Re: [Boston.pm] OT: O'Reilly

2005-03-02 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Hey Ben,

 How do you feel when you have a nice process in place through
 which people are supposed to contact you, and customers keep on
 persisting in trying to get direct numbers to inside contacts?  I tend
 to get irritated by that, but YMMV.  Maybe a random editor will be
 like me, maybe not.


 I am not trying to go *around* the process, I am just trying to get some 
advice from someone more in the know than myself, and someone on the inside is 
ideal to answer two or three stoopid questions before I send things in through 
the appropriate official channels.

 I as asking because, yeah, I can also figure that chromatic and Rael are 
editors there, but I am, indeed, concerned about bugging them out of the blue. 
Enough said.

 You must have missed Brian's talk of 'bribing' two weeks ago -- I am not going 
that far (yet!) =)

 -Federico

PS: given how friendly the ppl at Pearson/AW seem to be, O'Reilly must really 
be under a deluge of proposals like Uri noted!

_
-- 'Problem' is a bleak word for challenge - Richard Fish

Muad'Dib of Caladan (Federico L. Lucifredi)- Harvard University  BU
http://metcs.bu.edu/~lucifred



___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm


Re: [Boston.pm] OT: O'Reilly

2005-03-02 Thread Ben Tilly
On Thu, 03 Mar 2005 00:50:34 +, Federico Lucifredi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hey Ben,
 
  How do you feel when you have a nice process in place through
  which people are supposed to contact you, and customers keep on
  persisting in trying to get direct numbers to inside contacts?  I tend
  to get irritated by that, but YMMV.  Maybe a random editor will be
  like me, maybe not.
 
 
  I am not trying to go *around* the process, I am just trying to get
 some advice from someone more in the know than myself, and
 someone on the inside is ideal to answer two or three stoopid
 questions before I send things in through the appropriate official
 channels.

Well from O'Reilly's point of view you certainly are going around
the process, they have somewhere that they want you to start
with to reach them, and you want to go contact an insider instead.
I have no idea how specifical employees there will feel about it
though.

  I as asking because, yeah, I can also figure that chromatic and
 Rael are editors there, but I am, indeed, concerned about
 bugging them out of the blue. Enough said.

You might try contacting any O'Reilly author instead to get
feedback/a better idea who might be sympathetic.

  You must have missed Brian's talk of 'bribing' two weeks ago --
 I am not going that far (yet!) =)

I definitely did miss that talk.  Remember, I'm only possibly
going to move to Boston, right now I'm in Santa Monica.

 PS: given how friendly the ppl at Pearson/AW seem to be,
 O'Reilly must really be under a deluge of proposals like Uri
 noted!

Well, they certainly are popular.  (Authors know that any
given title is likely to sell a lot better if it is published by
O'Reilly than it will when published by someone else.)

Cheers,
Ben
 
___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm


Re: [Boston.pm] Anyone know of an alternative to perldoc.com?

2005-03-02 Thread Chris Devers
On Thu, 3 Mar 2005, Grant M. wrote:

 Does anyone know of an alternative to the package listing for perl 
 versions that used to be on perldoc.com?

When this came up on the beginners list, someone suggested perlpod.com. 

I hadn't heard of it before, but it looks a lot like perldoc.com did...


-- 
Chris Devers
 
___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm