bug#24877: Feature request: let TeX-error-overview show warnings, but ignore them in TeX-next-error

[Clément Pit--Claudel]

On 2016-11-07 18:18, Mosè Giordano wrote:
> Before applying it, please have a look to the patch attached.  Do you
> think it's ok?

Looks perfect.  Any reason to use `if` over `when`?

Cheers,
Clément.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

bug#24866: AucTeX not working on Emacs 25.1.1 for Mac

[Mosè Giordano]

Hi Lars,

2016-11-08 0:02 GMT+01:00 Lars Eriksson :
> Hi Mosè,
>
> I have now tested AucTeX (from git) on Emacs 25.1-1 on Mac and I am sorry to 
> say that adding load paths did not help in my case. Same error, independent 
> of load path. I have tried both without and with the addition of one and both 
> of the following load paths before loading auctex.el
> (add-to-list 'load-path 
> "/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/site-lisp")
> (add-to-list 'load-path 
> "/Applications/Emacs.app/Contents/Resources/site-lisp/auctex")
> (load "auctex.el" nil t t)
>
> From the debugger output below I have found that the error is encountered 
> when it evaluates TeX-latex-mode() in the file latex.el.

That's no surprise, since it's the only place where the function is
called ;-)  The point is that the function should be called only if
it's available, but when it's called it turns out that it's not
actually there.

If you're familiar with git, can you please run git bisect in order to
look for the offending revision?  You can use "release_11_88" as good
revision, and "release_11_89" as the bad one.

Thanks,
Mosè



___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex

bug#24877: Feature request: let TeX-error-overview show warnings, but ignore them in TeX-next-error

[Mosè Giordano]

Hi Clément,

2016-11-07 1:58 GMT+01:00 Clément Pit--Claudel :
> On 2016-11-06 18:20, Mosè Giordano wrote:
>> Hi Clément,
>
> Hi Mosè,
>
>>> […] It could say "no errors or warning to show; try
>>> customizing `…'"?
>>
>> That's a sensible suggestion, thanks.  Maybe we can conditionally
>> add that suggestion when there are warnings/bad boxes.  I can do
>> this, but not right now, probably tomorrow or in the next few days.
>> Feel free to ping me here if I miss to do it this week.
>
> Great, thanks!

Before applying it, please have a look to the patch attached.  Do you
think it's ok?

Bye,
Mosè


patch
Description: Binary data
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex