[Bug ld/12801] ICE in bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 2764 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||DUPLICATE --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-25 15:36:11 UTC --- Dup. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 12366 *** -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12801] ICE in bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 2764 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801 Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 08:35:48 UTC --- I don't have mainline around. I have 2.20 around which works and 2.21 and the top of the 2.21 branch which both fail. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12804] New: Incremental link tests failed
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 Summary: Incremental link tests failed Product: binutils Version: 2.22 (HEAD) Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: gold AssignedTo: i...@airs.com ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com On Linux/x86-64, I got make[7]: *** [incremental_test_2] Error 1 make[7]: *** [incremental_test_3] Error 1 make[7]: *** [incremental_test_4] Error 1 make[6]: *** [check-am] Error 2 Linux/ia32 seems OK. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 Ian Lance Taylor ian at airs dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC||ian at airs dot com AssignedTo|ian at airs dot com |ccoutant at google dot com -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12710] Relative paths in thin archives are incorrect in certain cases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12710 --- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2011-05-25 16:19:47 UTC --- Created attachment 5751 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5751 fix thin archive pathname appending -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12710] Relative paths in thin archives are incorrect in certain cases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12710 Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING CC||nickc at redhat dot com --- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton nickc at redhat dot com 2011-05-25 16:20:24 UTC --- Hi Spoo, Please could you try out the uploaded patch and let me know what you think ? Cheers Nick -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12801] ICE in bfd/elf64-x86-64.c line 2764 in elf64_x86_64_relocate_section
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12801 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-25 12:26:39 UTC --- Please try: ftp://sourceware.org/pub/binutils/snapshots/binutils-2.21.51.tar.bz2 -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12366] assertion failure with STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols on x86_64
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12366 --- Comment #6 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 17:41:40 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Branch: binutils-2_21-branch Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-05-25 17:41:35 Modified files: ld/testsuite : ChangeLog ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc: ifunc-10-i386.s ifunc-10-x86-64.s ifunc-11-i386.s ifunc-11-x86-64.s bfd: ChangeLog elf-ifunc.c elf32-i386.c elf64-x86-64.c Added files: ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc: ifunc-12-i386.d ifunc-12-i386.s ifunc-12-x86-64.d ifunc-12-x86-64.s ifunc-13-i386.d ifunc-13-x86-64.d ifunc-13a-i386.s ifunc-13a-x86-64.s ifunc-13b-i386.s ifunc-13b-x86-64.s Log message: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library. bfd/ 2012-05-25 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport from mainline 2012-01-06 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR ld/12366 PR ld/12371 * elf-ifunc.c (_bfd_elf_allocate_ifunc_dyn_relocs): Properly handle symbols marked with regular reference, but not non-GOT reference when building shared library. * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_gc_sweep_hook): Properly handle local and global STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library. * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_gc_sweep_hook): Likewise. ld/testsuite/ 2012-05-25 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport from mainline 2012-01-06 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR ld/12366 PR ld/12371 * ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-i386.s: Add more tests. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.d: New. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.d: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-i386.d: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-x86-64.d: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-x86-64.s: Likewise. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1322.2.11r2=1.1322.2.12 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-i386.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-x86-64.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.5180.2.33r2=1.5180.2.34 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf-ifunc.c.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.4r2=1.4.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-i386.c.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.241.2.1r2=1.241.2.2
[Bug ld/12371] Garbage collection for STT_GNU_IFUNC symbols in shared library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12371 --- Comment #3 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-05-25 17:41:40 UTC --- CVSROOT:/cvs/src Module name:src Branch: binutils-2_21-branch Changes by:h...@sourceware.org2011-05-25 17:41:35 Modified files: ld/testsuite : ChangeLog ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc: ifunc-10-i386.s ifunc-10-x86-64.s ifunc-11-i386.s ifunc-11-x86-64.s bfd: ChangeLog elf-ifunc.c elf32-i386.c elf64-x86-64.c Added files: ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc: ifunc-12-i386.d ifunc-12-i386.s ifunc-12-x86-64.d ifunc-12-x86-64.s ifunc-13-i386.d ifunc-13-x86-64.d ifunc-13a-i386.s ifunc-13a-x86-64.s ifunc-13b-i386.s ifunc-13b-x86-64.s Log message: Handle STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library. bfd/ 2012-05-25 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport from mainline 2012-01-06 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR ld/12366 PR ld/12371 * elf-ifunc.c (_bfd_elf_allocate_ifunc_dyn_relocs): Properly handle symbols marked with regular reference, but not non-GOT reference when building shared library. * elf32-i386.c (elf_i386_gc_sweep_hook): Properly handle local and global STT_GNU_IFUNC symols when building shared library. * elf64-x86-64.c (elf_x86_64_gc_sweep_hook): Likewise. ld/testsuite/ 2012-05-25 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com Backport from mainline 2012-01-06 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com PR ld/12366 PR ld/12371 * ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-i386.s: Add more tests. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.d: New. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.d: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-i386.d: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-x86-64.d: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-x86-64.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-i386.s: Likewise. * ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-x86-64.s: Likewise. Patches: http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1322.2.11r2=1.1322.2.12 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-12-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-i386.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13-x86-64.d.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13a-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-13b-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=NONEr2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-10-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-i386.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/ifunc-11-x86-64.s.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.1r2=1.1.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.5180.2.33r2=1.5180.2.34 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf-ifunc.c.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.4r2=1.4.2.1 http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/src/bfd/elf32-i386.c.diff?cvsroot=srconly_with_tag=binutils-2_21-branchr1=1.241.2.1r2=1.241.2.2
[Bug binutils/12558] AR move in an archive operation fails
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12558 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||nickc at redhat dot com -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 --- Comment #1 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at google dot com 2011-05-25 17:47:37 UTC --- Can you attach the file testsuite/test-suite.log? What version of gcc are you configured with? -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12559] GOLD cannot find entry symbol in a static library
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12559 Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||FIXED --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev d.g.gorbachev at gmail dot com 2011-05-25 18:25:24 UTC --- Fixed by http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils-cvs/2011-05/msg00166.html. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com 2011-05-25 18:29:53 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Can you attach the file testsuite/test-suite.log? What version of gcc are you configured with? [hjl@gnu-6 gold]$ find -name *.log ./bootstrap-test.log ./config.log ./test-suite.log ./bootstrap-test-r.log [hjl@gnu-6 gold]$ cat ./test-suite.log gold 0.1: ./test-suite.log All 2 tests passed. .. contents:: :depth: 2 [hjl@gnu-6 gold]$ g++ -W -Wall-Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -g -O2 -o gc_comdat_test -Bgcctestdir/ -Wl,--gc-sections gc_comdat_test_1.o gc_comdat_test_2.o gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 't1_2()' gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 't1a()' gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 'f10()' gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 'f11b(int (*)())' gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 'f12()' gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.o: multiple definition of 'f13()' gcctestdir/ld: two_file_test_tmp.o: previous definition here gcctestdir/ld: error: two_file_test_2.og++ -W -Wall-Werror -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -fmerge-constants -g -O2 -o gc_tls_test -Bgcctestdir/ -Wl,--gc-sections gc_tls_test.o : multiple definition of 'f14()' I am using gcc 4.5 from Fedora 14. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug gold/12804] Incremental link tests failed
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12804 --- Comment #3 from Cary Coutant ccoutant at google dot com 2011-05-25 19:01:19 UTC --- OK, I think the problem is that I'm out of patch space because some small COMDAT functions are being included incorrectly. COMDAT handling is incremental patch 16, which is next up, and I think that'll fix this. Having some extra patch space added to the output file during --incremental-full would also have fixed this, but it really would have masked the problem rather than fixed it. That's one reason I'm not yet adding extra patch space. That's in patch 22, the next to be posted. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12807] New: OBJCOPY from ELF to COFF changes relocation type from 32 to 16 bits
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12807
Summary: OBJCOPY from ELF to COFF changes relocation type from
32 to 16 bits
Product: binutils
Version: unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: binutils
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: e...@la.mine.nu
Create a small C program and compile it with TCC compiler:
char *str = STR;
void
empty( void )
{
}
$tcc -c -o t.o t.c
$objdump -x t.o
[...]
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.data]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
R_386_32 L.0
// disassembled:
.data:0820 _data segment para public 'DATA' use32
.data:0820 assume cs:_data
.data:0820 ;org 820h
.data:0820 public str
.data:0820 24 00 00 08 str dd offset L_0 ; STR
.data:0824 53 54 52 00 L_0 db 'STR',0 ;
$objcopy -O pe-i386 t.o tw.obj
$objdump -x tw.obj
[...]
RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.data]:
OFFSET TYPE VALUE
1 L.0+0xfffc
// disassembled:
.data:0020 _data segment para public 'DATA' use32
.data:0020 assume cs:_data
.data:0020 ;org 20h
.data:0020 public str
.data:0020 24 00 str dw offset L_0 ; STR
.data:0022 00 00 align 4
.data:0024 53 54 52 00 L_0 db 'STR',0 ;
===
objcopy decides to change the R_386_32 type into type 1 - 16 bits
(instead of 6 - 32 bits). The PE format doesn't handle 16 bit relocations
so when you link the copied object into a program and run it you'll get a
segfault because the str pointer is null.
No error or warning is displayed by objcopy.
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
gold cannot handle _start in a library
Given:
$ gcc -c -xc (echo '_start(){}') -o start.o
$ ar cq libstart.a start.o
$ ./gold/ld-new -o foo libstart.a
The output file foo is an empty ELF file.
With:
$ ./gold/ld-new -o foo -e _start libstart.a
./gold/ld-new: warning: cannot find entry symbol '_start'
The results are the same, plus the extra warning.
BFD ld does not have this bug.
I tested with today's trunk builds of gold and BFD ld.
Thanks,
Roland
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12808] New: Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 Summary: Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol Product: binutils Version: 2.20 Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: ld AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com ReportedBy: kmtay...@gmx.com Created attachment 5752 -- http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=5752 Fixes bug - Error message may not be correct The wrong format string is used in calls to _bfd_default_error_handler. The attached patch fixes the one that caused a crash for me. The other calls are probably broken too. I do not know enough about what the error messages are trying to say to fix them properly. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug binutils/12710] Relative paths in thin archives are incorrect in certain cases
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12710 --- Comment #3 from spoo at zarbosoft dot com 2011-05-26 02:39:56 UTC --- It works great! Thanks for looking at this. I tested it in the sandbox I used to test the original version and I tested it in my project. I don't know if there are other tests I should do, but it looks good to me. -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12808] Segfault in _bfd_elf_merge_symbol
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12808 H.J. Lu hjl.tools at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #5752|application/octet-stream|text/plain mime type|| -- Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are on the CC list for the bug. ___ bug-binutils mailing list bug-binutils@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
[Bug ld/12809] New: R_X86_64_TPOFF64 isn't handled properly
http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12809
Summary: R_X86_64_TPOFF64 isn't handled properly
Product: binutils
Version: 2.22 (HEAD)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: ld
AssignedTo: unassig...@sources.redhat.com
ReportedBy: hjl.to...@gmail.com
[hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ cat foo.c
extern void abort (void);
__thread char thra[2];
void
__attribute__((noinline))
f1 (void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i 2; i++)
thra[i]= i;
}
int
main (void)
{
f1 ();
if (thra[0] != 0)
abort ();
return 0;
}
[hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ gcc -mcmodel=large -g foo.c -O
[hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$ ./a.out
Segmentation fault
[hjl@gnu-6 tmp]$
--
Configure bugmail: http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
bug-binutils mailing list
bug-binutils@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-binutils
