Re: [boost] MPL::void_t

2003-02-03 Thread Joel de Guzman
- Original Message - 
From: "Aleksey Gurtovoy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


> Joel de Guzman wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi Joel,
> 
> > Question why is mpl::void_t an incomplete type? 
> 
> I suppose we are talking about 'mpl::void_'. Since we have a use case for it
> now, just go ahead and make it complete! (A short comment would be nice, too
> :).

Thanks! Done:

//  [JDG Feb-4-2003] made void_ a complete type to allow it to be
//  instantiated so that it can be passed in as an object that can be
//  used to select an overloaded function. Possible use includes signaling
//  a zero arity functor evaluation call.
struct void_ {};

Joel de Guzman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.boost-consulting.com


___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost



RE: [boost] MPL::void_t

2003-01-24 Thread Aleksey Gurtovoy
Joel de Guzman wrote:
> Hi,

Hi Joel,

> Question why is mpl::void_t an incomplete type? 

I suppose we are talking about 'mpl::void_'. Since we have a use case for it
now, just go ahead and make it complete! (A short comment would be nice, too
:).

Aleksey
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost