Re: Look Who's Back / Mike's crazy list of physics hypotheses that he wishes he had time to look into but doesn't have the time.

2010-10-23 Thread Max Battcher

On 10/22/2010 10:35 PM, Michael Harney wrote:

I'm back again. I don't really know that I am doing any better than I
was when I left, but I will see. I wanted to discuss some concepts with
intelligent people (some of whom may already know about some of this
stuff). I will preface these that my knowledge of Quantum theory is
small, and if anyone can recommend a good (emphasis on good, not overly
simplified or popularized like Hawking's Books which read more like
"quantum physics for dummies" I want nitty-gritty details) book on
quantum theory, I would appreciate it.


Have you tried Michio Kaku's or Brian Greene's books? In my experience 
they are both wonderfully accessible writers with very firm grasps in 
the details of quantum and string/M theories. I've certainly enjoyed 
what I've read from both writers. (They are also both humble, working 
theoreticians.)


--
--Max Battcher--
http://worldmaker.net

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Look Who's Back / Mike's crazy list of physics hypotheses that he wishes he had time to look into but doesn't have the time.

2010-10-23 Thread Michael Harney
I'm back again.  I don't really know that I am doing any better than I 
was when I left, but I will see.  I wanted to discuss some concepts with 
intelligent people (some of whom may already know about some of this 
stuff).  I will preface these that my knowledge of Quantum theory is 
small, and if anyone can recommend a good (emphasis on good, not overly 
simplified or popularized like Hawking's Books which read more like 
"quantum physics for dummies" I want nitty-gritty details) book on 
quantum theory, I would appreciate it.


Mike's Crazy Hypothesis 1:
I have heard hypothesized that neutrons are simply protons upon-which an 
electron has collapsed.  First, does this make sense by our current 
understanding of quantum theory?  If the hypothesis does make sense, 
what if the hypothesis is backwards?  What if Neutrons are the "natural 
state" of matter and protons are neutrons that had part of them stripped 
away (likely during the big-bang)?  This could explain why electrons are 
near mass-less and the incredibly strong force of attraction between 
protons and electrons.


Mike's Crazy Hypothesis 2:
I am half-way through reading Richard Dawkin's book "The God Delusion".  
In it he says that proponents of a creator argue that the fundamental 
force constants in the universe are so finely tuned so as to allow the 
conditions that make life (as we know it) possible.  and that if even 
one of these, like the strong force, was slightly different, that life 
would not be possible because if the strong force were higher, all 
hydrogen in the universe would have fused into heavier stuff, and if it 
were weaker, no heavier atoms essential to the formation of our planet 
and the life on it could be created in the cores of massive stars.  He 
explains Multi-dimensional theory and it as a possible explanation that 
would explain why a universe that has the right constants can exist 
without a creator.  Multi-dim theory aside, a thought occurred to me: If 
the constants of our universe need to be at a specific range for matter 
to exist in the forms that promote life, what if the constants like the 
"strong force" are not constants?  What if, over billions of years (or 
even longer), the strong force slowly got weaker.  Indeed, a higher 
strong force would go a long way to explain the singularity that 
resulted in the big bang, and the weakening of the strong force would go 
a long way to explaining why the big bang occurred in the first place.  
It might also go a long way to explain why Galaxies and solar-systems 
don't seem to follow the same model of gravity.  If the fundamental 
constants of the universe are changing ever-so-slowly, Objects at a 
great distance would appear to be affected differently than objects 
closer together simply because of the time it took for the bodies to 
form with relation to each other and the changing of the fundamental 
forces.  This may also explain the recent data suggesting that the 
universe appears to be expanding at an ever increasing rate rather than 
slowing down as one would expect.


I have more crazy hypotheses, but I am getting tired, so I think that I 
will stop there for now.


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Crazy Cat Lady

2007-04-04 Thread Julia Thompson
Deborah Harrell wrote:
>> Gary Nunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>   
>> I LOVE this
>> http://www.stupid.com/stat/CCLF.html
> 
> Only _six_!?  I thought it had to be in double digits
> to qualify as mentally splintered...   ;)

I'd say it depends on the size of the abode.

8 cats in a 2-story house may be excessive, but not crazy.  8 cats in an 
efficiency apartment is another story entirely.

> Debbi
> Whaddaya Mean Letting A Cat Sleep On Yer Face
> Qualifies?! Maru

Um, I didn't think it did, otherwise some of my friends that I had 
pegged as "mostly sane" are in trouble  (And it's not so much a 
matter of "letting" as "the dang cat is going to do what it's going to 
do, and as long as I can breathe, it's not a problem".)

Julia



___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: Crazy Cat Lady

2007-04-02 Thread Deborah Harrell
> Gary Nunn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
> I LOVE this
> http://www.stupid.com/stat/CCLF.html

Only _six_!?  I thought it had to be in double digits
to qualify as mentally splintered...   ;)

Debbi
Whaddaya Mean Letting A Cat Sleep On Yer Face
Qualifies?! Maru


 

Sucker-punch spam with award-winning protection. 
Try the free Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/features_spam.html
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Crazy Cat Lady

2007-03-30 Thread Gary Nunn
 
I LOVE this
 
http://www.stupid.com/stat/CCLF.html
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Those crazy Apple people (was Re: unholy OS wars )

2006-09-04 Thread Nick Arnett

On 9/4/06, Richard Baker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


 The 5150s in the Mac Pro



Hmm... the Mac Pro's processors are called 5150s, eh?  Pretty funny
considering what 5150 means to anyone in law enforcement, emergency medical
services, etc., here in California.  It is the statute for a 72-hour
involuntary psychiatric hold, as in "Respond to a possible 5150 at..."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/5150_(Involuntary_psychiatric_hold)

Nick


--
Nick Arnett
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Messages: 408-904-7198
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Crazy ideas that work..

2006-01-02 Thread Gary Nunn


I read about this in a couple of places over the last week. The short of it
is, this guy decided to sell space on a webpage for $1 a pixel.  So far, he
is 1000 short of his million dollar/pixel goal.

I never cease to be amazed at the crazy money making schemes that pay off
big.

The FAQ is interesting.

Even the rip-off, copy cats are making money. (do a search on Million Dollar
Homepage on Google)

 
http://www.milliondollarhomepage.com/
 


__
Never let the fear of striking out
keep you from playing the game.
 
 
www.BansheeDomains.com
 
 

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Strange Lights Imaged, Astronauts Not Crazy

2003-12-11 Thread Robert Seeberger
http://www.space.com/scienceastronomy/solar_aurora_031210.html

The first direct images ever made of a solar storm as it engulfs Earth have
also vindicated astronauts who said they'd seen colorful sky lights at
dubiously high altitudes.

The study shows that auroras reach far higher into the atmosphere than
expected, though scientists are still puzzled over how it is possible. The
research, which detected solar electrons approaching Earth's protective
magnetic field, will also help space weather forecasters better predict how
a tempest from the Sun might effect satellites and communication systems.

Auroras are atmospheric light displays generated by space weather. They are
born above Earth's polar regions and are routinely enjoyed from the surface
by people at far northern or southern latitudes. Auroras typically occur at
about 60 miles up (100 kilometers), when charged storm particles tickle air
molecules.



Sanity check

Scientists had a hard time believing astronauts who said they'd seen aurora
that appeared to soar higher than the International Space Station, which
orbits about 250 miles (400 kilometers) above the surface of the planet.
Experts didn't figure there were enough molecules up there to do the trick.

But now the fleeting, ultra-high events have been imaged at more than 500
miles (800 kilometers) above the planet with a new Air Force satellite
called the Solar Mass Ejection Imager.

"It's a mystery," Bernard Jackson, a solar physicist at the University of
California, San Diego, said of the soaring auroras. "This is far higher than
anyone had ever expected. It may be that nitrogen from the ionosphere is
ejected into the higher altitudes during a coronal mass ejection."

A coronal mass ejection (CME) is a cloud of hot gas sometimes shot from the
Sun during a solar flare. CMEs expand as they head through space. Upon
reaching Earth anywhere from 18 hours to several days later, they fuel
aurora and sometimes knock out satellites and threaten power grids on the
surface.

Better view

Until recently, space storm forecasters had to rely on images of CMEs taken
by NASA's SOHO spacecraft. But it sits about 1 million miles (1.5 million
kilometers) from Earth and only sees a small region of the sky directly
surrounding the Sun.

The new observations, made with a new satellite that orbits Earth about 500
miles high, recorded several recent CMEs as they enveloped the planet's
magnetic field, Jackson told SPACE.com. The field emanates from the planet's
poles, extends beyond the atmosphere, and protectively absorbs much of the
shock of space storms.

The findings were announced Wednesday at a meeting of the American
Geophysical Union.

Astronauts who've witnessed high-altitude auroras must now feel like airline
pilots, who for years had said they saw lightning shooting from the tops of
thunderstorms, teasing with the boundary of space. Scientists once thought
those claims incredulous, too, until they photographed the high-altitude
discharges, which are now called blue jets and red sprites.

The near-space auroral displays are unrelated to jets and sprites.

For scientists the more interesting aspect of the new study was the newfound
ability to image CMEs as they pass Earth, a stormy process that can last 24
hours or more.

"We are living inside the solar atmosphere, but up until now had no way to
view it, so space forecasters couldn’t be certain whether an ejection from
the Sun would affect the Earth one to five days later or harmlessly pass us
by," Jackson said. "Now that we can see these clouds as they travel through
space outward from the Sun, we can map their trajectories."

The Solar Mass Ejection Imager was launched in January by the Air Force. It
sees a CME by recording a faint scattering of sunlight caused by electrons
in the onrushing cloud. A video of the observations is available here.

High stakes

Solar activity in late October and early November knocked out satellites,
caused airlines to divert flights to avoid potentially dangerous polar
routes, mucked with the electronics of some spacecraft and ruined an
instrument aboard the Mars Odyssey probe.

Solar storms even played a role in the loss of Japan's Mars mission, a craft
called Nozomi, the country's space agency said Tuesday.

Meanwhile, scientists are working to better understand why some solar
onslaughts cause more problems than others.

A separate recent study showed that under certain conditions a CME can rip
open a hole in Earth's magnetosphere, allowing its full force to penetrate
the otherwise protective shield.



xponent

Blink Maru

rob


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Crazy

2003-11-26 Thread William T Goodall
http://www.newscientist.com/news/news.jsp?id=ns4425

"Cash dispensing ATMs belonging to two US financial institutions were 
shut down when the computer worm Welchia invaded their embedded Windows 
XP operating systems in August. Diebold, the Ohio-based company that 
makes the machines, revealed the security breach on Tuesday.

...

David Loomstein, of Symantec's computer security response team in Santa 
Monica, California, agrees: "Are they running a popular operating 
system? Are they sitting on the internet or a network? If yes, then 
there is always the possibility of access."

Devices meeting Loomstein's criteria also include cell phones that 
connect to the internet and SCADA systems that control utilities. All 
are increasingly relying on popular software, such as embedded Windows 
XP, that virus writers target."

Using Windo$e to run anything more important than games is crazy.

--
William T Goodall
Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web  : http://www.wtgab.demon.co.uk
Blog : http://radio.weblogs.com/0111221/
"Mac OS X is a rock-solid system that's beautifully designed. I much 
prefer it to Linux." - Bill Joy.

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l