Re: [incomplete patch] Get objdump to report exception tables for ARM/SH4 correctly
On Wed, 2008-04-02 at 16:47 +0100, Nick Clifton wrote: > > I've tried to tackle the conditional compilation part, and would like > > your renewed input on it, I may have missed some points. Naming for > > instance. > > > Naming was mostly OK. There were two problems. > pe_print_compressed_pdata() should really be called > pe_print_ce_compressed_pdata() since it assumes > _IMAGE_CE_RUNTIME_FUNCTION_ENTRY formatted data right ? One day someone > might want to write a MIPS version of this function, so we will need a Looks like you got interrupted while writing this sentence. Not sure what you mean. > Secondly you did not provide a default definition of bfd_pe_print_pdata, > so the PE ports which do not use this new feature will not build. Try > configuring a binutils build with "--enable-targets=all" to see this > happening. Didn't know about that. I've used it, and added one or more lines to 30 other .c files. In most cases this is just #define bfd_pe_print_pdata NULL That addresses the build problems with "--enable-targets=all". This is what you wanted me to do, right ? > Here are two other things however which I think you should also fix: I'll address the other points in your message too. One more question though. I moved my pe_print_ce_compressed_pdata function into pe-arm-wince.c , it was in peXXigen.c in my initial patch. The peXXigen.c doesn't seem right for this because this function is not to be treated with the XX replacement stuff. However, pe-arm-wince.c doesn't seem right either because the pe_print_ce_compressed_pdata function is to be used both for ARM and for SH. So where should I put it (and its helper functions) ? Thanks for your help ! Danny -- Danny Backx ; danny.backx - at - scarlet.be ; http://danny.backx.info ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/6027] Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails
-- What|Removed |Added CC||bonzini at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/6027] New: Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable-shared, with sysroot fails
Hello, This bug is a continuation from http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35532 and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35752 and http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35804 It appears that native retargeting of the gcc compiler is not supported in the 4.3/4.4 series in favor of the sysroot option. When trying to build a pass 1 compiler with combined gcc and binutils in a single directory, ld is appending an extra sysroot prefix in the linker during libgcc linking. The entire glibc and gcc+binutils toolchain is being installed in a non root directory that will eventually be used to chroot with and allow for follow on installation of a host system in the real root directory without overwriting any tool binary files. Whether the patch in http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4966 is correct or not, when applied to the combined toolchain source, it allows the bootstrap to complete successfully. -- Summary: Bootstrap of combined gcc + binutils, with --enable- shared, with sysroot fails Product: binutils Version: 2.18 Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: oblivian at users dot sourceforge dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6027 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6026] objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work.
--- Additional Comments From ktietz at onevision dot com 2008-04-03 14:46 --- Committed at revision 1.103 -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/4966] linker incorrectly prepends sysroot to absolute path
--- Additional Comments From drow at sources dot redhat dot com 2008-04-03 13:45 --- No, this bug is RESOLVED/INVALID. In the configuration described in the initial report, glibc is configured incorrectly for the way it is being used; and the patch is incorrect. If you have a different problem, please report it in a new bug. -- What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution||INVALID http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4966 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6026] objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work.
--- Additional Comments From ktietz at onevision dot com 2008-04-03 13:35 --- Created an attachment (id=2349) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2349&action=view) Fix for problem The rva's offset for IAT and thunk was not set to PE_IDATA4_SIZE or PE_IDATA5_SIZE. This results in wrong values read on 4 byte offset. -- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |ktietz at onevision dot com |redhat dot com | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6026] objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work.
-- What|Removed |Added GCC host triplet||x86_64-gnu-linux http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6026] objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work.
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2008-04-03 11:15 --- Created an attachment (id=2348) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2348&action=view) dep walker report. the a.exe's import table looks broken. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6026] objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work.
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2008-04-03 10:22 --- $ x86_64-pc-mingw32-gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: x86_64-pc-mingw32 Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/tmp/root-x86_64-pc-linux --with-sysroot=/tmp/root-x86_64-pc-linux --target=x86_64-pc-mingw32 Thread model: win32 gcc version 4.4.0 20080402 (experimental) (GCC) this is a mingw64 toolchain snapshot from sf.net. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6026] objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work.
--- Additional Comments From pluto at agmk dot net 2008-04-03 10:19 --- Created an attachment (id=2347) --> (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=2347&action=view) testcase -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/6026] New: objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work.
$ x86_64-pc-mingw32-objdump -p a.exe (...) DLL Name: b.dll vma: Hint/Ord Member-Name Bound-To Segmentation fault Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. bfd_getl16 (p=0x1e63ad0) at ../../src/bfd/libbfd.c:559 559 ../../src/bfd/libbfd.c: No such file or directory. in ../../src/bfd/libbfd.c (gdb) bt #0 bfd_getl16 (p=0x1e63ad0) at ../../src/bfd/libbfd.c:559 #1 0x004486b5 in pe_print_idata (abfd=0x1e67090, vfile=) at pex64igen.c:1302 #2 0x00448fa1 in _bfd_pex64_print_private_bfd_data_common (abfd=0x1e67090, vfile=0x2aaad000) at pex64igen.c:1976 #3 0x00452449 in pe_print_private_bfd_data (abfd=0x1e63ad0, vfile=0x2aaad000) at ../../src/bfd/peicode.h:335 #4 0x004043bc in dump_bfd (abfd=0x1e67090) at ../../src/binutils/objdump.c:2440 #5 0x00404bff in display_bfd (abfd=0x1e67090) at ../../src/binutils/objdump.c:3004 #6 0x00404d48 in display_file (filename=0x7fffba1799b4 "a.exe", target=) at ../../src/binutils/objdump.c:3065 #7 0x0040534c in main (argc=3, argv=0x7fffba177868) at ../../src/binutils/objdump.c:3311 and the major thing, the a.exe doesn't work on winxp64. it should print hello world but i see nothing on the windows console. -- Summary: objdump craches on simple *.exe / application doesn't work. Product: binutils Version: 2.18 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC target triplet: x86_64-pc-mingw32 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6026 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
