David Abrahams wrote: > ...although now the only expected failure tests we have left are > compile-fail. So I don't know what to do with the others.
Could we introduce a third result. Pass and fail we know, 'error' would the test could not actually be run. This would reflect a compile fail for link/runtime tests, missing/corrupt files for compile tests (perhaps due to CVS corruption) and probably a couple more corner cases I haven't thought about yet. -- AlisdairM Team Thai Kingdom _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
