Re: Papers Please!

2005-11-29 Thread Dave Land

On Nov 28, 2005, at 8:35 PM, The Fool wrote:


http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/11/28/D8E5RPBO5.html

Miami police announced Monday they will stage random shows of force at
hotels, banks and other public places to keep terrorists guessing and
remind people to be vigilant.


He means afraid. You can't control people as easily if they're not
running scared. Wait... Isn't that how terrorism works?


Deputy Police Chief Frank Fernandez said officers might, for example,
surround a bank building, check the IDs of everyone going in and out
and hand out leaflets about terror threats.


Leaflets, tracts, what's the difference. I wonder if they'll go around
asking, Have you heard the word of Allah lately?


This is an in-your-face type of strategy. It's letting the terrorists
know we are out there, Fernandez said.


And letting the rest of the people know who's in charge, and it ain't
you.


The operations will keep terrorists off guard, Fernandez said. He said
al-Qaida and other terrorist groups plot attacks by putting places
under surveillance and watching for flaws and patterns in security.


The operations will keep citizens in a state of frenzy and frustration,
Land said. He said that the Republican party and other civil rights
violators plot attacks by putting places under surveillance and
watching for flaws and patterns in security.


Police Chief John Timoney said there was no specific, credible threat
of an imminent terror attack in Miami.


Though we now have specific, credible evidence of an imminent attack
on civil liberties in that fair city.

Dave

___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l


Re: papers please

2002-10-05 Thread Deborah Harrell

--- Doug wrote:

 I haven't seen or used any of the fingerprint stuff
 yet, but I can't say 
 as it would bother me a whole lot.  In fact, if it
 would protect me 
 against identity theft I would say that the benefits
 far outweigh the 
 drawbacks.  Of course maybe it's because my
 fingerprints are on file in 
 a few places already (California DMV, U.S. DoD).  It
 bothers me much 
 more that people can sell information about me
 without my knowledge - 
 especially private stuff like financial info.
 
 What's the big deal about fingerprint I.D. to those
 of you that dislike it so much?

My fingerprints are also on file (part of the medical
licensing process in several states), and I don't
object to that level of identity proof when one is in
a sensitive area (like the DoD). And I agree that the
selling of private information is a serious problem
(as I mentioned, the CO DoMV _was_ selling drivers'
license info until they were publicly 'outed').

But as I also stated, while the Jeffco sheriff's
office says that 'print info won't be used unless
fraud is involved, the example of the misuse of
information-gathering by a nearby law enforcement
agency (Denver City Police) does not engender my
confidence.  I must add that I think the vast majority
of law-enforcement folks are good people trying to do
difficult, dangerous work - but without
transparency/reciprocity, collecting sensitive
information on ordinary citizens _without evidence of
their misbehavior_ seems invasive to me.

Debbi

__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC  Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: papers please

2002-10-05 Thread Doug

Deborah Harrell wrote:


But as I also stated, while the Jeffco sheriff's
office says that 'print info won't be used unless
fraud is involved, the example of the misuse of
information-gathering by a nearby law enforcement
agency (Denver City Police) does not engender my
confidence.  I must add that I think the vast majority
of law-enforcement folks are good people trying to do
difficult, dangerous work - but without
transparency/reciprocity, collecting sensitive
information on ordinary citizens _without evidence of
their misbehavior_ seems invasive to me.

You won't hear me argue that we don't need greater transparency. 
 There's also the point DB makes in TS:  

Well financed criminals will almost certainly develop those artifices 
long seen in spy thrillers: an artificial fingertip covering, crafted by 
adroit machines to fool some of the print readers that are coming on to 
the market. (hardcover p240)

Doug

Hmmm.


___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: papers please

2002-10-03 Thread Deborah Harrell

--- The Fool wrote:
 http://www.kusa.com/storyfull.asp?id=7112
 
 Jeffco stores soon to require fingerprints for all
 check and credit card purchases
 by 9NEWS reporter Ginger Delgado, edited by Web
 Producer Paola Farer October 02, 2002 - 7:59 AM 
 
 JEFFERSON COUNTY - You'll soon have to provide a
 fingerprint to go
 shopping in Jefferson County. Consumers using checks
 or credit cards will
 have to give their prints to merchants.
snip 
 The important thing about this to remember is that
 it doesn't put an
 honest customer's fingerprint into a database
 somewhere,” said Sgt.
 George Hinkle. “The only people that are actually
 going to have their
 fingerprints processed are the crooks.

Sre...until someone decides that there might be
another use, given that the Denver Police Dept.
recently was forced to make public their files on
protest marchers (_not_ people convicted or suspected
of vandalism or anything else, just having
participated in a public demonstration).  Of course,
that may be small potatoes, since the Colorado Dept of
Motor Vehicles was selling their driver lists -
including pictures! - to various companies (that was
stopped after the story went public).
 
 The fingerprints will be kept on file until the
 transactions clear. If
 there's a problem, the prints will be passed along
 to investigators. The
 new policy will take effect throughout Jefferson
 County in the next few weeks.

Where I won't be shopping, just because, unless it's
cash.

Formerly the USA Maru


__
Do you Yahoo!?
New DSL Internet Access from SBC  Yahoo!
http://sbc.yahoo.com
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l



Re: papers please

2002-10-02 Thread Julia Thompson

The Fool wrote:
 
 http://www.kusa.com/storyfull.asp?id=7112
 
 Jeffco stores soon to require fingerprints for all check and credit card
 purchases
 by 9NEWS reporter Ginger Delgado, edited by Web Producer Paola Farer
 October 02, 2002 - 7:59 AM
 
 JEFFERSON COUNTY - You'll soon have to provide a fingerprint to go
 shopping in Jefferson County. Consumers using checks or credit cards will
 have to give their prints to merchants.

rest snipped

The annoying thing is, there was no indication of which *state* this
Jefferson County is in.  There are at least 11 states with Jefferson
Counties.  (I gave up counting at 11.  There are probably more.)

(The web page indicates it's Colorado.)

Julia
___
http://www.mccmedia.com/mailman/listinfo/brin-l