Re: [boost] Re: Signals and multi_array? [was: Problem compilingboost.filesystem]

[Douglas Gregor]

 Douglas Paul Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Doesn't look like there has been any activity on signals and
multi_array.
  Are the developers aware of the need for action?
 
  I'll try to work on Signals tonight.

 Hint: turn the body of your policies class into the body of your
 iterator.

'tis done, and it was _very_ easy, and the result is as clean as is
conceivable. Nice job!

Doug

___
Unsubscribe  other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost

[boost] Re: Signals and multi_array? [was: Problem compilingboost.filesystem]

[David Abrahams]

Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 At 09:50 PM 7/13/2003, David Abrahams wrote:

  Matthias Troyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
   ... I hope that multi_array will also be fixed soon

  Somebody has to make that fix, whatever it is.  multi_array used to
  use its own private version of iterator_adaptors.

 Doesn't look like there has been any activity on signals and
 multi_array. Are the developers aware of the need for action?

multi_array is fixed.

Doug, let me know if you need help with signals.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
www.boost-consulting.com

___
Unsubscribe  other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost