Wrong release date for binutils 2.21 - release date is 12/08/11
Hello, I have seen that the release date for binutils 2.21 on ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils is in the future 12/08/11 09:58AM [GMT] 18,742,991 binutils-2.21.tar.bz2/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.21.tar.bz2 12/08/11 09:58AM [GMT] 194 binutils-2.21.tar.bz2.sig/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.21.tar.bz2.sig 12/08/11 09:59AM [GMT] 25,021,590 binutils-2.21.tar.gz/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.21.tar.gz 1 12/08/11 09:59AM [GMT] 194 binutils-2.21.tar.gz.sig/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.21.tar.gz.sig Mit freundlichen Grüßen Gerlinde Hulin Siemens AG Energy Sector Power Distribution Division Energy Automation E D EA SOL D TC1 Humboldtstr. 59 90459 Nürnberg, Deutschland Tel.: +49 (911) 433-7689 Fax: +49 (911) 433-8295 mailto:gerlinde.hu...@siemens.com Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard Cromme; Vorstand: Peter Löscher, Vorsitzender; Wolfgang Dehen, Brigitte Ederer, Joe Kaeser, Barbara Kux, Hermann Requardt, Siegfried Russwurm, Peter Y. Solmssen; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und München, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, München, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: Wrong release date for binutils 2.21 - release date is 12/08/11
On Mar 29, 2011, at 10:55 AM, Hulin, Gerlinde (E D EA SOL D TC1) wrote: Hello, I have seen that the release date for binutils 2.21 on ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils is in the future 12/08/11 09:58AM [GMT] 18,742,991 binutils-2.21.tar.bz2 12/08/11 09:58AM [GMT] 194 binutils-2.21.tar.bz2.sig 12/08/11 09:59AM [GMT] 25,021,590 binutils-2.21.tar.gz 1 12/08/11 09:59AM [GMT] 194 binutils-2.21.tar.gz.sig Transient error ? binutils-2.21.tar.bz2 18304 KB 12/8/10 9:58:00 AM binutils-2.21.tar.bz2.sig 1 KB 12/8/10 9:58:00 AM binutils-2.21.tar.gz 24436 KB 12/8/10 9:59:00 AM binutils-2.21.tar.gz.sig 1 KB 12/8/10 9:59:00 AM Tristan. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Gerlinde Hulin Siemens AG Energy Sector Power Distribution Division Energy Automation E D EA SOL D TC1 Humboldtstr. 59 90459 Nürnberg, Deutschland Tel.: +49 (911) 433-7689 Fax: +49 (911) 433-8295 mailto:gerlinde.hu...@siemens.com Siemens Aktiengesellschaft: Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Gerhard Cromme; Vorstand: Peter Löscher, Vorsitzender; Wolfgang Dehen, Brigitte Ederer, Joe Kaeser, Barbara Kux, Hermann Requardt, Siegfried Russwurm, Peter Y. Solmssen; Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin und München, Deutschland; Registergericht: Berlin Charlottenburg, HRB 12300, München, HRB 6684; WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 23691322 ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
Re: Wrong release date for binutils 2.21 - release date is 12/08/11
Hulin, Gerlinde (E D EA SOL D TC1) gerlinde.hu...@siemens.com writes: Hello, I have seen that the release date for binutils 2.21 on ftp://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/binutils is in the future 12/08/11 09:58AM [GMT] 18,742,991 binutils-2.21.tar.bz2/gnu/binutils/binutils-2.21.tar.bz2 Must be a problem on your side, the timestamp on ftp.gnu.org is 2010-12-08. ftp modtime binutils-2.21.tar.bz2 binutils-2.21.tar.bz2 12/08/2010 09:58:41 GMT Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, sch...@redhat.com GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E And now for something completely different. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12618] New: Can't resolve difference between symbol and start of its own section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12618
Summary: Can't resolve difference between symbol and start of
its own section
Product: binutils
Version: 2.21
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: gas
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: sute...@aon.at
Created attachment 5339
-- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5339
Preprocessed source to reproduce build error
I think I've hit a bug in recent binutils compiling eglibc 2.13 for generic
i686-unknown-linux-gnu (with multi-arch support enabled). At some point in the
build it stops with:
../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strcmp.S: Assembler messages:
../sysdeps/i386/i686/multiarch/strcmp.S:90: Error: can't resolve `.text' {.text
section} - `strcmp' {.text section}
From what I know, it tries to compute the difference between the address of the
symbol strcmp (in the .text section) and the start of the .text section but
fails. Even if there where multiple sections named .text this should work, I
presume.
The error does not occur with earlier versions of binutils (tested with
2.19.51.0.14 and 2.20.51.0.12). The error does occur with 2.21.51.0.7.
The file in question is attached (as preprocessed source), and the error should
be reproducable with something like
i686-unknown-linux-gnu-as strcmp.s
If you need more information to investigate, please let me know.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12610] gas calculates wrong difference between two labels
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org AssignedTo|unassigned at sources dot |rth at gcc dot gnu.org |redhat.com | --- Comment #4 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 17:16:25 UTC --- Confirmed. The label is getting attached to the end of the alignment, rather than the beginning. Examine the following with and without the fixme label: .text unop unop unop unop $LEHB25: jsr$26,_Unwind_Resume $LEHE25: $fixme: .align4 fnop .data .long$LEHE25 - $LEHB25 Somewhat amusingly, we get the correct answer *with* fixme present. I have some vague rememberance that the old coff assembler had some sort of auto-alignment feature, which got copied into the elf assembler. I suspect this is what is causing the problem. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12610] gas calculates wrong difference between two labels
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12610 Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson rth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-29 18:26:33 UTC --- Fixed. More commentary at http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2011-03/msg00525.html -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gas/12296] cortex-m3: SVC is not permitted on this architecture
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12296 --- Comment #2 from Dan McDonald dan at wellkeeper dot com 2011-03-29 19:52:08 UTC --- Created attachment 5340 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5340 update ARM_AEXT_V7_ARM macro to include ARM_OS_EXT flag This also affects target arm-none-eabi. Like Claudio, I am also trying to compile FreeRTOS. It looks like the v7 processor profile (which the Cortex-M3 is an example of) neglects to mark the os extension as being available. I attached a diff against CVS that fixes this issue for me. The patch updates the ARM_AEXT_V7_ARM macro to also include the ARM_OS_EXT flag. I believe that all v7 processors have the SVC instruction (based on the v7-M and v7-AR reference manuals). $ echo 'svc 0' /tmp/x.s $ arm-none-eabi-as -mcpu=cortex-m3 /tmp/x.s -o /tmp/x.o $ arm-none-eabi-objdump -d /tmp/x.o /tmp/x.o: file format elf32-littlearm Disassembly of section .text: .text: 0:df00 svc0 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12621] New: ld plugin cannot be built for mingw by cross compiling on Linux or other Unix-like system.
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12621 Summary: ld plugin cannot be built for mingw by cross compiling on Linux or other Unix-like system. Product: binutils Version: 2.21 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com ReportedBy: lanxing...@gmail.com The autoconf script of ld test the header Windows.h other than windows.h. This should work on Windows because its file system are not case sensitive. However, when cross compiling ld on Linux or other Unix-like system, it cause Windows.h test failure, result in linker plugin not available. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
