[Bug ld/10474] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 errors
--- Additional Comments From cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-08-04 08:15 --- Subject: Bug 10474 CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by: amo...@sourceware.org 2009-08-04 08:15:24 Modified files: ld : ChangeLog ld/emultempl : ppc32elf.em Log message: PR 10474 * emultempl/ppc32elf.em (ppc_before_allocation): Test rawsize, not size, after lang_reset_memory_regions. Patches: http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.2016r2=1.2017 http://sources.redhat.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/emultempl/ppc32elf.em.diff?cvsroot=srcr1=1.19r2=1.20 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/10474] relocation truncated to fit: R_PPC_REL24 errors
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-08-04 08:18 --- . -- What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10474 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] New: File format not recognized for some solaris libraries
it seems there's problems reading the format of some solaris 10 libraries: === $ uname -a SunOS m5000-1.dev.nlatlu.wipro.com 5.10 Generic_139555-08 sun4u sparc SUNW,SPARC-Enterprise Solaris $ size --version GNU size (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.19.51.0.14.20090722 Copyright 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is free software; you may redistribute it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 3 or (at your option) any later version. This program has absolutely no warranty. $ size /usr/lib/libC.so.* textdata bss dec hex filename 7224627071049 76002 128e2 /usr/lib/libC.so.3 size: /usr/lib/libC.so.5: File format not recognized === this happens not just with the size tool, also with objdump, ... will attach libC.so.3 and libC.so.5 -- Summary: File format not recognized for some solaris libraries Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: binutils AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: niki dot waibel at gmx dot net CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.10 GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.10 GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.10 http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] File format not recognized for some solaris libraries
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-08-04 11:46 --- Created an attachment (id=4111) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4111action=view) file recognized okay -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] File format not recognized for some solaris libraries
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-08-04 11:48 --- Created an attachment (id=4112) -- (http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=4112action=view) file format not recognized -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] File format not recognized for some solaris libraries
--- Additional Comments From niki dot waibel at gmx dot net 2009-08-04 13:22 --- by the way: === $ /opt/binutils/2.18.50.0.4/bin/size /usr/lib/libC.so.* textdata bss dec hex filename 7224627071049 76002 128e2 /usr/lib/libC.so.3 313309 21201 59788 394298 6043a /usr/lib/libC.so.5 === /opt/binutils/2.18.50.0.6/bin/size /usr/lib/libC.so.* textdata bss dec hex filename 7224627071049 76002 128e2 /usr/lib/libC.so.3 /opt/binutils/2.18.50.0.6/bin/size: /usr/lib/libC.so.5: File format not recognized === ... unfortunately version 2.18.50.0.5 i've not available for testing. -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10288] objdump -D --target=binary -m arm7tdmi shows non-ARM7TDMI instructions
--- Additional Comments From chris at seberino dot org 2009-08-04 17:03 --- Nick Would it be possible for me to take a few weeks break from our work on http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10288 and come back to it? Other things came up in the short term and these last few bugs are a little trickier than the early more obvious ones. I'd like to rest for a bit doing other things and then come back. I don't know if you want to close this ticket for now or leave it open until I return. I just don't want you to think I'm bailing on this. Chris -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10288 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/10479] New: Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions
The following patch introduces bunch of checks for usage of sp and pc registers as operands for thumb instructions: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-01/msg00363.html In particular, it rejects, for example, the following two instructions: addw sp, sp, #0 subw sp, sp, #0 here sp is used as destination register and this is perfectly allowed according to ARM documentation. Only pc as destination register lead to unpredictable results. See e.g. A8.6.215 SUB (SP minus immediate) of ARMv7-A / ARMv7-R Architecture Reference Manual. -- Summary: Too strict checks for addw / subw instructions Product: binutils Version: unspecified Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassigned at sources dot redhat dot com ReportedBy: asl at math dot spbu dot ru CC: bug-binutils at gnu dot org,joseph at codesourcery dot com GCC target triplet: arm-none-linux-gnueabi http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10479 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/4572] division doesn't work on solaris/x86
--- Additional Comments From hjl dot tools at gmail dot com 2009-08-04 22:57 --- A patch is posted at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2009-08/msg00048.html -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4572 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/10478] File format not recognized for some solaris libraries
--- Additional Comments From amodra at bigpond dot net dot au 2009-08-05 00:25 --- This is the reason for the failure: [13] .exception_ranges PROGBITS000412ec 0412ec 007aac 00 A 65280 0 4 When reading an ELF file BFD does some basic sanity checks in elf_object_p. Why does .exception_ranges have an invalid sh_link value of 65280? -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10478 --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils