bug#29398: closed (Re: bug#29398: company-minimum-prefix-length)
Thanks a lot for the quick fix. I think the behavior is much more consistent now as it respects the user setting. I very much appreciate your readiness to change this setting even though you liked it the way it was before! Best regards Fred Am 23.11.2017 um 09:05 schrieb GNU bug Tracking System: > Your bug report > > #29398: company-minimum-prefix-length > > which was filed against the auctex package, has been closed. > > The explanation is attached below, along with your original report. > If you require more details, please reply to 29...@debbugs.gnu.org. > ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
bug#29398: company-minimum-prefix-length
Hi Tassilo, 2017-11-23 9:04 GMT+01:00 Tassilo Horn : > Hi all, > > I've removed the code. The argument that many users also use the > dabbrev company backend in combination with the native completion of the > mode made sense. In that case, you might have thousands of completions > with a too short prefix length. Great! Thanks for taking care of this. Bye, Mosè ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
bug#25002: Fail to preview latex in macOS emacs
Hi Michael, adding to what David said, we'll hopefully release a new stable version of AUCTeX, which will include the fix, by next week. Bye, Mosè 2017-11-23 9:10 GMT+01:00 Michael Heerdegen : > David Kastrup writes: > >> That's a different bug (actually several different bugs). Ghostscript >> has a history of changing its security-related behavior around, and >> every time preview-latex stops working until another patch is committed >> to AUCTeX. Ghostscript 9.22 finally removed a security related feature >> (the .runandhide operator) without working secure replacement. A fix >> has already been committed to upstream AUCTeX: this was comparatively >> straightforward to do since preview-latex had in a previous iteration >> already removed security-relevant reliance on this operator in order to >> stop this game, but it had still relied on its use elsewhere. > > Ok, it was just a shot in the dark. Thanks for explaining. > > > Michael. > > > > ___ > bug-auctex mailing list > bug-auctex@gnu.org > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex > ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
bug#25002: Fail to preview latex in macOS emacs
David Kastrup writes: > That's a different bug (actually several different bugs). Ghostscript > has a history of changing its security-related behavior around, and > every time preview-latex stops working until another patch is committed > to AUCTeX. Ghostscript 9.22 finally removed a security related feature > (the .runandhide operator) without working secure replacement. A fix > has already been committed to upstream AUCTeX: this was comparatively > straightforward to do since preview-latex had in a previous iteration > already removed security-relevant reliance on this operator in order to > stop this game, but it had still relied on its use elsewhere. Ok, it was just a shot in the dark. Thanks for explaining. Michael. ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
bug#29398: company-minimum-prefix-length
Hi all, I've removed the code. The argument that many users also use the dabbrev company backend in combination with the native completion of the mode made sense. In that case, you might have thousands of completions with a too short prefix length. Bye, Tassilo ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
