Re: Passive-Agressive posting (was Re: The Role of Government in a Libertarian Free Market)

2009-08-25 Thread Matt Grimaldi
Patrick said:

> It's kind of like playing with that old Eliza computer program. Anyone
> remember that?

From: Richard Baker 
] Why do you say "anyone remember that?"?

How do you feel when you read "Why do you say "anyone remember that?"?"?

-- Matt

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Passive-Agressive posting (was Re: The Role of Government in a Libertarian Free Market)

2009-08-18 Thread Doug Pensinger
Rob wrote:
>
Bruce wrote:

>> (Type mismatch error: expected boolean value but found string 'cake'.
>> Input not parsed.)
>
> The cake is a lie?

Apparently the cake is neither true nor false.

Doug

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Passive-Agressive posting (was Re: The Role of Government in a Libertarian Free Market)

2009-08-18 Thread Rceeberger

On 8/18/2009 4:22:27 PM, Bruce Bostwick (lihan161...@sbcglobal.net) wrote:
> Yeah, Eliza and Parry could be quite entertaining if they talked to
> each other.
> 
> Eliza and Racter could be too, but Eliza
> didn't get to say much in
> those conversations ..
> 
> On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Patrick Sweeney wrote:
> 
> > It's
> kind of like playing with that old Eliza computer program. Anyone
> > remember that?
> 
> (Type mismatch error: expected boolean value but found string 'cake'.
> Input not parsed.)

The cake is a lie?


xponent
Portalizations Maru
rob

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Passive-Agressive posting (was Re: The Role of Government in a Libertarian Free Market)

2009-08-18 Thread Bruce Bostwick
Yeah, Eliza and Parry could be quite entertaining if they talked to  
each other.


Eliza and Racter could be too, but Eliza didn't get to say much in  
those conversations ..


On Aug 18, 2009, at 4:08 PM, Patrick Sweeney wrote:


It's kind of like playing with that old Eliza computer program. Anyone
remember that?


(Type mismatch error: expected boolean value but found string 'cake'.   
Input not parsed.)



___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Passive-Agressive posting (was Re: The Role of Government in a Libertarian Free Market)

2009-08-18 Thread Richard Baker

Patrick said:


It's a put-on. And it's a put-on anyone who's been on the Internet for
more than 5 minutes has seen dozens of times. The repetitive "I'm just
asking questions to try to understand," the feigned cluelessness, the
detached pose, the deliberate obtuseness ... it's all carefully
calculated to do one thing and one thing only - get the other person
to blow his top so you can disregard them as being "irrational" or
"rude."


Or else it could be the socratic method. Perhaps it's a mirror that  
shows people what they want to see.



It's kind of like playing with that old Eliza computer program. Anyone
remember that?


Why do you say "anyone remember that?"?

Rich


___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com



Re: Passive-Agressive posting (was Re: The Role of Government in a Libertarian Free Market)

2009-08-18 Thread Patrick Sweeney
It's a put-on. And it's a put-on anyone who's been on the Internet for
more than 5 minutes has seen dozens of times. The repetitive "I'm just
asking questions to try to understand," the feigned cluelessness, the
detached pose, the deliberate obtuseness ... it's all carefully
calculated to do one thing and one thing only - get the other person
to blow his top so you can disregard them as being "irrational" or
"rude."

It's kind of like playing with that old Eliza computer program. Anyone
remember that?

Patrick


On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Jim Sharkey wrote:
> Doug wrote:
>
>>Now see, I guess I dont understand what passive-aggressive means because I
>> would think that his confrontational, >sometimes sarcastic style has any
>> passivity to it.
>
> I see it differently, perhaps. "Passive-agressive" may not be the right
> clinical term here, but I find repeated statements such as "I"m just asking
> questions" and intimations of it being the other persons' faults for how
> they interpret what you're writing as a way to irritate someone and present
> a point of view without *really* presenting it. It may not be a textbook
> definition, but that's how it strikes me.
>
> I'm not saying JW does this regularly, it's just something I get exposed to
> on a lot of lists and it pushes my buttons, so it's certainly possible the
> fault lies within me. Erik used to do it to people here all the time (JVB
> was *especially* prone to rising to that particular bait(, and that was one
> of the reasons I could barely stand to read even his quality posts.
>
> Jim
> Confessionals Maru
> 
>   Click for a wide selection of quality scales.
> Scale
> Click Here For More Information
>
> ___
> http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com
>
>
>



-- 
___
Patrick Sweeney
Firefly Games | www.firefly-games.com

___
http://mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l_mccmedia.com