Re: [botnets] New Botnet or what

2006-10-11 Thread John Holan
To report a botnet PRIVATELY please email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Symantec was my first one to try on the file, I run it through several at 
www.virustotal.com where I also left the file for distribution.
Symantec has still not included it in its AV definitions, even it is more than 
24 hours since I send it to them.
McAfee has the file listed since 5-23-06, so it is the same old story that the 
more secure the systems have become the fewer report to the AV vendors.
I think they need to get I little more aggressive themselves in using honeypots 
and so on.


John

IS Analyst

-Original Message-
From: Thomas Raef [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 09, 2006 4:06 AM
To: John Holan; botnets@whitestar.linuxbox.org
Subject: Re: [botnets] New Botnet or what

 


From: John Holan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu 10/5/2006 3:43 PM
To: botnets@whitestar.linuxbox.org
Subject: [botnets] New Botnet or what
To report a botnet PRIVATELY please email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hi
Killed a Trojan on a workstation that was constantly connecting to
66.197.216.149 on port 80
It uses filenames associated with Backdoor.Haxdoor but they are not
detected by any AV or Anti Spy ware software that I have tried.
Unfortunately I did not trap any of the traffic it generated only the
logs. And I am still analyzing them.
Any suggestions.

More info

192.168.10.119 Accessed URL
66.197.216.149:/Ffgj3dsw/bsrv.php?lang=ENUpal=0bay=0gold=0id=pa
ram=16661socksport=20454httpport=21219uptimem=51uptimeh=62uid=[5278
947655522557439]wm=0ver=88(A)
--
66.197.216.149/Ffgj3dsw/bsrv.php?
lang=ENU
pal=0
bay=0
gold=0
id=
param=16661
socksport=20454
httpport=21219
uptimem=51
uptimeh=62
uid=[5278947655522557439]
wm=0
ver=88(A)
-

John
IS Analyst
What AV did you test with? Just curious.
Thank you.
___
To report a botnet PRIVATELY please email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All list and server information are public and available to law enforcement 
upon request.
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets


[botnets] Botnet article question

2006-10-11 Thread D'Aloisio, Marc
To report a botnet PRIVATELY please email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
In the article Beware the Bots
(http://www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=193105
252 ), the State of Connecticut is labeled 'bot infested'.  Has anyone
on this list seen any information to substantiate this claim by
Information Week? (Our ASNs are 3481 and 22742) (who apparently got
their info from Trend Micro).  Or data (internal monitoring, external
reports/complaints, etc.) definitely does not substantiate this claim.
Nor does the information I get from this and other lists.  I would be
interested in hearing your views.  I realize they may be going for the
sensationalized story.

Marc D'Aloisio, CISSP 
Security Analyst; Security Incident Response and Investigation
State of Connecticut - Department of Information Technology 

___
To report a botnet PRIVATELY please email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All list and server information are public and available to law enforcement 
upon request.
http://www.whitestar.linuxbox.org/mailman/listinfo/botnets