bug#65750: 12.2; LaTeX-mark-section and LaTeX-section-list
Hi Janet, > Janet Chen writes: > Dear Ikumi, > Thanks very much! >> I installed a fix in the git repo, so you won't need the workaround >> under the next AUCTeX release. >> >> I'll close this bug. I'm sorry to deliver you a bad news. In response to bug#69254[1], we decided to revert the fix of bug#65750. This is in favor of being able to turn on outline minor mode in `LaTeX-mode-hook'. See the thread of [1] for detail. Therefore, you again need the code block (add-hook 'LaTeX-mode-hook (lambda () (add-hook 'hack-local-variables-hook (lambda () (setq-local outline-regexp (LaTeX-outline-regexp t)) (setq outline-heading-alist (mapcar (lambda (x) (cons (concat "\\" (nth 0 x)) (nth 1 x))) LaTeX-section-list))) nil t))) in your init file to make `LaTeX-mark-section' recognize your customize to `LaTeX-section-list' as the file local variable after the next AUCTeX release. Sorry for inconvenience. [1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=69254 Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
bug#69254: 14.0.2; outline-hide-body doesn't work when called in LaTeX-mode-hook
Hi Arash, > Arash Esbati writes: > Ikumi Keita writes: >> Do you think that we should also revert the similar changes for >> paragraph related variables? > I'm not sure if that part is really relevant for users. I suggest we > keep that as is and touch it if we get feedback from the users. Does it > make sense? OK, then I'll install the current patch. Regards, Ikumi Keita #StandWithUkraine #StopWarInUkraine #Gaza #StopMassiveKilling #CeasefireNOW ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
bug#69254: 14.0.2; outline-hide-body doesn't work when called in LaTeX-mode-hook
Hi Keita, Ikumi Keita writes: > I see, here is a tentative patch. Thanks. > Do you think that we should also revert the similar changes for > paragraph related variables? I'm not sure if that part is really relevant for users. I suggest we keep that as is and touch it if we get feedback from the users. Does it make sense? Best, Arash ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
