[Bug binutils/10403] New: environment variable RM=/bin/rm causes 'make' to fail in bfd
For binutils-2.19.1 built using gcc-4.4.0 on an x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu system, if I set the environment variable RM=/bin/rm then binutils fails to build during make, specifically in directory bfd. (/bin/rm --version says rm (GNU coreutils) 6.10) Is that a bug? -- Summary: environment variable RM=/bin/rm causes 'make' to fail in bfd Product: binutils Version: 2.19 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: mariah dot lenox at gmail dot com CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10403 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/10400] Gold produces incorrect debug and unwind info when incompatible COMDAT sections are present
--- Additional Comments From ppluzhnikov at google dot com 2009-07-16 16:19 --- (In reply to comment #3) let me know if you have a chance to try it on some other test cases. Thanks for the prompt fix. I've linked two of my real executables (which both exhibited GDB glitches) with patched gold, and the problem is fixed there as well :-) -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10400 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10288] objdump -D --target=binary -m arm7tdmi shows non-ARM7TDMI instructions
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-07-16 18:16 --- Nick Many bit regions in ARM instructions are specified as SBZ Should Be Zero. ARM docs say if these bits are NOT zero that the results are UNPREDICTABLE for all ARM chips! So the question is what is the best thing for objdump to do in these situations where a bit region is not zeroed out when it should be. I think the cleanest thing to do is to return UNDEFINED. I found some incorrect ldrsb's and ldrsh's that I think would best be interpreted as UNDEFINED instead Here are some examples. (These all have SBZ regions that aren't zeroed out)... 2fe40: 001001d0ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r0 2fe44: 001001d1ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r1 2fe48: 001001d2ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r2 2fe4c: 001001d3ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r3 2fe50: 001001d4ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r4 2fe54: 001001d5ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r5 2fe58: 001001d6ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r6 2fe5c: 001001d7ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r7 2fe60: 001001d8ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r8 2fe64: 001001d9ldrsbeq r0, [r0], -r9 2fec0: 001001f0ldrsheq r0, [r0], -r0 2fec4: 001001f1ldrsheq r0, [r0], -r1 2fec8: 001001f2ldrsheq r0, [r0], -r2 2fecc: 001001f3ldrsheq r0, [r0], -r3 2fed0: 001001f4ldrsheq r0, [r0], -r4 2fed4: 001001f5ldrsheq r0, [r0], -r5 2fed8: 001001f6ldrsheq r0, [r0], -r6 ...etc. Would it be hard for you to make these return UNDEFINED? cs -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10288 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/10400] Gold produces incorrect debug and unwind info when incompatible COMDAT sections are present
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-07-17 01:07 --- Subject: Bug 10400 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: i...@sourceware.org 2009-07-17 01:07:34 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog layout.cc layout.h object.cc object.h plugin.cc Log message: PR 10400 * layout.h: #include map. (class Kept_section): Change from struct to class. Add accessors and setters. Add section size to Comdat_group mapping. Change Comdat_group to std::map. Add is_comdat_ field. Add linkonce_size field in union. (class Layout): Update declaration of find_or_add_kept_section. Don't declare find_kept_object. * layout.cc (Layout::find_or_add_kept_section): Remove candidate parameter. Add object, shndx, is_comdat, and is_group_name parameters. Change all callers. Adjust for new Kept_section. (Layout::find_kept_object): Remove. * object.cc (Sized_relobj::include_section_group): Update use of Kept_section. Rename secnum to shndx. Only record Kept_comdat_section if sections are the same size. (Sized_relobj::include_linkonce_section): Update use of Kept_section. Only record Kept_comdat_section if sections are the same size. Set size of linkonce section. (Sized_relobj::map_to_kept_section): Update call to get_kept_comdat_section. * object.h (class Sized_relobj): Rename fields in Kept_comdat_section to drop trailing underscores; change object field to Relobj*. Change Kept_comdat_section_table to store struct rather than pointer. (Sized_relobj::set_kept_comdat_section): Remove kept parameter. Add kept_object and kept_shndx parameters. Change all callers. (Sized_relobj::get_kept_comdat_section): Change return type to bool. Add kept_object and kept_shndx parameters. Change all callers. * plugin.cc (Pluginobj::include_comdat_group): Update call to Layout::find_or_add_kept_section. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.257r2=1.258 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/layout.cc.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.131r2=1.132 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/layout.h.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.67r2=1.68 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/object.cc.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.95r2=1.96 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/object.h.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.75r2=1.76 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/plugin.cc.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.15r2=1.16 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10400 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/10400] Gold produces incorrect debug and unwind info when incompatible COMDAT sections are present
--- Additional Comments From ian at airs dot com 2009-07-17 01:28 --- Patch committed. -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10400 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
