[Bug gas/3054] unknown architecture `ep9312'
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 08:16 --- Hi Mark, GCC build with --with-cpu=ep9312 works fine with binutils. Your argument is clear to me, but what do the gcc guys think about that? Well since Richard Earnshaw is both the gcc ARM maintainer and the binutils ARM maintainer, and since I happen to know that he does not have a split personality, I think that it is safe to say that he is aware of the situation. I think that Richard's stance is that treating the EP9312 as a cpu type not an architectyre type is the correct thing to do, and that really GCC should not be accepting it with the --arch switch. I expect that he will get around to fixing this one day. (Of cource I could be wrong about this, but this is what I currently believe to be true). Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3054 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3186] New: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present
$ cat tmp.cpp
#include cstdio
void foo()
{
}
$ g++ -O1 -gdwarf-2 -g2 -feliminate-dwarf2-dups tmp.cpp -c --save-temps
$ strip --strip-debug tmp.o
BFD: st0P202e: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present
strip: st0P202e: No symbols
--
Summary: symbol `.debug_abbrev' required but not present
Product: binutils
Version: 2.17
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com
ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net
CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: *-linux
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3186
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 15:07 --- Hi Pawel, The real problem here appears to be that the libraries you are stripping contain object files of different target types (elf64-big and elf64-sparc). Objcopy was assuming that you wanted to convert all of the object files in the library to one particular file format (elf64-big - the format of the first file in the library). The error messages arose because objcopy was unable to convert some of the relocs in the object files from elf64-big to elf64-sparc. The uploaded patch should fix this problem, so that by default objcopy will preserve the file formats of copied archive elements unless it has been given the -O (or --output-target) command line switch. Please could you try it out and let me know how you get on. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/3110] unsupported relocation type {R_SPARC_H44, R_SPARC_WDISP30, R_SPARC_64}
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 15:08 --- Created an attachment (id=1290) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1290action=view) Preserve output file formats of copied archive elements unless explicitly requiested otherwise -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3110 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3129] Document use of \() in .macro
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 16:23 --- Created an attachment (id=1291) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=1291action=view) Improve macro documentation -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3129 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/3129] Document use of \() in .macro
--- Additional Comments From nickc at redhat dot com 2006-09-08 16:24 --- Hi Markus, I have applied the upload patch to improve the documenation in the way that you suggested. Cheers Nick -- What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3129 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
