Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Hi Tassilo, 2013/11/5 Tassilo Horn : > Mosè Giordano writes: > >> [...] > > Sounds good to me. Please add that explanation as a comment to the > calls. > Done, thank you. Bye, Mosè ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Mosè Giordano writes: >> `LaTeX-bibliography-list' contains both bib files, but >> `LaTeX-bibitem-list' is nil. Thus, C-c [ completes nothing (but the >> bib menu is correct). After picking one entry from that, the next >> C-c [ completes only the chosen entry. > > You have to get the parsed files associated to the the bibliography > files first (just edit and save them). Ah, that does the trick. >>> Maybe we can add a `TeX-run-style-hooks' inside >>> `TeX-arg-bibliography' and `LaTeX-arg-addbibresource', what do you >>> think? >> >> Could you elaborate what and why that would achieve? > > I suggest to add > (mapc 'TeX-run-style-hooks styles) > to the end of `TeX-arg-bibliography' (and something similar to > `LaTeX-arg-addbibresource'), just like style files of LaTeX packages > are run inside `LaTeX-arg-usepackage'. If there is already the parsed > file associated to the bibliography file, `LaTeX-bibitem-list' will be > immediately filled without the need to revert the document. And of > course we need to hope that the bibliography file has a different name > from the main document (it's not uncommon to use the same base name), > but this is a restriction intrinsic to AUCTeX, for the moment. Sounds good to me. Please add that explanation as a comment to the calls. Bye, Tassilo ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Hi Tassilo,
2013/11/4 Tassilo Horn :
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
> Hi!
>
>> actually your change does fix the problem for me, and now I can add
>> keys from both database files :-) `LaTeX-bibliography-list' has both
>> files and `LaTeX-bibitem-list' contains keys from both files. The
>> only, minor, problem is that one has to revert the buffer to fill
>> `LaTeX-bibitem-list' after the database files are added with `C-c RET
>> bibliography/addbibresource RET'.
>
> Hm, when I find the existing file
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> \documentclass{article}
> \usepackage{biblatex}
> \addbibresource{texbook1.bib}
> \addbibresource{texbook2.bib}
> \begin{document}
> \printbibliography
> \end{document}
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>
> `LaTeX-bibliography-list' contains both bib files, but
> `LaTeX-bibitem-list' is nil. Thus, C-c [ completes nothing (but the bib
> menu is correct). After picking one entry from that, the next C-c [
> completes only the chosen entry.
>
You have to get the parsed files associated to the the bibliography
files first (just edit and save them).
>> Maybe we can add a `TeX-run-style-hooks' inside `TeX-arg-bibliography'
>> and `LaTeX-arg-addbibresource', what do you think?
>
> Could you elaborate what and why that would achieve?
>
I suggest to add
(mapc 'TeX-run-style-hooks styles)
to the end of `TeX-arg-bibliography' (and something similar to
`LaTeX-arg-addbibresource'), just like style files of LaTeX packages
are run inside `LaTeX-arg-usepackage'. If there is already the parsed
file associated to the bibliography file, `LaTeX-bibitem-list' will be
immediately filled without the need to revert the document. And of
course we need to hope that the bibliography file has a different name
from the main document (it's not uncommon to use the same base name),
but this is a restriction intrinsic to AUCTeX, for the moment.
Bye,
Mosè
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Mosè Giordano writes:
Hi!
> actually your change does fix the problem for me, and now I can add
> keys from both database files :-) `LaTeX-bibliography-list' has both
> files and `LaTeX-bibitem-list' contains keys from both files. The
> only, minor, problem is that one has to revert the buffer to fill
> `LaTeX-bibitem-list' after the database files are added with `C-c RET
> bibliography/addbibresource RET'.
Hm, when I find the existing file
--8<---cut here---start->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{biblatex}
\addbibresource{texbook1.bib}
\addbibresource{texbook2.bib}
\begin{document}
\printbibliography
\end{document}
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
`LaTeX-bibliography-list' contains both bib files, but
`LaTeX-bibitem-list' is nil. Thus, C-c [ completes nothing (but the bib
menu is correct). After picking one entry from that, the next C-c [
completes only the chosen entry.
> Maybe we can add a `TeX-run-style-hooks' inside `TeX-arg-bibliography'
> and `LaTeX-arg-addbibresource', what do you think?
Could you elaborate what and why that would achieve?
Bye,
Tassilo
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Hi Tassilo, actually your change does fix the problem for me, and now I can add keys from both database files :-) `LaTeX-bibliography-list' has both files and `LaTeX-bibitem-list' contains keys from both files. The only, minor, problem is that one has to revert the buffer to fill `LaTeX-bibitem-list' after the database files are added with `C-c RET bibliography/addbibresource RET'. Maybe we can add a `TeX-run-style-hooks' inside `TeX-arg-bibliography' and `LaTeX-arg-addbibresource', what do you think? Thank you so much, bye, Mosè 2013/11/1 Tassilo Horn : > Mosè Giordano writes: > > Hi Mosè, > >> Following is a minimal working example. > > Thank you! > > I think I have fixed the problem in revno 114894 on the emacs trunk, at > least the reftex side of the problem. (reftex-get-bibfile-list) now > works correctly (returns both files), but the prompt you get when doing > C-c [ only completes the entry from the first bib file. > > However, that's not a reftex but an AUCTeX problem, because when AUCTeX > is installed/loaded, `reftex-citation' calls `LaTeX-bibitem-list' to get > the bib entries. > > I don't have time to look into the AUCTeX side of the problem right now. > Feel free to have a look yourself. :-) > > Bye, > Tassilo ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Mosè Giordano writes: Hi Mosè, > Following is a minimal working example. Thank you! I think I have fixed the problem in revno 114894 on the emacs trunk, at least the reftex side of the problem. (reftex-get-bibfile-list) now works correctly (returns both files), but the prompt you get when doing C-c [ only completes the entry from the first bib file. However, that's not a reftex but an AUCTeX problem, because when AUCTeX is installed/loaded, `reftex-citation' calls `LaTeX-bibitem-list' to get the bib entries. I don't have time to look into the AUCTeX side of the problem right now. Feel free to have a look yourself. :-) Bye, Tassilo ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Hi Tassilo,
it's really simple: with biblatex one can add bibliography database
files with `\bibliography' (same syntax as LaTeX built-in bibliography
system) or `\addbibresource'. Here
http://tex.stackexchange.com/q/21439/31416 you can see the main
differences between the two macros. Both can be used multiple times,
and it's here that RefTeX fails.
Following is a minimal working example. In order to use RefTeX
`texbook1.bib' and `texbook2.bib' should be in the same directory of
the document. They come with a full TeX Live, but you can also
download them from http://tug.ctan.org/tex-archive/info/biblio/ If
you prefer, use your own bibliography files.
--8<---cut here---start->8---
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{biblatex}
\addbibresource{texbook1.bib}
\addbibresource{texbook2.bib}
\begin{document}
\cite{Abdelhamid:VLB92} % in texbook1.bib
\cite{Abelson:SIC85} % in texbook2.bib
\printbibliography
\end{document}
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
The user should be able to insert both citation keys using RefTeX, but
it will use only keys from `texbook1.bib'. A workaround is to use a
comma separated list of files with `\bibliography', but
`\addbibresource' is the standard biblatex way to specify bibliography
resources and it must be given one resource per macro. As I already
said, AUCTeX without RefTeX uses correctly both bibliography
databases.
Bye,
Mosè
2013/10/31 Tassilo Horn :
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
> Hi!
>
>> sorry, I didn't specify that this occurs when the bibliography is
>> typeset using biblatex, with that package it's legal to use more than
>> one `\bibliography'. Moreover, using `\addbibresource' instead of
>> `\bibliography' (and this is the standard in `biblatex') it's
>> impossible to use a comma separated list of bibliography database
>> files, so multiple `\addbibresource's are needed.
>
> Ah, I see. I've never used biblatex myself. Could you please attach a
> minimal, commended tex file that demonstrates and explains all valid
> (and invalid) possibilities of including bibliographies when using
> biblatex.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Mosè Giordano writes: Hi! > sorry, I didn't specify that this occurs when the bibliography is > typeset using biblatex, with that package it's legal to use more than > one `\bibliography'. Moreover, using `\addbibresource' instead of > `\bibliography' (and this is the standard in `biblatex') it's > impossible to use a comma separated list of bibliography database > files, so multiple `\addbibresource's are needed. Ah, I see. I've never used biblatex myself. Could you please attach a minimal, commended tex file that demonstrates and explains all valid (and invalid) possibilities of including bibliographies when using biblatex. Bye, Tassilo ___ bug-auctex mailing list bug-auctex@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Hi Tassilo,
sorry, I didn't specify that this occurs when the bibliography is
typeset using biblatex, with that package it's legal to use more than
one `\bibliography'. Moreover, using `\addbibresource' instead of
`\bibliography' (and this is the standard in `biblatex') it's
impossible to use a comma separated list of bibliography database
files, so multiple `\addbibresource's are needed.
Bye,
Mosè
2013/10/29 Tassilo Horn :
> Mosè Giordano writes:
>
> Hi Mosè,
>
>> it seems RefTeX (I'm running Emacs 24.3.1) cannot manage multiple
>> bibliography database files specified using multiple `\bibliography'
>> macros. Consider these examples:
>>
>> \bibliography{foo,bar}
>>
>> and
>>
>> \bibliography{foo}
>> \bibliography{bar}
>
> The second version isn't legal, i.e., bibtex itself can't handle it.
> Here's what bibtex says on a test document (foo is bib1 in there, bar is
> bib2).
>
> --8<---cut here---start->8---
> Running `BibTeX' on `bar' with ``bibtex bar''
> This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013)
> The top-level auxiliary file: bar.aux
> The style file: alpha.bst
> Illegal, another \bibdata command---line 8 of file bar.aux
> : \bibdata
> : {bib2}
> I'm skipping whatever remains of this command
> Database file #1: bib1.bib
> Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "bib2book"
> (There was 1 error message)
>
> TeX Output exited abnormally with code 2 at Tue Oct 29 08:27:50
> --8<---cut here---end--->8---
>
> So it only uses the first database file, and that's exactly what
> `reftex-get-bibfile-list' returns.
>
> Bye,
> Tassilo
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
Re: [Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Mosè Giordano writes:
Hi Mosè,
> it seems RefTeX (I'm running Emacs 24.3.1) cannot manage multiple
> bibliography database files specified using multiple `\bibliography'
> macros. Consider these examples:
>
> \bibliography{foo,bar}
>
> and
>
> \bibliography{foo}
> \bibliography{bar}
The second version isn't legal, i.e., bibtex itself can't handle it.
Here's what bibtex says on a test document (foo is bib1 in there, bar is
bib2).
--8<---cut here---start->8---
Running `BibTeX' on `bar' with ``bibtex bar''
This is BibTeX, Version 0.99d (TeX Live 2013)
The top-level auxiliary file: bar.aux
The style file: alpha.bst
Illegal, another \bibdata command---line 8 of file bar.aux
: \bibdata
: {bib2}
I'm skipping whatever remains of this command
Database file #1: bib1.bib
Warning--I didn't find a database entry for "bib2book"
(There was 1 error message)
TeX Output exited abnormally with code 2 at Tue Oct 29 08:27:50
--8<---cut here---end--->8---
So it only uses the first database file, and that's exactly what
`reftex-get-bibfile-list' returns.
Bye,
Tassilo
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
[Bug-AUCTeX] RefTeX cannot manage multiple "bibliography" macros
Hi all,
it seems RefTeX (I'm running Emacs 24.3.1) cannot manage multiple
bibliography database files specified using multiple `\bibliography'
macros. Consider these examples:
\bibliography{foo,bar}
and
\bibliography{foo}
\bibliography{bar}
(`foo' and `bar' must be two existent database files). In the first
case `reftex-get-bibfile-list' returns something like
("/tmp/foo.bib" "/tmp/bar.bib")
while in the second only
("/tmp/foo.bib")
I'm not familiar with RefTeX code, can someone please look at this
problem? It's a RefTeX-only problem, AUCTeX without RefTeX works as
expected in both cases.
Thank you,
bye,
Mosè
___
bug-auctex mailing list
bug-auctex@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-auctex
