[Bug ld/12562] Ld.dk fails with "could not read symbols: Bad value" message
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12562 --- Comment #7 from Dave Korn 2011-03-12 06:00:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > Created attachment 5299 [details] > Fixed respin. > > Moved all the chain manipulation inside the if-new-files-added test. Appears > to work properly this time. I have inadvertently mixed code and variable declarations c99 style there; I'll refactor that before I send it to the mailing list but it should still be good for testing. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12562] Ld.dk fails with "could not read symbols: Bad value" message
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12562 --- Comment #6 from Dave Korn 2011-03-12 05:58:59 UTC --- Created attachment 5299 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5299 Fixed respin. Moved all the chain manipulation inside the if-new-files-added test. Appears to work properly this time. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12562] Ld.dk fails with "could not read symbols: Bad value" message
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12562 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5298|0 |1 is obsolete|| --- Comment #5 from Dave Korn 2011-03-12 05:35:42 UTC --- Comment on attachment 5298 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5298 Fix typo in 003ld-plugin-api-link-order.diff patch is buggy. will spin a new one tomorrow. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12562] Ld.dk fails with "could not read symbols: Bad value" message
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12562 Dave Korn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |davek at gcc dot gnu.org |redhat.com | --- Comment #4 from Dave Korn 2011-03-12 03:05:03 UTC --- Created attachment 5298 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5298 Fix typo in 003ld-plugin-api-link-order.diff There was a typo in 003ld-plugin-api-link-order.diff, at the point where it has to open the new files that were added by the plugin through the add_input_file callback; it starts at the wrong point in the chain of input files, reopening the existing ones before it reaches the newly-added files. Reopening the object files is ignored, but reopening the libraries causes them to be rescanned, and since toupper still isn't defined at this point - the ltrans.o file not having been opened yet - when we reopen libxxx we pull in toupper.o again (it already having been pulled in, then claimed by the plugin, first time round). The backend complains about the same library module being supposedly pulled in twice. Solved by starting the reopen at the correct point, i.e. the old tail of the list, which is where the new input files will have been added. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fail to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #26 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 22:12:02 UTC --- Hmm, the LDFLAGS are simply ignored by gcc. And gcc builds fine when I configure it with: --with-boot-ldflags=-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12572] FAIL: debug_msg.sh
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12572 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-11 21:42:53 UTC --- Should be fixed now. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12572] FAIL: debug_msg.sh
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12572 --- Comment #2 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-11 21:42:15 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Changes by:i...@sourceware.org2011-03-11 21:42:12 Modified files: gold : ChangeLog gold/testsuite : debug_msg.sh odr_violation2.cc Log message: PR gold/12572 * testsuite/odr_violation2.cc: Add comment to make all error line numbers double digits. * testsuite/debug_msg.sh: Adjust expected errors. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.704&r2=1.705 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/testsuite/debug_msg.sh.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.11&r2=1.12 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/gold/testsuite/odr_violation2.cc.diff?cvsroot=src&r1=1.3&r2=1.4 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #25 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 21:02:12 UTC --- Even gcc fails to build with the same combination (-flto and Wl,--as-needed): ... /var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/g++ -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/./prev-gcc/ -B/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ -nostdinc++ -B/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -I/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -I/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include -I/var/tmp/gcc/libstdc++-v3/libsupc++ -L/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/prev-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.libs -march=native -O2 -pipe -flto=jobserver -frandom-seed=1 -fprofile-use -DIN_GCC -W -Wall -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros -Wno-overlength-strings -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc gcov.o intl.o version.o errors.o ../libcpp/libcpp.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a -o gcov /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_dl_argv@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_rtld_global_ro@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__tls_get_addr@GLIBC_2.3' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `_rtld_global@GLIBC_PRIVATE' /lib64/libc.so.6: undefined reference to `__libc_enable_secure@GLIBC_PRIVATE' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status make[3]: *** [gcov] Error 1 make[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs rm gfortran.pod cpp.pod gcov.pod gcc.pod fsf-funding.pod gfdl.pod make[3]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir/gcc' make[2]: *** [all-stagefeedback-gcc] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir' make[1]: *** [stagefeedback-bubble] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/var/tmp/gcc_build_dir' make: *** [profiledbootstrap] Error 2 Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr --bindir=/usr/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/gcc-bin/4.6.0 --includedir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/include --datadir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0 --mandir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/man --infodir=/usr/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/info --with-gxx-include-dir=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/include/g++-v4 --host=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-pc-linux-gnu --disable-altivec --disable-fixed-point --without-ppl --without-cloog --enable-lto --enable-nls --without-included-gettext --with-system-zlib --disable-werror --enable-build-with-cxx --enable-initfini-array --with-gold --enable-secureplt --enable-libmudflap --disable-libssp --enable-libgomp --enable-cld --with-python-dir=/share/gcc-data/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.6.0/python --enable-checking=release --disable-libgcj --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --disable-multilib --enable-clocale=gnu --with-build-config=bootstrap-lto And build with: make -j4 BOOT_CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" STAGE1_CFLAGS="-march=native -O2 -pipe" CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-march=native -O2 -pipe" LDFLAGS="-Wl,-O1,--hash-style=gnu,--as-needed" profiledbootstrap -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fail to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc & Firefox fails to |gcc & Firefox fail to build |build with -flto and|with -flto and --as-needed |--as-needed LDFLAGS |LDFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] gcc & Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Firefox fails to build with |gcc & Firefox fails to |-flto and --as-needed |build with -flto and |LDFLAGS |--as-needed LDFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #24 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 19:24:33 UTC --- >I really need a small testcase. Understood. I will take a deeper look. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12572] FAIL: debug_msg.sh
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12572 Jeffrey Yasskin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jyasskin at gmail dot com -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed||2011.03.11 19:20:55 Ever Confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-11 19:20:55 UTC --- I really need a small testcase. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12572] FAIL: debug_msg.sh
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12572 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Yasskin 2011-03-11 19:18:55 UTC --- Created attachment 5296 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5296 Fix the debug_msg.sh test. I can reproduce this by switching from Ubuntu Lucid's native gcc-4.4.3 to gcc-4.6-svn, probably because they optimize different instructions into the front of Ordering::operator(). One fix is to add a comment just before that function, so that all its line numbers are two digits, which will cause detect_odr_violations() to sort a consistent line into the first place, regardless of gcc optimizes it. Here's a patch that passes with both gcc-4.4.3 and gcc-4.6-svn. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 Octoploid changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever Confirmed|1 |0 --- Comment #22 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 19:02:50 UTC --- GNU ld (Linux/GNU Binutils) 2.21.51.0.7.20110306 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|WAITING --- Comment #21 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-11 19:02:11 UTC --- Exactly which linker are you using? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|--as-needed doesn't work|Firefox fails to build with |with g++|-flto and --as-needed ||LDFLAGS -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] --as-needed doesn't work with g++
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-11 18:54:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) > [hjl@gnu-6 pr12557]$ cat x.c This test is wrong. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12572] New: FAIL: debug_msg.sh
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12572 Summary: FAIL: debug_msg.sh Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com On Fedora 14/x86-64, I got FAIL: debug_msg.sh (exit: 1) Did not find expected error in debug_msg.err: odr_violation2.cc:9 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] --as-needed doesn't work with g++
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Firefox fails to build with |--as-needed doesn't work
|-flto and --as-needed |with g++
|LDFLAGS |
--- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-11 18:36:35
UTC ---
[hjl@gnu-6 pr12557]$ cat x.c
int x = 20;
[hjl@gnu-6 pr12557]$ cat foo.c
#include
extern int x;
void
foo ()
{
printf ("%d\n", x);
}
[hjl@gnu-6 pr12557]$ cat main.c
extern void foo ();
int
main ()
{
foo ();
return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-6 pr12557]$ make
g++ -shared -fPIC -o libx.so x.c
g++ -shared -fPIC -o libfoo.so foo.c libx.so
g++ -Wl,--as-needed -o x main.o -L. -lfoo -lx -Wl,-R,.
main.o: In function `main':
main.c:(.text+0xa): undefined reference to `foo'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [x] Error 1
[hjl@gnu-6 pr12557]$
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #18 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 18:23:03 UTC --- Created attachment 5295 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5295 gcc_verbose_bad -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #17 from Octoploid 2011-03-11 18:22:34 UTC --- Created attachment 5294 --> http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5294 gcc_verbose_good -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12557] Firefox fails to build with -flto and --as-needed LDFLAGS
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12557 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-11 17:57:01 UTC --- Please show the output of "g++ -v ...". -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12570] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12571] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12571 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12525] gold SEGV linking libgcc_s.so.1 on Solaris 11/x86
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12525 --- Comment #23 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-11 15:40:46 UTC --- > --- Comment #21 from Ian Lance Taylor 2011-03-09 > 01:56:59 UTC --- [...] > I committed a patch which should fix the problem of passing too many values to > readv. That fixes all related failures, thanks. > I don't know what's going on with the other two errors. I'll see if I can find anything over the weekend. This also blocks a gcc bootstrap with gold. Rainer -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12494] Relaxation leads to wrong code optimization (computed goto)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12494 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Target|avr-elf |avr Version|2.19|2.20 --- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-03-11 13:35:09 UTC --- Unpatched binutils 2.20 also trigger this bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12571] New: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12571
Summary: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: gold
AssignedTo: i...@airs.com
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
CC: f...@redhat.com
Depends on: 12570
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #12570 +++
echo 'main(){pause();}' | gcc -x c - -g
gdb -nx ./a.out
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2.50.20110311-cvs
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu".
(gdb) b 'pause@plt'
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4003a0
(gdb) run
(gdb) stepi 2
(gdb) disass
Dump of assembler code for function pause@plt:
0x004003a0 <+0>:jmpq *0x200482(%rip)
0x004003a6 <+6>:pushq $0x0
=> 0x004003ab <+11>:jmpq 0x400390
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x004003ab in pause@plt ()
#1 0x in ?? ()
.plt needs associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame entries.
GDB could workaround it but it affects also oprofile, probably systemtap etc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12570] .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||12571 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12570] New: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12570
Summary: .plt has no associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: minor
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: jan.kratoch...@redhat.com
CC: f...@redhat.com
echo 'main(){pause();}' | gcc -x c - -g
gdb -nx ./a.out
GNU gdb (GDB) 7.2.50.20110311-cvs
This GDB was configured as "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu".
(gdb) b 'pause@plt'
Breakpoint 1 at 0x4003a0
(gdb) run
(gdb) stepi 2
(gdb) disass
Dump of assembler code for function pause@plt:
0x004003a0 <+0>:jmpq *0x200482(%rip)
0x004003a6 <+6>:pushq $0x0
=> 0x004003ab <+11>:jmpq 0x400390
End of assembler dump.
(gdb) bt
#0 0x004003ab in pause@plt ()
#1 0x in ?? ()
.plt needs associated .eh_frame/.debug_frame entries.
GDB could workaround it but it affects also oprofile, probably systemtap etc.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12562] Ld.dk fails with "could not read symbols: Bad value" message
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12562 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-11 12:23:30 UTC --- > Also, are you testing CVS HEAD from before or after > the five patches I committed a couple of hours ago? After, with and without 005ld-link-stage2.diff. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12569] New: Assertion failure in get_known_segmented_expression (ARM)
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12569 Summary: Assertion failure in get_known_segmented_expression (ARM) Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gas AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com ReportedBy: p...@google.com demo.s: .p2align 4 pcpos: .globl foo .type foo,function .p2align 4 bx lr .set pos, (. - pcpos) .fill (pos & 15), 4, 0x0 $ install/arm-none-linux-gnueabi/bin/as demo.s demo.s: Assembler messages: demo.s:11: Internal error! Assertion failure in get_known_segmented_expression at ../../src/gas/read.c line 5435. Please report this bug. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
