG does *not* mean that your bug is invalid.


I am sorry because I am terse in my non-native languages, but really, 
there is no conspiracy behind it. I translate Collabora's software for 
free, but as you may note, they host their Weblate platform 
independently from TDF's -- their Jenkins is similarly separately 
hosted; their online help site is, too. For GOOD REASON.


Adolfo


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Collabora Productivity from AppStore - bug reports

2022-06-15 Thread Heiko Tietze

On 15.06.22 09:37, Alexander Thurgood wrote:

tdf#147337


Commented on the ticket. The issue (if it's a problem at all) does not depend on 
the packaging/distribution and is clearly not NOTOURBUG.


OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Re: [board-discuss] Collabora Productivity from AppStore - bug reports

2022-06-15 Thread Adolfo Jayme Barrientos
It is sad how you're willing to misinterpret and overblow it, Alex.

Collabora Office is a downstream (i.e. derived) project of LibreOffice, and
although it is based on the same codebase, it may have its own bugs.

It is not fair for unpaid, volunteer triagers to spend time triaging their
software's bugs in a bug tracking system pertaining to a different project,
that is all. The NOTOURBUG status is meant to indicate that the bug simply
needs to be moved to a more appropriate instance, as we do with e.g.
snapcraft-related issues, which I triage on Launchpad.net. NOTOUTBUG does
*not* mean that your bug is invalid.

I am sorry because I am terse in my non-native languages, but really, there
is no conspiracy behind it. I translate Collabora's software for free, but
as you may note, they host their Weblate platform independently from TDF's
-- their Jenkins is similarly separately hosted; their online help site is,
too. For GOOD REASON.

Adolfo


Re: [board-discuss] Collabora Productivity from AppStore - bug reports

2022-06-15 Thread Alexander Thurgood

Hi Sophie,

Thanks.

I have no particular personal illusion that Collabora will fix any of 
the bugs I've reported against that product, especially if its AppStore 
offering is to be replaced by the TDF one (or perhaps they are going to 
compete with each other, I'm not entirely sure ?), so in the end, my 
objections may be moot.


I look forward to following the discussion on this point in due course :-)

For the record, as an example of one of the bug reports which does not 
yet appear to have had the corresponding comments removed: tdf#147337


Quote:

"Please: Collabora bugs should be reported to a Collabora bug tracker. 
The Foundation’s resources should not be abused to report issues in 
commercial derivates."



Being accused of abusing TDF resources after having offered my time 
since the very beginning of the LO project, and before with SO/OOo/AOO, 
is not the way to retain volunteers like myself, quite the contrary.


In fact, had I been of a less phlegmatic disposition, I would have told 
you all where to go, in no uncertain terms.



Alex



Le 14/06/2022 à 21:58, sophi a écrit :

Hi Alex,
Le 14/06/2022 à 09:52, Alexander Thurgood a écrit :

Hello to all,

Might I suggest that a discussion be had, either by the Board, or the 
ESC, and a decision be made of public record, as to where bugs 
relating to Collabora Productivity are to be reported ?


Agreed on the need to have a discussion on that.


I have reported a number of bugs against Collabora Productivity in 
the LibreOffice bugzilla _*over several years*_ (basically since the 
product was first released via the AppStore).


and thanks a lot for your continuous contributions to the project 
since so many years :)


I see now that my reports are being closed as NOTOURBUG, and being 
told that I should report them to Collabora.


Having been consistently told to report them on the LO BZ over these 
many years, this approach has come both as somewhat of a surprise, 
and a disappointment.



Questions:

1) when was this change decided ? I see nothing of public record ?


From what I know, nothing has been decided yet, as you said this is 
something that we should discuss


2) if the decision wass made to shift responsibility for these back 
to Collabora, would someone from that entity please indicate where 
the bugs should now be reported, or whether there is some mechanism 
in place to automatically transfer the bugs to a corresponding 
Collabora instance like we did when we moved from Apache BZ ?


We have to give time to time (F. Mitterrand for those who are not 
French ;)



I have the distinct and unpleasant impression that the current 
tensions within the Board have led to an undocumented decision to 
purge all traces of Collabora bugs from the LO BZ instance without 
regard for the people who have actually tried to help improve the 
product by reporting those bugs.


Your impression is not the right one. There are no decisions yet on 
this process. This leads to the unfortunate situation where both the 
member closing your bugs and you are right or wrong.


I would have appreciated there being some kind of public decision 
making process in this regard, with a means for currently reported 
bugs to be automatically transferred.

For sure there will be and you pointed a very valuable lack of process.



Closing them as NOTOURBUG without any due process just smacks of 
petty revenge actions, and does not bode well for the future 
wellbeing of the project IMO.


In the community there are different understandings and different 
behaviors. Fortunately we are able to follow-up on almost all of them. 
But I'm sure the closing of your bugs have nothing to do with a hidden 
agenda or something like that. Once the settings of the app stores 
will be done, there will be a lot to decide and discuss and I'm sure 
(and will work for :) it will happen in a sane way.


On your underlying point about the tensions in the board, there are 
and we are all well aware of them, as is the board. Their has been a 
two, almost three years break in relations because of the pandemic. 
This is not easy to work remotely, but it has been even worse for us 
distributed around the globe. So bear with all of them, with all of us 
and please, continue to share all your concerns, this is how we will 
manage to solve problems and grow as a project.


Cheers
Sophie



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Collabora Productivity from AppStore - bug reports

2022-06-15 Thread Alexander Thurgood

Hi Jan,

For example :

tdf#147337

The others (there were at least 2 other instances, for example 
tdf#147130), all seem to have had similar comments deleted in the interim.



Alex



Le 14/06/2022 à 19:42, Jan Holesovsky a écrit :

Hi Alex,

Alexander Thurgood píše v Út 14. 06. 2022 v 09:52 +0200:


I have reported a number of bugs against Collabora Productivity in
the LibreOffice bugzilla over several years (basically since the
product was first released via the AppStore).

I see now that my reports are being closed as NOTOURBUG, and being
told that I should report them to Collabora.

I have no idea what is going on, can you please point me to some bugs
where this is happening?

Thank you in advance!

All the best,
Kendy



--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [board-discuss] Drafting job posting for "part-time web technology expert"

2022-06-15 Thread Uwe Altmann

Hi Flo

Am 23.05.22 um 10:38 schrieb Florian Effenberger:


The latest version is available at 
https://nextcloud.documentfoundation.org/s/CSzrtsKJt4GKY7P


For any last comments and edits, please send them in by Friday this week. 
We then will finalize the job posting and aim for a publication possibly 
next week.


Sorry for being (too?) late, just found the time to read it: Perhaps 
Django/Python skills for the new MC application would also be a "nice to 
have" and worth mentioning?

--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Uwe Altmann

--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy