Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Nick Arnett]

On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:13 AM, Ticia  wrote:

>
>
>
> Nick I'm not getting all Brin-L messages?! I never got the thread below
> (Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!),  checkend my spambox but they're not
> there!
>
> That's just weird.  Could you check the archive page now and then and let
me know if there seems to be any pattern to what's not arriving?

Nick
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Ticia]

On 19 Sep 2011, at 01:37, Nick Arnett wrote:

> Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this.  Shouldn't happen.  I'll 
> figure it out and stop it.
> 
> Nick
> 
> On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ronn! Blankenship 
>  wrote:
> Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?) 
> receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do 
> something about it?
> 
> TIA!
> 
> 
> 
> (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help to 
> anyone . . . )
> 
> <>


Nick I'm not getting all Brin-L messages?! I never got the thread below (Re: 
Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!),  checkend my spambox but they're not there! 



> 
> At 01:17 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Matt Grimaldi wrote:
> Ticia wrote:
> 
> > B-Society: proposing an alternative to the 9-5 society,
> > taking into account the needs of the 25% of us who are
> > evening types (night owls).
> 
> That sounds good!  If there was a chapter in L.A., I would want to join!
> 
> -- Matt
> 
> 
> 
> They meet at Joe's sushi bar downtown starting at 8:00 AM.
> 
> 
> . . . ronn!  :)
> 
> "Sunrise is Nature's way of telling you it's bedtime."
> 


  I know there'd be kindred spirits on here!  There's some preliminary 
reseach linking creativity and high IQ with eveningness (though I personally 
know some exceptions to that so it's not conditional or anything ;)) 

Ticia ',:)


___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Nick Arnett]

Okay, I removed the problem address... shouldn't happen any more.

Nick
___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Doug Pensinger]

Me neither.

Hi Ticia, good to hear from you.

Doug

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Matt Grimaldi  wrote:
> I DON'T get such messages when sending on the list.
> -- Matt
>
>
> ___
> http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
>
>
>

___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Matt Grimaldi]

I DON'T get such messages when sending on the list.

-- Matt___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

RE: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Pat Mathews]

Well, I got it, and since I didn't see my Reply message to the list pop up, I 
figured there was smeting wrong and it wouldn;t take my reply.


http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/





> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:00:42 -0500
> To: brin-l@mccmedia.com
> From: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net
> Subject: Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re:       
> Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!
> 
> At 06:37 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Nick Arnett wrote:
> >Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this.
> 
> 
> Yep.  I get it every time I send a message to the list, and it sounds 
> like everybody else does, too . . .
> 
> 
> >   Shouldn't happen.  I'll figure it out and stop it.
> 
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> 
> . . . ronn!  :)
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
> 
  ___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Ronn! Blankenship]

At 06:37 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Nick Arnett wrote:

Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this.



Yep.  I get it every time I send a message to the list, and it sounds 
like everybody else does, too . . .




  Shouldn't happen.  I'll figure it out and stop it.



Thanks!


. . . ronn!  :)



___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com

Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Nick Arnett]

Ugh - I didn't realize everybody was getting this.  Shouldn't happen.  I'll
figure it out and stop it.

Nick

On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Ronn! Blankenship <
ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net> wrote:

> Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole list?)
> receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the list, and can do
> something about it?
>
> TIA!
>
>
>
> (Quoting it in its entirety with full headers in case that info is of help
> to anyone . . . )
>
>
> At 01:50 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, postmas...@cenit.de wrote:
>
>> X-Apparently-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net via 67.195.15.74; Sun, 18
>> Sep 2011 11:50:22 -0700
>> Received-SPF: none (domain of fgateway09.isp.att.net does not designate
>> permitted sender hosts)
>> X-YMailISG: RzwF44oWLDu8LZBgzXsfOTA5LUtnda**FOMzyYUK3vJhsZ3THi
>>  Xs2ICe3wr8v2Rb1eEvRHKhbirhpihi**KzA3SxZ5r8sG.T7W2fB0z8N_vcUQLa
>>  bX9j8PKcUlzUiZCa_**YPoAZeWZu3To9B6T23_oJJs.9j0.**56BfJILojsBKBI2
>>  pH2Q1wkGnmuVkhtZFg_as_**f7QUTIsUsnmQQCHzxFrH5ARd_nZ._**FJVDo85xK
>>  5AWKZ4DlOTvNR9uz94k1EgjZFrcLYN**4796s1UKBoujqt6XNI.gRth_CNVtFw
>>  s7SdPMkYq_**8lBRJwbSZ1LZrn7DNPVvZxcojIipWu**th5zsJaP1ipt2LnSRUN3
>>  EgsjmyMeEd6HmKXWvNuuZXxlMHzSZ2**F5FjO2JytKGw72QSVGPdQ1F.CjfDOt
>>  AV793n5CvHDlk6qmzeNthNTBbzkwbo**iE23GOlRt2O8KpZ6cFQHEtvZuJuBtt
>>  FjCcAvWYzONx1MWxtPEKwricOz7Qwg**hdC2a2qAAkAAV5.g--
>> X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4]
>> Authentication-Results: mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com  from=cenit.de;
>> domainkeys=neutral (no sig);  from=cenit.de; dkim=neutral (no sig)
>> Received: from 207.115.11.39  (EHLO fgateway09.isp.att.net)
>> (207.115.11.39)
>>  by mta1030.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 11:50:20
>> -0700
>> Received: from cenit.de (ns2.cenit.de[193.188.158.4])
>>  by isp.att.net (frfwmxc09) with ESMTP
>>  id <20110918185019M0900jhlfke>; Sun, 18 Sep 2011 18:50:19 +
>> X-Originating-IP: [193.188.158.4]
>> Received: from 
>> mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.**com([10.0.2.156])
>>by ns2.cenit.de (cenit.de [192.168.232.3])
>>(MDaemon PRO v9.6.3)
>>with ESMTP id md50003484517.msg
>>for 
>> >;
>> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200
>> Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by 
>> mailgateway02.de.cenit-group.**com(8.13.8/8.13.8)
>>id p8IIo9BI023663 for 
>> >;
>> Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200
>> From: postmas...@cenit.de
>> To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net
>> Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200
>> MIME-Version: 1.0
>> X-DSNContext: 335a7efd - 4523 - 0001 - 80040546
>> Message-ID: 
>> 
>> >
>> Subject: Delivery Status Notification (Failure)
>> Content-Type: multipart/report; report-type=delivery-status;
>>boundary="9B095B5ADSN=_**01CC68D12B729BBE1B70exf?**
>> de02.de.ceni"
>> VBR-Info: md=cenit.de; mc=all; mv=vbr.emailcertification.org;
>> X-Spam-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:55 +0200
>>(not processed: message from trusted or authenticated source)
>> X-MDRemoteIP: 10.0.2.156
>> X-Return-Path:
>> X-Envelope-From:
>> X-MDaemon-Deliver-To: ronn_blankens...@bellsouth.net
>> X-MDAV-Processed: cenit.de, Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:45:57 +0200
>>
>> This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
>>
>> Delivery to the following recipients failed.
>>
>>   a.freib...@cenit.de
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Reporting-MTA: 
>> dns;exf-de02.de.cenit-group.**com
>> Received-From-MTA: 
>> dns;mailgateway01.de.cenit-**group.com
>> Arrival-Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200
>>
>> Final-Recipient: rfc822;a.freib...@cenit.de
>> Action: failed
>> Status: 5.1.1
>>
>> Received: from 
>> mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.**com([10.0.2.155])
>>  by
>> exf-de02.de.cenit-group.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
>>Sun, 18 Sep 2011 20:50:09 +0200
>> Received: (from smtpd@127.0.0.1) by 
>> mailgateway01.de.cenit-group.**com(8.13.8/8.13.8)
>>id p8IIo8e0008854 for ; Sun, 18 Sep 2011
>> 20:50:08 +0200
>> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13)
>> X-Spam-Level:
>> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,REPTO_QUOTE_**
>> QUALCOMM
>>autolearn=unavailable version=3.1.8
>> X-Spam-Report:
>>* -4.7 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1%
>>*  [score: 0.]
>>*  0.0 REPTO_QUOTE_QUALCOMM Qualcomm/Eudora doesn't do quoting like
>> this
>> Authentication-Results: cenit.de
>>spf=pass 
>> smtp.mail=brin-l-bounces@**mccmedia.com
>> ;
>>sender-id=pass 
>> header.sender=brin-l-bounces@**mccmedia.com
>> ;
>>dkim=neutral header.d=bellsouth.net (1:-4:DKIM_SIGNATURE_BAD_BUT_*
>> *TESTING);
>> Received-SPF: pass (cenit.de: domain of brin-l-boun...@mccmedia.com
>>designates 67.222.54.6 as permitted sender)
>>x-spf-client=MDaemon.PRO.v

Re: ADMIN: Re: Delivery Status Notification (Failure), was Re: Night Owls Demand Equal Rights!

[Ronn! Blankenship]

At 04:48 PM Sunday 9/18/2011, Ronn! Blankenship wrote:
Is there anyone who knows why I and others (I presume the whole 
list?) receive this in response to EVERY message we sent to the 
list, and can do something about it?




I see Ticia also wondered the same pretty thing at much the same 
moment, and was nice enough to not try to be as "helpful" as I was . . . :(


And apparently Dan answered my question in the negative . . . :(:(

Oh, well . . .


. . . ronn!  :)



___
http://box535.bluehost.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com