Re: [brlcad-devel] gqa + rtweight - Our First World Problem?

[Kalpit Thakkar]

Hello Daniel!

On Sat, Jun 20, 2015 at 11:40 PM, Daniel Roßberg 
wrote:

> Kalpit,
>
> Why are you using an unspecific, for command line arguments parsing
> designed API for an internal function?  Wouldn't it be better to have
> a functionality specific interface like for example
> analyze_obj_inside()?
>

Oh yes, my bad. I will have the function *analyze_volume() *(in
libanalyze's volume.c) taking the parameters : (struct ged * gedp, fastf_t
*volume, rt_db_internal *ip) -- which can be called from
*analyze_obj_insize() *using a functab, which will be there in *analyze.c*.
This function *analyze_obj_insize() *will be called from *analyze_do() *and
hence our primary aim of "analyze" being the API's customer will be served.
Am I getting this right now? :)

Actually, I thought about not passing the *struct ged* in *analyze_volume()
*but it seems that I won't be able to get a raytracing instance without the
database instance provided by the *struct ged*. If there is any way in
which I can convert an internal db structure to a database instance, there
is no need to pass the *struct ged *I guess. Everything else will remain
the same for now.

I will put the code that forms a *"raytracing context" *as a separate .c
file, and write a header or two for the functions in the final public API.
Sounds good? :)

With Regards,
Kalpit Thakkar

>
>
> 2015-06-19 19:24 GMT+02:00 Kalpit Thakkar :
> > Hello!
> >
> > I had been trying to write the implementation for volume already and
> here is
> > it's first implementation. I haven't kept API design in mind right now as
> > you can see in there, but this one is just to make sure I'm following the
> > logic correctly or not. Please have a look.
> >
> > volume implementation :
> > https://gist.github.com/dracarys-stormborn/c894daa679fb670892c8
> > A header having the structures defined :
> > https://gist.github.com/dracarys-stormborn/5f64359e90334728df70
> >
> > This is a very very naive implementation right now. But things are slowly
> > getting clearer to me and analysis on this will make it much clearer. :)
> >
> > With Regards,
> > Kalpit Thakkar
>
>
> --
> ___
> BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
> brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel
>
--
___
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel

[brlcad-devel] Regarding commit access and next week milestone

[Hitesh Sofat]

@Clifford Yapp.

Hello,

I am waiting for commit access. Please gave me the access of commit on
brlcad source code  so I will complete my editing work as soon as
possible.

The other impotent issue I want to change my next week(22 June - 29
June) milestone, next week milestone is "Convert HTML TO XML Using
Script". So I want to tell you about my approach which I used for
editing work, right now I am not using HTML for editing work so this
task no needed now. So i want  to remove this work from my proposal.
Because now methodology is changed regarding editing work now I am
used xml for editing.

According to my work I have two pending task which i want to complete first :-

1) Commit changes on main repo and after update the clone code of
brlcad as well as Wordpress with new changes using shell script and
Cron job.

2) Improve the admin interface.


So I want to complete these tasks in this week. So please allow to
change my milestone and gave me commit access so then I will Complete
these pending tasks.




-- 
Hitesh  Sofat
hiteshkumarsofat.wordpress.com

(Life is a game & winner is not defined,
Think about present because future is not defined,
unexpected things make the game interesting,
if everything goes right then game is boring )

--
___
BRL-CAD Developer mailing list
brlcad-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/brlcad-devel