Re: Acvhieving the equivalent of check-hook?

2007-05-21 Thread Ralf Wildenhues 
* James Youngman wrote on Sun, May 20, 2007 at 10:17:18PM CEST:
 On 5/20/07, Ralf Wildenhues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 * James Youngman wrote on Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:52:26PM CEST:
 
  However, it seems to me that while this check is currently performed
  at make dist time, the _right_ plase for it is make check.
  However, per Tom Tromey's email in January, there is no check-hook.

 Would the `check-local' target be ok for you?

 Won't that inhibit the running of the DejaGnu test suite?

Have you tried it and it did not work as expected?

 (BTW, the reply-to header of your email pointed at me; was that 
 deliberate?)

There was no Reply-To: header in the mail I sent, nor in the one I
received from lists.gnu.org.  My mailer does set Mail-Followup-To:,
in this case to bug-automake and to you.  But that should not be a
problem AFAIK.  Could you (privately) send me the header of the mail
you received?

Thanks,
Ralf

Re: Acvhieving the equivalent of check-hook?

2007-05-20 Thread Ralf Wildenhues 
Hello James,

* James Youngman wrote on Sat, May 19, 2007 at 02:52:26PM CEST:
 
 However, it seems to me that while this check is currently performed
 at make dist time, the _right_ plase for it is make check.
 However, per Tom Tromey's email in January, there is no check-hook.

Would the `check-local' target be ok for you?

Cheers,
Ralf