[Boston.pm] The second P

2012-01-26 Thread Federico Lucifredi
Okay guys,
  I haven't gotten a definite answer on this when I asked a couple of years 
back, so I'l ask again - flog me as you may :)

  I have a need to properly learn a certain other P language, and I do not 
mean PHP either.  For Perl, my favorite concise summary is the first chapter 
of Damian's OO Perl book.  What about the other, unnamed, language? Guido has 
written up a short language on the book, but what else has proven popular with 
people who already knew Perl to expand their range of dynamic languages - 
without reading hundred of pages?

 Thanks -Federico

PS: I promise to flog myself if you guys actually come up with a good 
suggestion!

_
-- 'Problem' is a bleak word for challenge - Richard Fish
(Federico L. Lucifredi) - flucifredi at acm.org - GnuPG 0x4A73884C








___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm


Re: [Boston.pm] The second P

2012-01-26 Thread Gyepi SAM

I have found the hard way (of going through the documentation) to be quite
effective.

First, I read the tutorial, then skimmed the language reference, then I jumped 
into the library reference with the
occasional return to the language reference when I needed to convince myself
that python's syntax did not allow for whatever construct I had my heart set
on.

It's a bit slow initially but the language is simple enough that the pace picks 
up
pretty quickly.

Regards

-Gyepi

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 08:12:45PM -0500, Federico Lucifredi wrote:
 Okay guys,
   I haven't gotten a definite answer on this when I asked a couple of years 
 back, so I'l ask again - flog me as you may :)
 
   I have a need to properly learn a certain other P language, and I do not 
 mean PHP either.  For Perl, my favorite concise summary is the first 
 chapter of Damian's OO Perl book.  What about the other, unnamed, language? 
 Guido has written up a short language on the book, but what else has proven 
 popular with people who already knew Perl to expand their range of dynamic 
 languages - without reading hundred of pages?
 
  Thanks -Federico
 
 PS: I promise to flog myself if you guys actually come up with a good 
 suggestion!
 
 _
 -- 'Problem' is a bleak word for challenge - Richard Fish
 (Federico L. Lucifredi) - flucifredi at acm.org - GnuPG 0x4A73884C

___
Boston-pm mailing list
Boston-pm@mail.pm.org
http://mail.pm.org/mailman/listinfo/boston-pm