Re: [tdf-internal] [board-discuss] Conflict of interests - Agenda for TDF board meeting on Monday, September 19th at 1800 Berlin time (UTC+2)

2022-09-17 Thread Andreas Mantke

Hi all,

Am 17.09.22 um 12:42 schrieb Andreas Mantke:

Hi all,

Am 16.09.22 um 17:18 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:

Dear all,

Paolo Vecchi wrote:

Some members of the board alleged that I was in Conflict of
Interests (CoI)
in regards to LibreOffice Online (LOOL) and Collabora Office Online
(COOL).


Correction - the board has determined that Paolo has/had a private
interest
in Online. According to our CoI policy, the next step is now to
determine,
if an actual conflict of interest is there.


it would be of interest for the community who has made this decision.
Did all members of the board with a potential personal or professional
interest in COOL/LOOL abstain from that decision according to the TDF
CoI policy?

Because I think the board is _always_ following its CoI policy it
shouldn't be an issue to inform the community about the board members
who take the decision and about their vote.

If I remember correctly to be as transparent as possible is one of TDF
goals. It's a great goal and one of TDF's assets.


and I found the thread where it was proposed to be transparent about
board decisions and the voting:

https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/2022/msg00409.html

Regards,
Andreas

--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [tdf-internal] [board-discuss] Conflict of interests - Agenda for TDF board meeting on Monday, September 19th at 1800 Berlin time (UTC+2)

2022-09-17 Thread Andreas Mantke

Hi all,

Am 16.09.22 um 17:18 schrieb Thorsten Behrens:

Dear all,

Paolo Vecchi wrote:

Some members of the board alleged that I was in Conflict of Interests (CoI)
in regards to LibreOffice Online (LOOL) and Collabora Office Online (COOL).


Correction - the board has determined that Paolo has/had a private interest
in Online. According to our CoI policy, the next step is now to determine,
if an actual conflict of interest is there.


it would be of interest for the community who has made this decision.
Did all members of the board with a potential personal or professional
interest in COOL/LOOL abstain from that decision according to the TDF
CoI policy?

Because I think the board is _always_ following its CoI policy it
shouldn't be an issue to inform the community about the board members
who take the decision and about their vote.

If I remember correctly to be as transparent as possible is one of TDF
goals. It's a great goal and one of TDF's assets.

Regards,
Andreas

--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog


--
To unsubscribe e-mail to: board-discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/
Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive: https://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/board-discuss/
Privacy Policy: https://www.documentfoundation.org/privacy



Re: [tdf-internal] [board-discuss] Conflict of interests - Agenda for TDF board meeting on Monday, September 19th at 1800 Berlin time (UTC+2)

2022-09-16 Thread Thorsten Behrens
Dear all,

Paolo Vecchi wrote:
> Some members of the board alleged that I was in Conflict of Interests (CoI)
> in regards to LibreOffice Online (LOOL) and Collabora Office Online (COOL).
>
Correction - the board has determined that Paolo has/had a private interest
in Online. According to our CoI policy, the next step is now to determine,
if an actual conflict of interest is there.

> I wouldn’t mind to have this discussed in public.
> 
There's only very limited time on Monday, and we tend to discuss
delicate matters in private first. Proposal: let's see where we are
after the call, then we can decide within the board how & where to
proceed. Ok?

Cheers,

-- Thorsten


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature