Re: [boost] Re: RC_1_30_2 tagged for release
Martin Wille wrote: David Abrahams wrote: Martin Wille writes: The fix made to the gcc toolset regarding the use of the GXX variable should be backported to 1_30_2. Please be more specific, i.e. post a patchset. If I had a patchset then I would have applied it :) (I sent a bug report some time ago to the JamBoost list. Rene fixed the issue immediately) I was talking about the difference between 1.70 and 1.69 of gcc-tools.jam. I don't know wether other changes to that file should also be applied to 1_30_2. Regards, m ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Re: RC_1_30_2 tagged for release
David Abrahams wrote: Martin Wille writes: David Abrahams wrote: It appears that the tagging step for Version_1_30_1 got messed up somehow. Please have a look at RC_1_30_2, which is our release candidate for Version 1_30_2, and let me know if there are any problems. I'm not able to run the Linux regression tests on that branch. process_jam_log fails due to an out_of_range being thrown from basic_string::substr. Probably, some files are still missing for the tests to work properly. It's hard to see how that's possible, but it is ... Fixed the problem. That was also the cause of the problem with RC_1_30_1. Thanks for sorting this out! Please try again, everybody. The fix made to the gcc toolset regarding the use of the GXX variable should be backported to 1_30_2. Currently most of the tests fail when I use the toolsets of 1_30_2, since my setup uses the GXX variable. Regards, m ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Re: [boost] Re: RC_1_30_2 tagged for release
David Abrahams wrote: Martin Wille writes: The fix made to the gcc toolset regarding the use of the GXX variable should be backported to 1_30_2. Please be more specific, i.e. post a patchset. If I had a patchset then I would have applied it :) (I sent a bug report some time ago to the JamBoost list. Rene fixed the issue immediately) I'll look into this on sunday. Regards, m ___ Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
