Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-25 Thread Beman Dawes
At 04:28 PM 1/24/2003, Peter Dimov wrote:

>From: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> I've run the Win32 tests again, so you can see the new results.
>
>One thing that I notice is that tests that are no longer in the Jamfile 
are
>kept in the table; for example, enable_shared_from_this_test.cpp is still
>there, even though I've renamed it (the name was >31 chars.) The
>bind/mem_fn tests are listed twice, too - I've moved them to a test
>subdirectory with a subincluded Jamfile.

Fixed.

What happens is that until the original bin sub-directories are deleted, 
the test keeps getting reported.

Because it takes a lot longer (like two hours longer) to run from scratch, 
I don't delete the targets and totally rebuild unless there is some 
specific reason to do so.

I can always just delete sub-directories, but only if I notice the test has 
a problem.

--Beman


___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-24 Thread Peter Dimov
From: "Beman Dawes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> I've run the Win32 tests again, so you can see the new results.

One thing that I notice is that tests that are no longer in the Jamfile are
kept in the table; for example, enable_shared_from_this_test.cpp is still
there, even though I've renamed it (the name was >31 chars.) The bind/mem_fn
tests are listed twice, too - I've moved them to a test subdirectory with a
subincluded Jamfile.

___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost



Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-24 Thread Beman Dawes
At 10:46 AM 1/24/2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:

>I've finally updated my Cygwin installation, so I was able to run bjam 
with
>gcc and experiment with the optional's Jamfile.
>
>The just committed Optional's test suite now includes failure cases.

I've run the Win32 tests again, so you can see the new results.

--Beman


___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-22 Thread Beman Dawes
At 01:56 PM 1/22/2003, Douglas Paul Gregor wrote:

>On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
>> So, what else should I do? Is there something I need to setup in order 
to
>> add optional to the regression tests?
>
>You'll probably want to create a testing Jamfile
>libs/optional/test/Jamfile. The easy way to do that is to cut 'n' paste
>from, e.g., libs/filesystem/test/Jamfile and make the obvious changes.
>Then, add "subinclude libs/optional/test/Jamfile ;" to status/Jamfile and
>the Optional tests should start showing up with the next round of
>regression testing.

Yes, but please test your lib specific Jamfile first, before changing the 
status/Jamfile.

Developers should always make sure the local Jamfile works before 
subincluding it in the main Boost Jamfile.

See the recently updated docs in more/regression.html

--Beman


___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost


Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-22 Thread Douglas Paul Gregor
On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Fernando Cacciola wrote:
> So, what else should I do? Is there something I need to setup in order to
> add optional to the regression tests?

You'll probably want to create a testing Jamfile
libs/optional/test/Jamfile. The easy way to do that is to cut 'n' paste
from, e.g., libs/filesystem/test/Jamfile and make the obvious changes.
Then, add "subinclude libs/optional/test/Jamfile ;" to status/Jamfile and
the Optional tests should start showing up with the next round of
regression testing.

Doug

___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost



Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-21 Thread David Abrahams
"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> [Just got here at home from the office... sorry for the delay]
>
> "William E. Kempf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió en el mensaje
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
>>
>> Fernando Cacciola said:
>>
>> > Here's a description of my configuration and attempts
>> > in case someone can help me (hint hint...)
>> >
>> > - Windows98
>> > - cvs95.exe version: 1.11.4
>> > - WinCVS.exe version: 1.3.8.1 Beta 8 Build 1
>> > - PuTTY 0.53b
>> >
>> > * I have checked out boost this morning on a local working
>> > directory using pserver (user) access.
>> >
>> > * I have generated and uploaded SSH2 Authentification keys.
>>
>> It can take several hours for these to take effect.
>>
> Yes I know...
> during the day, I recieved the message "Server didn't accept our key" after
> I logged in,
> but much latter it stopped, so I figured that the keys were finally uploaded
> at SF.
> But the strange thing is that it kept asking me for a password :-0

Ehm, if your ssh is not in fact doing protocol 2, it's going to ask
you for a password forever until you upload SSH1 authentication keys.

ssh -v 

is incredibly helpful for tracking down authentication issues like
this one because you can see all the transactions going back and
forth.

-- 
   David Abrahams
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost



Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-21 Thread David Abrahams
"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> (For example, the SF docs mention: "cvs.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/boost",
> while the boost site docs says: "cvs.boost.sourceforge.net:/cvsroot/boost")

The latter is correct.


-- 
   David Abrahams
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost



Re: [boost] Re: Review results: Optional library

2003-01-21 Thread David Abrahams
"Fernando Cacciola" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> According to the docs I've read so far, plink.exe/putty.exe
> is windows equivalent to unix 'ssh'.

I use my cygwin ssh on windows.  It's called "ssh.exe".
You also got an ssh.exe with WinCVS which should work.

> The doc for :ext: says that I need an 'ssh' program to handle the
> authentication.
> It says that I can use: "set CVS_RHS=/xxx/plink.exe"  (or putty.exe);
> or invoke them directly as a pipe righrt before 'cvs'
>
> If I run cvs directly as:
>
> cvs -d:ext:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/boost -z3 add
> optional.hpp
>
> It outputs:
>
> CVS.EXE [add aborted]: cannot start server via rsh: No such file or
> directory

I just set CVS_RSH=ssh and go from there.

-- 
   David Abrahams
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] * http://www.boost-consulting.com
Boost support, enhancements, training, and commercial distribution

___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost